Effect of phenylephrine rescue injection on hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery when guided by both heart rate and SBP during an early warning window: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001977
Wenxi Tang, Haiying Liu, Zheng Zhang, Wenyuan Lyu, Penghui Wei, Haipeng Zhou, Jinfeng Zhou, Jianjun Li
{"title":"Effect of phenylephrine rescue injection on hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery when guided by both heart rate and SBP during an early warning window: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Wenxi Tang, Haiying Liu, Zheng Zhang, Wenyuan Lyu, Penghui Wei, Haipeng Zhou, Jinfeng Zhou, Jianjun Li","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000001977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal anaesthesia is now the most common technique for caesarean delivery. However, because of the intermittent nature of noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, maternal blood pressure may become hypotensive between the measurements. There is thus an inbuilt delay before the anaesthesiologist can intervene to counteract the hypotension. Based on the principle that changes in blood pressure can induce compensatory changes in the heart rate (HR), combining the NIBP with real-time HR, we designed two warning windows to predict hypotension and hypertension.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether phenylephrine administration guided by these warning windows would help maintain haemodynamic stability.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred and ten pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled, from which, after exclusions, 86 were eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All eligible patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of phenylephrine as soon as spinal anaesthesia was initiated. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the test group (Win-Group): rescue phenylephrine administration was triggered by an early warning window of HR above 100 beats per minute (bpm) and SBP 90 to 110 mmHg; pausing the infusion phenylephrine was triggered by a HR lower than 60 bpm and SBP greater than 90 mmHg. In the control group, phenylephrine was guided by BP only when it appeared on the monitor: SBP less than 90 mmHg was the trigger for administering rescue phenylephrine; SBP greater than 110 mmHg was the trigger for pausing the phenylephrine infusion.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypertension and other adverse haemodynamic events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the Win-Group than in the BP-Group (27.8 vs. 66.7%, P  = 0.001). The minimum SBP was significantly higher in Win-Group than in BP-Group (93.9 ± 9.49 vs. 86.7 ± 11.16 mmHg, P   =  0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertension between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, when phenylephrine infusion is guided by HR along with BP from a warning window it effectively reduces the incidence of hypotension without any significant effect on incidence of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chictr.org.cn; Identifier: ChiCTR 2100041812.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal anaesthesia is now the most common technique for caesarean delivery. However, because of the intermittent nature of noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements, maternal blood pressure may become hypotensive between the measurements. There is thus an inbuilt delay before the anaesthesiologist can intervene to counteract the hypotension. Based on the principle that changes in blood pressure can induce compensatory changes in the heart rate (HR), combining the NIBP with real-time HR, we designed two warning windows to predict hypotension and hypertension.

Objective: To evaluate whether phenylephrine administration guided by these warning windows would help maintain haemodynamic stability.

Setting: A teaching hospital.

Design: A randomised controlled trial.

Patients: One hundred and ten pregnant women scheduled for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled, from which, after exclusions, 86 were eligible for the study.

Interventions: All eligible patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of phenylephrine as soon as spinal anaesthesia was initiated. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the test group (Win-Group): rescue phenylephrine administration was triggered by an early warning window of HR above 100 beats per minute (bpm) and SBP 90 to 110 mmHg; pausing the infusion phenylephrine was triggered by a HR lower than 60 bpm and SBP greater than 90 mmHg. In the control group, phenylephrine was guided by BP only when it appeared on the monitor: SBP less than 90 mmHg was the trigger for administering rescue phenylephrine; SBP greater than 110 mmHg was the trigger for pausing the phenylephrine infusion.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of hypertension and other adverse haemodynamic events.

Results: The incidence of hypotension was significantly lower in the Win-Group than in the BP-Group (27.8 vs. 66.7%, P  = 0.001). The minimum SBP was significantly higher in Win-Group than in BP-Group (93.9 ± 9.49 vs. 86.7 ± 11.16 mmHg, P   =  0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypertension between groups.

Conclusion: After spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery, when phenylephrine infusion is guided by HR along with BP from a warning window it effectively reduces the incidence of hypotension without any significant effect on incidence of hypertension.

Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn; Identifier: ChiCTR 2100041812.

剖腹产脊髓麻醉后,在预警窗口期同时以心率和 SBP 为指导注射苯肾上腺素抢救针对低血压的影响:随机对照试验。
背景:脊髓麻醉是目前最常见的剖腹产技术。然而,由于无创血压(NIBP)测量的间歇性,产妇血压可能会在两次测量之间出现低血压。因此,在麻醉师进行干预以消除低血压之前会有一个固有的延迟。根据血压变化可引起心率(HR)代偿性变化的原理,结合无创血压和实时心率,我们设计了两个预警窗口来预测低血压和高血压:评估在这些预警窗口指导下使用苯肾上腺素是否有助于维持血流动力学稳定:设计:随机对照试验设计:随机对照试验:110名计划进行择期剖腹产的孕妇被纳入研究,经排除后,其中86名符合研究条件:所有符合条件的患者在脊髓麻醉开始后立即接受持续的苯肾上腺素静脉注射。之后,患者被随机分配到两组。试验组(Win-Group):当心率超过每分钟 100 次(bpm)和 SBP 超过 90 至 110 mmHg 时,即进入苯肾上腺素抢救输注预警窗口;当心率低于每分钟 60 次(bpm)和 SBP 超过 90 mmHg 时,即暂停输注苯肾上腺素。在对照组中,只有当血压出现在监护仪上时,才会根据血压情况输注苯肾上腺素:SBP 低于 90 mmHg 时,启动苯肾上腺素抢救;SBP 高于 110 mmHg 时,暂停苯肾上腺素输注:主要结果:低血压发生率为主要结果。次要结果为高血压和其他不良血流动力学事件的发生率:结果:Win 组的低血压发生率明显低于 BP 组(27.8% 对 66.7%,P = 0.001)。Win 组的最低 SBP 明显高于 BP 组(93.9 ± 9.49 vs. 86.7 ± 11.16 mmHg,P = 0.004)。各组间高血压发生率无明显差异:结论:剖腹产脊髓麻醉后,根据警示窗的心率和血压输注苯肾上腺素可有效降低低血压的发生率,但对高血压的发生率无明显影响:Chictr.org.cn; Identifier:试验注册:Chictr.org.cn;标识符:ChiCTR 2100041812。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信