Deducing solute differential heat capacity from experimental solubilities. An exemplified treatment of ascorbic acid to improve solubility prediction

IF 5.8 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ralph J. Lehnert
{"title":"Deducing solute differential heat capacity from experimental solubilities. An exemplified treatment of ascorbic acid to improve solubility prediction","authors":"Ralph J. Lehnert","doi":"10.1016/j.jscs.2024.101827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>Solubility prediction based on the general solubility equation (GSE) rests on reliable values for the isobaric heat capacity difference Δ<em>C<sub>p,1</sub></em> of the solid solute. Usually, this value is estimated with either zero or the melting entropy Δ<em>S<sub>1</sub></em>(<em>T<sub>m,1</sub></em>) or, in few cases, is extrapolated from data of thermally stable melts of the solute. This causes uncertainties in the prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To improve prediction accuracy a simple regression method is proposed that determines Δ<em>C<sub>p,1</sub></em> from measured solubilities.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Published experimental solubilities in neat organic solvents at 298 K of a model compound (L-(+)-ascorbic acid (LAA)) have been regressed using the GSE together with the Hansen parameter model for the activity coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><p>Regression yielded Δ<em>C<sub>p,1</sub></em> = 238 J∙mol<sup>−1</sup>∙K<sup>−1</sup> which agrees well with cross-validation results and is consistent with estimates from various group contribution methods. It was found that prediction accuracy improved in the order of increasing Δ<em>C<sub>p,1</sub></em>, that is, from 0, via 91 (=Δ<em>S<sub>1</sub></em>(<em>T<sub>m,1</sub></em>)) to 238 J∙mol<sup>−1</sup>∙K<sup>−1</sup>. It could be shown that mole fraction solubility of LAA can be forecast this way with an accuracy within current inter-laboratory variation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed method shows a general way to improve prediction accuracy of activity coefficient based solubility models by determining Δ<em>C<sub>p,1</sub></em> without resorting to common assumptions. The method is universally applicable and easy to implement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saudi Chemical Society","volume":"28 2","pages":"Article 101827"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131961032400022X/pdfft?md5=0f31e8757e99ffb8c06f8947cb52c0eb&pid=1-s2.0-S131961032400022X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saudi Chemical Society","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131961032400022X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Solubility prediction based on the general solubility equation (GSE) rests on reliable values for the isobaric heat capacity difference ΔCp,1 of the solid solute. Usually, this value is estimated with either zero or the melting entropy ΔS1(Tm,1) or, in few cases, is extrapolated from data of thermally stable melts of the solute. This causes uncertainties in the prediction.

Objective

To improve prediction accuracy a simple regression method is proposed that determines ΔCp,1 from measured solubilities.

Materials and methods

Published experimental solubilities in neat organic solvents at 298 K of a model compound (L-(+)-ascorbic acid (LAA)) have been regressed using the GSE together with the Hansen parameter model for the activity coefficient.

Results and discussion

Regression yielded ΔCp,1 = 238 J∙mol−1∙K−1 which agrees well with cross-validation results and is consistent with estimates from various group contribution methods. It was found that prediction accuracy improved in the order of increasing ΔCp,1, that is, from 0, via 91 (=ΔS1(Tm,1)) to 238 J∙mol−1∙K−1. It could be shown that mole fraction solubility of LAA can be forecast this way with an accuracy within current inter-laboratory variation.

Conclusion

The proposed method shows a general way to improve prediction accuracy of activity coefficient based solubility models by determining ΔCp,1 without resorting to common assumptions. The method is universally applicable and easy to implement.

从实验溶解度推导溶质差热容。以抗坏血酸为例改进溶解度预测
背景基于一般溶解度方程(GSE)的溶解度预测依赖于固体溶质等压热容差 ΔCp,1 的可靠数值。通常,该值是通过零或熔化熵 ΔS1(Tm,1)估算出来的,或者在少数情况下,是根据溶质热稳定熔体的数据推算出来的。为了提高预测的准确性,我们提出了一种简单的回归方法,通过测量溶解度来确定 ΔCp,1。材料与方法使用 GSE 和汉森参数模型对模型化合物(L-(+)-抗坏血酸 (LAA))在 298 K 时在纯有机溶剂中的实验溶解度进行了回归。结果和讨论回归得出的 ΔCp,1 = 238 J∙mol-1∙K-1 与交叉验证结果非常吻合,并且与各种群贡献方法的估计值一致。研究发现,预测精度随着 ΔCp,1 的增加而提高,即从 0 经过 91 (=ΔS1(Tm,1)) 到 238 J∙mol-1∙K-1 。结论所提出的方法展示了一种通用方法,可通过确定 ΔCp,1 提高基于活度系数的溶解度模型的预测精度,而无需借助常见假设。该方法普遍适用且易于实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Saudi Chemical Society
Journal of Saudi Chemical Society CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
120
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Saudi Chemical Society is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of chemistry. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on, but not limited to: •Inorganic chemistry •Physical chemistry •Organic chemistry •Analytical chemistry Journal of Saudi Chemical Society is the official publication of the Saudi Chemical Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信