The mechanisms behind the contrasting responses to waterlogging in black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides) and wheat (Triticum aestivum).

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Christian Harrison, Clarice Noleto-Dias, Gianluca Ruvo, David J Hughes, Daniel P Smith, Andrew Mead, Jane L Ward, Sigrid Heuer, Dana R MacGregor
{"title":"The mechanisms behind the contrasting responses to waterlogging in black-grass (<i>Alopecurus myosuroides</i>) and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>).","authors":"Christian Harrison, Clarice Noleto-Dias, Gianluca Ruvo, David J Hughes, Daniel P Smith, Andrew Mead, Jane L Ward, Sigrid Heuer, Dana R MacGregor","doi":"10.1071/FP23193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides ) is one of the most problematic agricultural weeds of Western Europe, causing significant yield losses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum ) and other crops through competition for space and resources. Previous studies link black-grass patches to water-retaining soils, yet its specific adaptations to these conditions remain unclear. We designed pot-based waterlogging experiments to compare 13 biotypes of black-grass and six cultivars of wheat. These showed that wheat roots induced aerenchyma when waterlogged whereas aerenchyma-like structures were constitutively present in black-grass. Aerial biomass of waterlogged wheat was smaller, whereas waterlogged black-grass was similar or larger. Variability in waterlogging responses within and between these species was correlated with transcriptomic and metabolomic changes in leaves of control or waterlogged plants. In wheat, transcripts associated with regulation and utilisation of phosphate compounds were upregulated and sugars and amino acids concentrations were increased. Black-grass biotypes showed limited molecular responses to waterlogging. Some black-grass amino acids were decreased and one transcript commonly upregulated was previously identified in screens for genes underpinning metabolism-based resistance to herbicides. Our findings provide insights into the different waterlogging tolerances of these species and may help to explain the previously observed patchiness of this weed's distribution in wheat fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":12483,"journal":{"name":"Functional Plant Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional Plant Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/FP23193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black-grass (Alopecurus myosuroides ) is one of the most problematic agricultural weeds of Western Europe, causing significant yield losses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum ) and other crops through competition for space and resources. Previous studies link black-grass patches to water-retaining soils, yet its specific adaptations to these conditions remain unclear. We designed pot-based waterlogging experiments to compare 13 biotypes of black-grass and six cultivars of wheat. These showed that wheat roots induced aerenchyma when waterlogged whereas aerenchyma-like structures were constitutively present in black-grass. Aerial biomass of waterlogged wheat was smaller, whereas waterlogged black-grass was similar or larger. Variability in waterlogging responses within and between these species was correlated with transcriptomic and metabolomic changes in leaves of control or waterlogged plants. In wheat, transcripts associated with regulation and utilisation of phosphate compounds were upregulated and sugars and amino acids concentrations were increased. Black-grass biotypes showed limited molecular responses to waterlogging. Some black-grass amino acids were decreased and one transcript commonly upregulated was previously identified in screens for genes underpinning metabolism-based resistance to herbicides. Our findings provide insights into the different waterlogging tolerances of these species and may help to explain the previously observed patchiness of this weed's distribution in wheat fields.

黑草(Alopecurus myosuroides)和小麦(Triticum aestivum)对涝害的不同反应背后的机制。
黑草(Alopecurus myosuroides)是西欧最棘手的农业杂草之一,通过争夺空间和资源,给冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)和其他作物造成了巨大的产量损失。以前的研究将黑草斑块与保水土壤联系起来,但黑草对这些条件的具体适应性仍不清楚。我们设计了盆栽涝害实验,比较了 13 种黑草生物型和 6 种小麦栽培品种。实验结果表明,小麦根系在积水时会诱发气根肿,而黑草的气根肿样结构则是持续存在的。受涝小麦的气生生物量较小,而受涝黑草的气生生物量相似或更大。这些物种内部和之间对水涝反应的差异与对照或水涝植物叶片的转录组和代谢组变化相关。在小麦中,与磷酸盐化合物的调节和利用相关的转录本上调,糖和氨基酸的浓度增加。黑草生物型对水涝的分子反应有限。一些黑草氨基酸含量降低,一个普遍上调的转录本先前在筛选除草剂抗性代谢基因时被发现。我们的研究结果为了解这些物种对水涝的不同耐受性提供了见解,并可能有助于解释以前观察到的这种杂草在小麦田中的零星分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Functional Plant Biology
Functional Plant Biology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
156
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Functional Plant Biology (formerly known as Australian Journal of Plant Physiology) publishes papers of a broad interest that advance our knowledge on mechanisms by which plants operate and interact with environment. Of specific interest are mechanisms and signal transduction pathways by which plants adapt to extreme environmental conditions such as high and low temperatures, drought, flooding, salinity, pathogens, and other major abiotic and biotic stress factors. FPB also encourages papers on emerging concepts and new tools in plant biology, and studies on the following functional areas encompassing work from the molecular through whole plant to community scale. FPB does not publish merely phenomenological observations or findings of merely applied significance. Functional Plant Biology is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science. Functional Plant Biology is published in affiliation with the Federation of European Societies of Plant Biology and in Australia, is associated with the Australian Society of Plant Scientists and the New Zealand Society of Plant Biologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信