{"title":"Enhancing the Reach and Reliability of Quantum Annealers by Pruning Longer Chains","authors":"Ramin Ayanzadeh;Moinuddin Qureshi","doi":"10.1109/LCA.2023.3340030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analog Quantum Computers (QCs), such as D-Wave's \n<italic>Quantum Annealers</i>\n (\n<italic>QAs</i>\n) and QuEra's neutral atom platform, rival their digital counterparts in computing power. Existing QAs boast over 5,700 qubits, but their single-instruction operation model prevents using SWAP operations for making physically distant qubits adjacent. Instead, QAs use an \n<italic>embedding</i>\n process to chain multiple \n<italic>physical qubits</i>\n together, representing a \n<italic>program qubit</i>\n with higher connectivity and reducing effective QA capacity by up to 33x. We observe that, post-embedding, nearly 25% of physical qubits remain unused, becoming trapped between chains. Additionally, we observe a “Power-Law” distribution in the chain lengths, where a few \n<italic>dominant chains</i>\n possess significantly more qubits, thereby exerting a considerably more significant impact on both qubit utilization and isolation. Leveraging these insights, we propose \n<italic>Skipper</i>\n, a software technique designed to enhance the capacity and fidelity of QAs by skipping dominant chains and substituting their program qubit with two measurement outcomes. Using a 5761-qubit QA, we observed that by skipping up to eleven chains, the capacity increased by up to 59% (avg 28%), and the error decreased by up to 44% (avg 33%).","PeriodicalId":51248,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Computer Architecture Letters","volume":"23 1","pages":"25-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Computer Architecture Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10345714/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Analog Quantum Computers (QCs), such as D-Wave's
Quantum Annealers
(
QAs
) and QuEra's neutral atom platform, rival their digital counterparts in computing power. Existing QAs boast over 5,700 qubits, but their single-instruction operation model prevents using SWAP operations for making physically distant qubits adjacent. Instead, QAs use an
embedding
process to chain multiple
physical qubits
together, representing a
program qubit
with higher connectivity and reducing effective QA capacity by up to 33x. We observe that, post-embedding, nearly 25% of physical qubits remain unused, becoming trapped between chains. Additionally, we observe a “Power-Law” distribution in the chain lengths, where a few
dominant chains
possess significantly more qubits, thereby exerting a considerably more significant impact on both qubit utilization and isolation. Leveraging these insights, we propose
Skipper
, a software technique designed to enhance the capacity and fidelity of QAs by skipping dominant chains and substituting their program qubit with two measurement outcomes. Using a 5761-qubit QA, we observed that by skipping up to eleven chains, the capacity increased by up to 59% (avg 28%), and the error decreased by up to 44% (avg 33%).
期刊介绍:
IEEE Computer Architecture Letters is a rigorously peer-reviewed forum for publishing early, high-impact results in the areas of uni- and multiprocessor computer systems, computer architecture, microarchitecture, workload characterization, performance evaluation and simulation techniques, and power-aware computing. Submissions are welcomed on any topic in computer architecture, especially but not limited to: microprocessor and multiprocessor systems, microarchitecture and ILP processors, workload characterization, performance evaluation and simulation techniques, compiler-hardware and operating system-hardware interactions, interconnect architectures, memory and cache systems, power and thermal issues at the architecture level, I/O architectures and techniques, independent validation of previously published results, analysis of unsuccessful techniques, domain-specific processor architectures (e.g., embedded, graphics, network, etc.), real-time and high-availability architectures, reconfigurable systems.