Assessing impacts of ecological restoration project on water retention function in the Taihang Mountain area, China

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecohydrology Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1002/eco.2638
Feng Wang, Jintong Liu, Wei Deng, Tonggang Fu, Hui Gao, Fei Qi
{"title":"Assessing impacts of ecological restoration project on water retention function in the Taihang Mountain area, China","authors":"Feng Wang,&nbsp;Jintong Liu,&nbsp;Wei Deng,&nbsp;Tonggang Fu,&nbsp;Hui Gao,&nbsp;Fei Qi","doi":"10.1002/eco.2638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ecological restoration (ER) project significantly affects the water retention function in the Taihang Mountain area. However, a comprehensive understanding of the water retention effects in different ER project areas still needs to be improved. In this study, we employed the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs (InVEST) model to evaluate the differences in water retention among different ER project areas. Additionally, we used the structural equation model to explore the influence of various factors on water retention. The results showed the following: (1) The total amount of water retention in the Taihang Mountain area increased yearly from 2000 to 2020, with an 85.25% increase in 21 years. The water retention function showed a trend of transferring to a higher level. (2) The forest land restoration project showed the highest average water retention capacity, followed by the grassland restoration project, which together provided 61.12% of the water retention capacity in the ER areas. Forest land restoration project was found to have the most potential in improving water retention, while grassland restoration was more efficient. The water retention capacity of a 21-year-old artificial forest could only reach 70.92% of the natural forest. Cropland restoration mode increased the water retention by 22.85% compared with non-ecological engineering areas. (3) The enhancement of water retention function in the study area resulted from multiple factors, among which precipitation and root depth were the most critical variables. (4) According to the structural equation model, the impact of natural factors on water retention accounted for 74.33%, and ecological engineering had a greater impact on water retention in the hilly zone. The ER project significantly increased water retention capacity. The results provide scientific support for improving water retention function and optimizing ER projects in semi-arid areas of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.2638","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecological restoration (ER) project significantly affects the water retention function in the Taihang Mountain area. However, a comprehensive understanding of the water retention effects in different ER project areas still needs to be improved. In this study, we employed the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs (InVEST) model to evaluate the differences in water retention among different ER project areas. Additionally, we used the structural equation model to explore the influence of various factors on water retention. The results showed the following: (1) The total amount of water retention in the Taihang Mountain area increased yearly from 2000 to 2020, with an 85.25% increase in 21 years. The water retention function showed a trend of transferring to a higher level. (2) The forest land restoration project showed the highest average water retention capacity, followed by the grassland restoration project, which together provided 61.12% of the water retention capacity in the ER areas. Forest land restoration project was found to have the most potential in improving water retention, while grassland restoration was more efficient. The water retention capacity of a 21-year-old artificial forest could only reach 70.92% of the natural forest. Cropland restoration mode increased the water retention by 22.85% compared with non-ecological engineering areas. (3) The enhancement of water retention function in the study area resulted from multiple factors, among which precipitation and root depth were the most critical variables. (4) According to the structural equation model, the impact of natural factors on water retention accounted for 74.33%, and ecological engineering had a greater impact on water retention in the hilly zone. The ER project significantly increased water retention capacity. The results provide scientific support for improving water retention function and optimizing ER projects in semi-arid areas of China.

中国太行山区生态修复工程对水源涵养功能的影响评估
生态修复(ER)工程对太行山地区的水源涵养功能产生了重大影响。然而,对不同生态修复工程区域水源涵养效果的全面认识仍有待提高。在本研究中,我们采用生态系统服务与权衡综合评价模型(InVEST)来评估不同生态修复项目区在水源涵养方面的差异。此外,我们还利用结构方程模型探讨了各种因素对保水率的影响。结果显示如下(1)2000 年至 2020 年,太行山区保水总量逐年增加,21 年间增加了 85.25%。水源涵养功能呈向更高层次转移的趋势。(2)林地恢复工程的平均水源涵养量最高,其次是草地恢复工程,两者合计提供的水源涵养量占 ER 区水源涵养量的 61.12%。研究发现,林地恢复工程在提高水源涵养能力方面最具潜力,而草地恢复工程的效率更高。有 21 年树龄的人工林的保水能力只能达到天然林的 70.92%。与非生态工程区相比,耕地恢复模式的保水性提高了 22.85%。(3)研究区水源涵养功能的提高是多因素作用的结果,其中降水和根系深度是最关键的变量。(4) 根据结构方程模型,自然因素对保水功能的影响占 74.33%,生态工程对丘陵地带的保水功能影响更大。生态工程明显提高了水源涵养能力。研究结果为中国半干旱地区提高水源涵养功能、优化 ER 工程提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecohydrology
Ecohydrology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
116
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management. Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信