[Acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge in compression therapy : Cross-sectional study in healthcare professions using phlebological compression therapy].

Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1007/s00105-024-05314-x
Kerstin Protz, Joachim Dissemond, Matthias Augustin, Toni Maria Janke
{"title":"[Acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge in compression therapy : Cross-sectional study in healthcare professions using phlebological compression therapy].","authors":"Kerstin Protz, Joachim Dissemond, Matthias Augustin, Toni Maria Janke","doi":"10.1007/s00105-024-05314-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to scientific progress, healthcare professionals should regularly undergo appropriate continuing education. For this, knowledge transfer is essential. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge of professional groups applying phlebological compression therapy in Germany.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and medical assistants) received a questionnaire developed for this study, which queried different aspects of acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses from 522 participants were analysed. The topic of compression therapy was not taught in the nursing or medical education of 43.3%. Specialist journals that address compression therapy were read regularly (at least 6 times/year) by 16.1% of the participants; 63.0% had no specialist books on this subject. Only 6.7% were aware of AWMF (\"Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften\") guidelines on the topic and 16.3% of the corresponding DNQP (\"Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege\") expert standard. In all, 41.2% participated in at least one internal training on compression therapy per year, 72.0% in external training and 19.2% in online training. A total of 30.7% stated that they did not use any information sources to acquire knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Possible sources of knowledge about compression therapy in Germany are insufficiently known within the investigated healthcare professional groups studied or are not regularly used. The result is a considerable knowledge deficit with a discrepancy between the current state of science and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72786,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"476-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11150176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00105-024-05314-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to scientific progress, healthcare professionals should regularly undergo appropriate continuing education. For this, knowledge transfer is essential. Therefore, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge of professional groups applying phlebological compression therapy in Germany.

Materials and methods: Healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and medical assistants) received a questionnaire developed for this study, which queried different aspects of acquisition, status and transfer of knowledge.

Results: Responses from 522 participants were analysed. The topic of compression therapy was not taught in the nursing or medical education of 43.3%. Specialist journals that address compression therapy were read regularly (at least 6 times/year) by 16.1% of the participants; 63.0% had no specialist books on this subject. Only 6.7% were aware of AWMF ("Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften") guidelines on the topic and 16.3% of the corresponding DNQP ("Deutsches Netzwerk für Qualitätsentwicklung in der Pflege") expert standard. In all, 41.2% participated in at least one internal training on compression therapy per year, 72.0% in external training and 19.2% in online training. A total of 30.7% stated that they did not use any information sources to acquire knowledge.

Conclusions: Possible sources of knowledge about compression therapy in Germany are insufficiently known within the investigated healthcare professional groups studied or are not regularly used. The result is a considerable knowledge deficit with a discrepancy between the current state of science and practice.

[压力疗法知识的获取、现状和转移:对使用静脉压力疗法的医疗保健专业的横断面研究]。
背景:随着科学的进步,医疗保健专业人员应定期接受适当的继续教育。为此,知识转移至关重要。因此,本横断面研究的目的是调查德国应用静脉加压疗法的专业群体的知识获取、状况和转移情况:对 522 名参与者的回答进行了分析。有 43.3% 的人在护理或医学教育中没有讲授过压力疗法。16.1%的参与者定期(至少每年 6 次)阅读有关压力疗法的专业期刊;63.0%的参与者没有这方面的专业书籍。只有 6.7% 的人知道 AWMF(德国医学科学协会)的相关指南,16.3% 的人知道相应的 DNQP(德国医疗质量发展网络)专家标准。总之,41.2%的人每年至少参加一次有关压力疗法的内部培训,72.0%的人参加过外部培训,19.2%的人参加过在线培训。共有 30.7% 的人表示没有通过任何信息来源获取相关知识:结论:在所调查的医疗保健专业群体中,对德国压力疗法知识的可能来源了解不足,或者没有经常使用。其结果是知识缺口相当大,科学现状与实践之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信