Simplified state-dependent seismic fragility assessment

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mabel Orlacchio, Georgios Baltzopoulos, Iunio Iervolino
{"title":"Simplified state-dependent seismic fragility assessment","authors":"Mabel Orlacchio,&nbsp;Georgios Baltzopoulos,&nbsp;Iunio Iervolino","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Earthquakes are clustered in time and space; therefore, structures may be subjected to multiple consecutive instances of potentially damaging shaking, with insufficient in-between time for repair operations to take place. Methodologies to evaluate the risk dynamics in this situation require vulnerability models that are able to capture the transitions between damage states, from the intact conditions to failure, due to multiple damaging earthquakes, that is, state-dependent fragility curves. One of the state-of-the-art methods for the assessment of structure-specific state-dependent fragility curves relies on a variant of <i>incremental dynamic analysis</i> (IDA), which is often termed <i>back-to-back</i> or B2B-IDA. The computational costs typically involved in B2B-IDA motivate attempts to simplify the evaluation of state-dependent fragility curves. This paper presents a simplified method for multi-story moment-resisting frame structures, based on pushover analysis in conjunction with a predictive model for the main features of a damaged structural system, such as residual deformations and loss of stiffness and/or strength. The predictive model enables the probabilistic definition of the post-earthquake pushover curve of a damaged structural system, given the displacement demand imposed by a preceding damaging shock. The state-dependent fragility curves are then evaluated via IDA of single-degree-of-freedom oscillators based on these pushover curves. Illustrative applications validate the ability of the proposed methodology to provide state-dependent fragilities with reduced computational costs compared to the back-to-back IDA method.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquakes are clustered in time and space; therefore, structures may be subjected to multiple consecutive instances of potentially damaging shaking, with insufficient in-between time for repair operations to take place. Methodologies to evaluate the risk dynamics in this situation require vulnerability models that are able to capture the transitions between damage states, from the intact conditions to failure, due to multiple damaging earthquakes, that is, state-dependent fragility curves. One of the state-of-the-art methods for the assessment of structure-specific state-dependent fragility curves relies on a variant of incremental dynamic analysis (IDA), which is often termed back-to-back or B2B-IDA. The computational costs typically involved in B2B-IDA motivate attempts to simplify the evaluation of state-dependent fragility curves. This paper presents a simplified method for multi-story moment-resisting frame structures, based on pushover analysis in conjunction with a predictive model for the main features of a damaged structural system, such as residual deformations and loss of stiffness and/or strength. The predictive model enables the probabilistic definition of the post-earthquake pushover curve of a damaged structural system, given the displacement demand imposed by a preceding damaging shock. The state-dependent fragility curves are then evaluated via IDA of single-degree-of-freedom oscillators based on these pushover curves. Illustrative applications validate the ability of the proposed methodology to provide state-dependent fragilities with reduced computational costs compared to the back-to-back IDA method.

简化的随状态变化的地震脆性评估
地震在时间和空间上都是集中发生的;因此,建筑物可能会连续受到多次潜在破坏性摇晃的影响,而中间没有足够的时间进行修复作业。在这种情况下,评估风险动态的方法要求脆弱性模型能够捕捉到多次破坏性地震造成的从完好状态到破坏状态之间的转变,即与状态相关的脆性曲线。评估特定结构随状态变化的脆性曲线的最先进方法之一是增量动力分析(IDA)的变体,通常称为背靠背或 B2B-IDA。B2B-IDA 通常涉及的计算成本促使人们尝试简化随状态变化的脆性曲线评估。本文介绍了一种适用于多层力矩抵抗框架结构的简化方法,该方法以推移分析为基础,结合受损结构系统主要特征的预测模型,如残余变形、刚度和/或强度损失。该预测模型可根据之前破坏性冲击施加的位移要求,对受损结构系统的震后推移曲线进行概率定义。然后,根据这些推移曲线,通过单自由度振荡器的 IDA 评估与状态相关的脆性曲线。示例应用验证了所建议的方法能够提供与状态相关的脆性,与背靠背 IDA 方法相比,计算成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信