Altered EEG Patterns in Individuals with Disorganized Attachment: An EEG Microstates Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Topography Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1007/s10548-024-01038-2
Giuseppe A Carbone, Christoph M Michel, Benedetto Farina, Mauro Adenzato, Rita B Ardito, Claudio Imperatori, Fiorenzo Artoni
{"title":"Altered EEG Patterns in Individuals with Disorganized Attachment: An EEG Microstates Study.","authors":"Giuseppe A Carbone, Christoph M Michel, Benedetto Farina, Mauro Adenzato, Rita B Ardito, Claudio Imperatori, Fiorenzo Artoni","doi":"10.1007/s10548-024-01038-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past years, different studies provided preliminary evidence that Disorganized Attachment (DA) may have dysregulatory and disintegrative effects on both autonomic arousal regulation and brain connectivity. However, despite the clinical relevance of this construct, few studies have investigated the specific alterations underlying DA using electroencephalography (EEG). Thus, the main aim of the current study was to investigate EEG microstate parameters of DA in a non-clinical sample (N = 50) before (pre) and after (post) the administration of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Two EEG eyes-closed Resting State (RS) recordings were performed before and after the AAI, which was used for classifying the participants [i.e., Disorganized/Unresolved (D/U) or Organized/Resolved (O/R) individuals] and to trigger the attachment system. Microstates parameters (i.e., Mean Duration, Time Coverage and Occurrence) were extracted from each recording using Cartool software. EEG microstates clustering analysis revealed 6 different maps (labeled A, B, C, D, E, F) in both groups (i.e., D/U and O/R individuals) and in both conditions (i.e., pre-AAI and post-AAI). In the pre-AAI condition, compared to O/R individuals, D/U participants showed a shorter Mean Duration and Time Coverage of Map F; in the post-AAI condition, a significant reduction in the Mean Duration of Map E was also observed in D/U individuals. Finally, in the \"within\" statistical analysis (i.e., pre-AAI vs. post-AAI), only the D/U group exhibited a significant increase in Time Coverage of Map F after the AAI. Since these maps are associated with brain networks involved in emotional information processing and mentalization (i.e., Salience Network and Default Mode Network), our result might reflect the deficit in the ability to mentalize caregiver's interaction as well as the increased sensitivity to attachment-related stimuli typically observed in individuals with a D/U state of mind.</p>","PeriodicalId":55329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Topography","volume":" ","pages":"420-431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Topography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01038-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past years, different studies provided preliminary evidence that Disorganized Attachment (DA) may have dysregulatory and disintegrative effects on both autonomic arousal regulation and brain connectivity. However, despite the clinical relevance of this construct, few studies have investigated the specific alterations underlying DA using electroencephalography (EEG). Thus, the main aim of the current study was to investigate EEG microstate parameters of DA in a non-clinical sample (N = 50) before (pre) and after (post) the administration of the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI). Two EEG eyes-closed Resting State (RS) recordings were performed before and after the AAI, which was used for classifying the participants [i.e., Disorganized/Unresolved (D/U) or Organized/Resolved (O/R) individuals] and to trigger the attachment system. Microstates parameters (i.e., Mean Duration, Time Coverage and Occurrence) were extracted from each recording using Cartool software. EEG microstates clustering analysis revealed 6 different maps (labeled A, B, C, D, E, F) in both groups (i.e., D/U and O/R individuals) and in both conditions (i.e., pre-AAI and post-AAI). In the pre-AAI condition, compared to O/R individuals, D/U participants showed a shorter Mean Duration and Time Coverage of Map F; in the post-AAI condition, a significant reduction in the Mean Duration of Map E was also observed in D/U individuals. Finally, in the "within" statistical analysis (i.e., pre-AAI vs. post-AAI), only the D/U group exhibited a significant increase in Time Coverage of Map F after the AAI. Since these maps are associated with brain networks involved in emotional information processing and mentalization (i.e., Salience Network and Default Mode Network), our result might reflect the deficit in the ability to mentalize caregiver's interaction as well as the increased sensitivity to attachment-related stimuli typically observed in individuals with a D/U state of mind.

Abstract Image

依恋紊乱者的脑电图模式改变:脑电图微状态研究
在过去的几年中,不同的研究提供了初步证据,证明无序依恋(DA)可能会对自律性唤醒调节和大脑连接产生失调和解体作用。然而,尽管这一概念与临床密切相关,但很少有研究使用脑电图(EEG)来研究失调依恋(DA)背后的具体改变。因此,本研究的主要目的是调查非临床样本(N = 50)在进行成人依恋访谈(AAI)之前(前)和之后(后)的 DA 脑电图微状态参数。在 AAI 前后进行了两次闭眼静息状态(RS)脑电图记录,用于对参与者进行分类[即无组织/未解决(D/U)或有组织/已解决(O/R)个体]和触发依恋系统。使用 Cartool 软件从每次记录中提取微状态参数(即平均持续时间、时间覆盖率和发生率)。脑电图微观状态聚类分析显示了两组(即 D/U 和 O/R 个体)和两种条件(即人工智能前和人工智能后)下的 6 个不同图谱(标记为 A、B、C、D、E、F)。在AAI前的条件下,与O/R个体相比,D/U参与者的地图F的平均持续时间和时间覆盖范围都更短;在AAI后的条件下,D/U个体的地图E的平均持续时间也显著缩短。最后,在 "内部 "统计分析中(即AAI前与AAI后),只有D/U组在AAI后地图F的时间覆盖率有明显增加。由于这些图谱与涉及情绪信息处理和心智化的大脑网络(即 "显著性网络 "和 "默认模式网络")相关联,我们的结果可能反映了心智化照顾者互动能力的缺失,以及对依恋相关刺激敏感性的增加,而这通常是在具有D/U心智状态的个体身上观察到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Topography
Brain Topography 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Topography publishes clinical and basic research on cognitive neuroscience and functional neurophysiology using the full range of imaging techniques including EEG, MEG, fMRI, TMS, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, intracranial recordings, lesion studies, and related methods. Submissions combining multiple techniques are particularly encouraged, as well as reports of new and innovative methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信