Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-25 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_42_22
Rabie M Ibrahim, Faysal Elzawy, Ahmed Mohamed Ragheb, Akram A Elmarakbi, Osama Sayed, Amr M Lotfy, Ahmed Youssef, Hany F Badwy, Ahmed Gamal Mohamed
{"title":"Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19.","authors":"Rabie M Ibrahim, Faysal Elzawy, Ahmed Mohamed Ragheb, Akram A Elmarakbi, Osama Sayed, Amr M Lotfy, Ahmed Youssef, Hany F Badwy, Ahmed Gamal Mohamed","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_42_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1<sup>st</sup> 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1<sup>st</sup> session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2<sup>nd</sup> session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"16 1","pages":"104-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_42_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m2 were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1st 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.

Results: Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1st session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2nd session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).

Conclusions: SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.

COVID-19 时代的冲击波碎石术。
研究目的该研究旨在评估能够改善冲击波碎石术(SWL)效果的因素,以跟上COVID-19大流行的步伐:方法:2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,研究排除了放射性不透明或微弱放射性不透明上尿路结石、结石衰减值≤1200 HU 且结石大小为 11 cm、体重指数大于 30 kg/m2 的患者。在超声和荧光透视联合引导下,以 40-50 SWs/min 的速度对患者进行前瞻性 SWL 治疗,并在第 300 次冲击时将速度提升至高功率。成功率和并发症均有记录:共有 590 名患者完成了研究。第一次治疗后,成功率为 408/590 例患者(69.15%),第二次治疗后,成功率提高到 527/590 例患者(89.3%)。术后 3 个月的成功率为 96.2%。大多数并发症为轻微并发症(1 级或 2 级):在透视和超声联合引导下,从疗程一开始就使用慢速高功率,SWL 的效果有所改善。SWL可能是大流行期间的首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信