Post-approval indications and clinical trials for cardiovascular drugs: some implications of the US Inflation Reduction Act.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2323903
Henry Grabowski, Genia Long
{"title":"Post-approval indications and clinical trials for cardiovascular drugs: some implications of the US Inflation Reduction Act.","authors":"Henry Grabowski, Genia Long","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2323903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the historical baseline landscape of cardiovascular drug post-approval activity, including the number and timing of post-approval clinical trials and approved indications. The US Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) Drug Price Negotiation Program (DPNP) and its Maximum Fair Prices (MFPs) will affect incentives for investment in post-approval activity such as clinical trials for new indications. While three of the first ten drugs selected for the DPNP and MFP-setting are cardiovascular or antithrombotic drugs, limited attention has been paid to potential cardiovascular drug impacts, and to post-approval innovation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the 65 drugs originally approved by the FDA from 1995 through 2021 for a cardiovascular or antithrombotic indication (60 small molecules and 5 biologics), we develop a novel dataset of industry-sponsored, post-approval clinical trials and FDA-approved label changes for new indications. We analyze their number and timing relative to DPNP drug selection and MFP implementation dates, by drug approval-year cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find 49% of indications were awarded and 76% of industry-funded clinical trials were completed post-approval, reaching 98% of trials for drugs in the earliest 1995-99 cohort. For the 60 small molecules, 76% of post-approval trials ended five years or more after original drug approval, 65% ended seven or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential DPNP selection), and 53% nine or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential MFP implementation).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-approval FDA indication approvals and clinical trial starts and primary completion dates often occurred after or near new DPNP selection and MFP implementation dates. This has economic consequences for future investment incentives. Post-approval trials for small molecules, longer-duration trials, and larger-enrollment trials, and post-approval indications focused on limited patient populations and older patients could face particular economic challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2323903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the historical baseline landscape of cardiovascular drug post-approval activity, including the number and timing of post-approval clinical trials and approved indications. The US Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) Drug Price Negotiation Program (DPNP) and its Maximum Fair Prices (MFPs) will affect incentives for investment in post-approval activity such as clinical trials for new indications. While three of the first ten drugs selected for the DPNP and MFP-setting are cardiovascular or antithrombotic drugs, limited attention has been paid to potential cardiovascular drug impacts, and to post-approval innovation.

Methods: For the 65 drugs originally approved by the FDA from 1995 through 2021 for a cardiovascular or antithrombotic indication (60 small molecules and 5 biologics), we develop a novel dataset of industry-sponsored, post-approval clinical trials and FDA-approved label changes for new indications. We analyze their number and timing relative to DPNP drug selection and MFP implementation dates, by drug approval-year cohort.

Results: We find 49% of indications were awarded and 76% of industry-funded clinical trials were completed post-approval, reaching 98% of trials for drugs in the earliest 1995-99 cohort. For the 60 small molecules, 76% of post-approval trials ended five years or more after original drug approval, 65% ended seven or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential DPNP selection), and 53% nine or more years after original drug approval (i.e. after potential MFP implementation).

Conclusions: Post-approval FDA indication approvals and clinical trial starts and primary completion dates often occurred after or near new DPNP selection and MFP implementation dates. This has economic consequences for future investment incentives. Post-approval trials for small molecules, longer-duration trials, and larger-enrollment trials, and post-approval indications focused on limited patient populations and older patients could face particular economic challenges.

心血管药物的批准后适应症和临床试验以及美国降低通货膨胀法案的一些影响。
目的描述心血管药物批准后活动的历史基线情况,包括批准后临床试验的数量和时间以及批准的适应症。美国《2022 年通货膨胀削减法案》(IRA)中的药品价格谈判计划(DPNP)及其最高公平价格(MFP)将影响对新适应症临床试验等批准后活动的投资激励。对于从 1995 年到 2021 年最初由 FDA 批准用于心血管或抗血栓适应症的 65 种药物(60 种小分子药物和 5 种生物制剂),我们开发了一个新的数据集,其中包括行业赞助的批准后临床试验和 FDA 批准的新适应症标签变更。结果我们发现,49% 的适应症获得了批准,76% 的行业资助临床试验在批准后完成,最早的 1995-99 年队列中 98% 的药物试验在批准后完成。对于 60 种小分子药物,76% 的批准后试验在原药物批准五年或五年以上后结束,65% 的试验在原药物批准七年或七年以上后结束(即在可能的 DPNP 选择之后),53% 的试验在原药物批准九年或九年以上后结束(即在可能的 MFP 实施之后)。这对未来的投资激励产生了经济影响。小分子药物的批准后试验、持续时间较长的试验和参与人数较多的试验,以及集中于有限患者群体和老年患者的批准后适应症可能面临特殊的经济挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信