Three-dimensional Analysis of Maxillary Morphology in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Jie Zheng, Wenying Kuang, Shiyu Yuan, Hong He, Wenjun Yuan
{"title":"Three-dimensional Analysis of Maxillary Morphology in Infants with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.","authors":"Jie Zheng, Wenying Kuang, Shiyu Yuan, Hong He, Wenjun Yuan","doi":"10.1177/10556656241228903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To three-dimensionally (3D) analyze the maxillary morphology of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and preliminarily classify the alveolar arch to assist in personalization of sequence therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patients with UCLP referred to outpatients' clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>84 nonsyndromic infants with complete UCLP were recruited (58 boys, 26 girls, mean age 29.48 days).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Morphometric analysis was conducted on 3D maxillary models. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were combined to classify maxillary phenotypes preliminarily. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare differences between variables. A <i>P</i> value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maxilla was divided into three types: narrow, homogenous and broad, accounting for 9.52%, 23.81% and 66.67% respectively. The alveolar cleft site (median value) was located in 61% of the total length of the alveolar arch. In the comparison of anterior and total alveolar lengths, the non-cleft side had longer alveolar bone than the affected side, a difference of approximately 2 mm. Pairwise comparisons of variables describing alveolar symmetry revealed significant differences in all subjects; whereas type C had poorer arch symmetry than types A and B, mainly in terms of anterior and overall symmetry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In infants with UCLP, the maxillary alveolar arch was inherently asymmetrical with partially bone missing (about 2 mm). Significant differences in alveolar bone morphology and symmetry exist between different types of infants, with individuals with broad clefts (type C, the largest proportion) having the worst maxillary development.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241228903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To three-dimensionally (3D) analyze the maxillary morphology of infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and preliminarily classify the alveolar arch to assist in personalization of sequence therapy.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Patients with UCLP referred to outpatients' clinic.

Participants: 84 nonsyndromic infants with complete UCLP were recruited (58 boys, 26 girls, mean age 29.48 days).

Main outcome measure: Morphometric analysis was conducted on 3D maxillary models. Principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis were combined to classify maxillary phenotypes preliminarily. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare differences between variables. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The maxilla was divided into three types: narrow, homogenous and broad, accounting for 9.52%, 23.81% and 66.67% respectively. The alveolar cleft site (median value) was located in 61% of the total length of the alveolar arch. In the comparison of anterior and total alveolar lengths, the non-cleft side had longer alveolar bone than the affected side, a difference of approximately 2 mm. Pairwise comparisons of variables describing alveolar symmetry revealed significant differences in all subjects; whereas type C had poorer arch symmetry than types A and B, mainly in terms of anterior and overall symmetry.

Conclusions: In infants with UCLP, the maxillary alveolar arch was inherently asymmetrical with partially bone missing (about 2 mm). Significant differences in alveolar bone morphology and symmetry exist between different types of infants, with individuals with broad clefts (type C, the largest proportion) having the worst maxillary development.

单侧唇腭裂婴儿上颌骨形态的三维分析。
目的对单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)婴儿的上颌骨形态进行三维(3D)分析,并对牙槽弓进行初步分类,以帮助进行个性化序列治疗:设计:回顾性研究:主要结果测量:对三维上颌骨模型进行形态计量分析。主成分分析(PCA)和聚类分析相结合,对上颌骨表型进行初步分类。采用 Wilcoxon Signed Rank 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验来比较变量之间的差异。P值小于0.05为具有统计学意义:上颌骨分为三种类型:狭窄型、均质型和宽阔型,分别占 9.52%、23.81% 和 66.67%。齿槽裂部位(中位值)占齿槽弓总长度的 61%。在牙槽骨前长度和总长度的比较中,非裂侧的牙槽骨长于患侧,相差约 2 毫米。对描述牙槽骨对称性的变量进行配对比较后发现,所有受试者的牙槽骨对称性都存在显著差异;而C型的牙弓对称性比A型和B型差,主要表现在前部和整体对称性方面:结论:在患有上颌腭裂综合症的婴儿中,上颌牙槽弓天生不对称,部分牙槽骨缺失(约 2 毫米)。不同类型婴儿的牙槽骨形态和对称性存在显著差异,其中宽裂婴儿(C 型,比例最大)的上颌骨发育最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信