Maidul Islam, Suraj Bijjahalli, Thomas Fahey, Alessandro Gardi, Roberto Sabatini, David W. Lamb
{"title":"Destructive and non-destructive measurement approaches and the application of AI models in precision agriculture: a review","authors":"Maidul Islam, Suraj Bijjahalli, Thomas Fahey, Alessandro Gardi, Roberto Sabatini, David W. Lamb","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10112-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The estimation of pre-harvest fruit quality and maturity is essential for growers to determine the harvest timing, storage requirements and profitability of the crop yield. In-field fruit maturity indicators are highly variable and require high spatiotemporal resolution data, which can be obtained from contemporary precision agriculture systems. Such systems exploit various state-of-the-art sensors, increasingly relying on spectrometry and imaging techniques in association with advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. This article presents a critical review of precision agriculture techniques for fruit maturity estimation, with a focus on destructive and non-destructive measurement approaches, and the applications of ML in the domain. A critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques is conducted by surveying recent articles on non-destructive methods to discern trends in performance and applicability. Advanced data-fusion methods for combining information from multiple non-destructive sensors are increasingly being used to develop more accurate representations of fruit maturity for the entire field. This is achieved by incorporating AI algorithms, such as support vector machines, k-nearest neighbour, neural networks, and clustering. Based on an extensive survey of recently published research, the review also identifies the most effective fruit maturity indices, namely: sugar content, acidity and firmness. The review concludes by highlighting the outstanding technical challenges and identifies the most promising areas for future research. Hence, this research has the potential to provide a valuable resource for the growers, allowing them to familiarize themselves with contemporary Smart Agricultural methodologies currently in use. These practices can be gradually incorporated from their perspective, taking into account the availability of non-destructive techniques and the use of efficient fruit maturity indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10112-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The estimation of pre-harvest fruit quality and maturity is essential for growers to determine the harvest timing, storage requirements and profitability of the crop yield. In-field fruit maturity indicators are highly variable and require high spatiotemporal resolution data, which can be obtained from contemporary precision agriculture systems. Such systems exploit various state-of-the-art sensors, increasingly relying on spectrometry and imaging techniques in association with advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. This article presents a critical review of precision agriculture techniques for fruit maturity estimation, with a focus on destructive and non-destructive measurement approaches, and the applications of ML in the domain. A critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of different techniques is conducted by surveying recent articles on non-destructive methods to discern trends in performance and applicability. Advanced data-fusion methods for combining information from multiple non-destructive sensors are increasingly being used to develop more accurate representations of fruit maturity for the entire field. This is achieved by incorporating AI algorithms, such as support vector machines, k-nearest neighbour, neural networks, and clustering. Based on an extensive survey of recently published research, the review also identifies the most effective fruit maturity indices, namely: sugar content, acidity and firmness. The review concludes by highlighting the outstanding technical challenges and identifies the most promising areas for future research. Hence, this research has the potential to provide a valuable resource for the growers, allowing them to familiarize themselves with contemporary Smart Agricultural methodologies currently in use. These practices can be gradually incorporated from their perspective, taking into account the availability of non-destructive techniques and the use of efficient fruit maturity indices.
对种植者来说,估计收获前的果实质量和成熟度对于确定收获时间、贮藏要求和作物产量的收益率至关重要。田间水果成熟度指标变化很大,需要高时空分辨率的数据,而这些数据可以从现代精准农业系统中获得。这些系统利用各种最先进的传感器,越来越多地依赖光谱学和成像技术以及先进的人工智能(AI),特别是机器学习(ML)算法。本文对用于水果成熟度估算的精准农业技术进行了深入评述,重点关注破坏性和非破坏性测量方法以及 ML 在该领域的应用。通过调查近期有关非破坏性方法的文章,对不同技术的优缺点进行了批判性分析,以发现性能和适用性方面的趋势。结合多个非破坏性传感器信息的先进数据融合方法正越来越多地用于为整个田地开发更准确的水果成熟度表征。这种方法结合了人工智能算法,如支持向量机、k-近邻、神经网络和聚类。在对近期发表的研究进行广泛调查的基础上,综述还确定了最有效的水果成熟度指数,即:含糖量、酸度和硬度。综述最后强调了突出的技术挑战,并确定了最有希望的未来研究领域。因此,这项研究有可能为种植者提供宝贵的资源,让他们熟悉目前使用的当代智能农业方法。考虑到非破坏性技术的可用性和高效果实成熟度指数的使用,这些做法可以从他们的角度逐步融入。
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.