The effects of environmental and non-environmental shocks on livelihoods and migration in Tanzania

IF 3.2 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Julia M. Blocher, Roman Hoffmann, Helga Weisz
{"title":"The effects of environmental and non-environmental shocks on livelihoods and migration in Tanzania","authors":"Julia M. Blocher, Roman Hoffmann, Helga Weisz","doi":"10.1007/s11111-024-00449-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disruptive events and calamities can have major consequences for households in the predominantly agrarian communities of Eastern Africa. Here, we analyze the impacts of environmental and non-environmental shocks on migration in Tanzania using panel models and longitudinal data from the Tanzania National Panel Survey between 2008 and 2013. Shocks are defined as events that lead to losses in income, assets, or both. We find shocks resulting from changes in environmental conditions to be positively related to migration over time with more recent shocks exerting the strongest impact. According to our estimates, the probability of having a household member absent increases by 0.81% with each additional environmental shock encountered in the past 12 months. Different types of shocks have differential effects on migration with the strongest effects being observed for shocks with an immediate impact on household livelihoods, including through livestock losses and crop damage. Households in the sample are differently affected with rural, agriculturally dependent, and poor households without alternative income sources showing the strongest changes in their migration behavior in response to shocks. Our study adds important insights into the relationship between disruptive events and migration in Eastern Africa considering a broad time window and the compounding influence of different shock types. Our findings have a range of policy implications highlighting the need for a comprehensive perspective on household responses in times of distress that considers the interplay of different shock types as well as the role of context in shaping mobility patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":47692,"journal":{"name":"Population and Environment","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-024-00449-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disruptive events and calamities can have major consequences for households in the predominantly agrarian communities of Eastern Africa. Here, we analyze the impacts of environmental and non-environmental shocks on migration in Tanzania using panel models and longitudinal data from the Tanzania National Panel Survey between 2008 and 2013. Shocks are defined as events that lead to losses in income, assets, or both. We find shocks resulting from changes in environmental conditions to be positively related to migration over time with more recent shocks exerting the strongest impact. According to our estimates, the probability of having a household member absent increases by 0.81% with each additional environmental shock encountered in the past 12 months. Different types of shocks have differential effects on migration with the strongest effects being observed for shocks with an immediate impact on household livelihoods, including through livestock losses and crop damage. Households in the sample are differently affected with rural, agriculturally dependent, and poor households without alternative income sources showing the strongest changes in their migration behavior in response to shocks. Our study adds important insights into the relationship between disruptive events and migration in Eastern Africa considering a broad time window and the compounding influence of different shock types. Our findings have a range of policy implications highlighting the need for a comprehensive perspective on household responses in times of distress that considers the interplay of different shock types as well as the role of context in shaping mobility patterns.

Abstract Image

坦桑尼亚环境和非环境冲击对生计和移民的影响
在东部非洲以农业为主的社区,破坏性事件和灾难会对家庭造成重大影响。在此,我们利用面板模型和 2008 年至 2013 年坦桑尼亚全国面板调查的纵向数据,分析了环境和非环境冲击对坦桑尼亚人口迁移的影响。冲击被定义为导致收入、资产或两者损失的事件。我们发现,随着时间的推移,环境条件变化带来的冲击与人口迁移呈正相关,近期的冲击影响最大。根据我们的估计,在过去 12 个月中,每多遇到一次环境冲击,家庭成员缺席的概率就会增加 0.81%。不同类型的冲击对人口迁移的影响不同,对家庭生计有直接影响的冲击(包括牲畜损失和作物损害)的影响最大。样本中的家庭受到的影响各不相同,其中农村家庭、依赖农业的家庭以及没有其他收入来源的贫困家庭在受到冲击时的迁移行为变化最大。考虑到广泛的时间窗口和不同冲击类型的复合影响,我们的研究为东非地区破坏性事件与移民之间的关系提供了重要见解。我们的研究结果具有一系列的政策含义,强调了需要从全面的角度来看待家庭在困境中的反应,考虑不同冲击类型的相互作用以及环境在塑造人口流动模式中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Population & Environment is the sole social science journal focused on interdisciplinary research on social demographic aspects of environmental issues. The journal publishes cutting-edge research that contributes new insights on the complex, reciprocal links between human populations and the natural environment in all regions and countries of the world. Quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods contributions are welcome. Disciplines commonly represented in the journal include demography, geography, sociology, human ecology, environmental economics, public health, anthropology and environmental studies. The journal publishes original research, research brief, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信