Comparison of Peripapillary Choroidal Thickness Between Primary Open-angle Glaucoma, Normal Tension Glaucoma, and Normal Eyes

IF 2.8 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"Comparison of Peripapillary Choroidal Thickness Between Primary Open-angle Glaucoma, Normal Tension Glaucoma, and Normal Eyes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ogla.2024.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Topic</h3><p>To investigate differences in peripapillary choroidal thickness (PPCT) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and healthy eyes, additionally comparing differences between POAG and NTG eyes.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Peripapillary choroidal thickness is a well-established OCT parameter in eyes with glaucoma and other ocular pathologies. The relationship between PPCT and glaucoma, if better understood, may facilitate the development of PPCT as a potential diagnostic and monitoring metric for glaucoma. In particular, there has yet to be a synthesis that directly compares PPCT between POAG eyes and NTG eyes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, identifying studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies that measured PPCT using OCT in POAG, NTG, and healthy eyes. Mean difference (MD) among groups was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.0. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a pooled total of 935 healthy control eyes, 446 NTG eyes, and 934 POAG eyes. There was a significant reduction of PPCT in POAG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = −16.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) (−27.55 to −5.09)]. Reduction in PPCT was also significant in NTG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = −34.96; 95% CI (−49.97 to −19.95)]. NTG eyes had significantly reduced PPCT compared with POAG eyes [MD = −26.64; 95% CI (−49.00 to −4.28)].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Glaucomatous eyes appear to have significantly reduced PPCT compared with normal healthy eyes. In addition, PPCT in NTG eyes appear significantly thinner compared with that in POAG eyes.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19519,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 359-371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000358/pdfft?md5=8ca71efef5ad22c91b181ca2905cc56f&pid=1-s2.0-S2589419624000358-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589419624000358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Topic

To investigate differences in peripapillary choroidal thickness (PPCT) between primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and healthy eyes, additionally comparing differences between POAG and NTG eyes.

Clinical Relevance

Peripapillary choroidal thickness is a well-established OCT parameter in eyes with glaucoma and other ocular pathologies. The relationship between PPCT and glaucoma, if better understood, may facilitate the development of PPCT as a potential diagnostic and monitoring metric for glaucoma. In particular, there has yet to be a synthesis that directly compares PPCT between POAG eyes and NTG eyes.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, identifying studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies that measured PPCT using OCT in POAG, NTG, and healthy eyes. Mean difference (MD) among groups was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.0. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS).

Results

Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a pooled total of 935 healthy control eyes, 446 NTG eyes, and 934 POAG eyes. There was a significant reduction of PPCT in POAG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = −16.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) (−27.55 to −5.09)]. Reduction in PPCT was also significant in NTG eyes compared with healthy eyes [MD = −34.96; 95% CI (−49.97 to −19.95)]. NTG eyes had significantly reduced PPCT compared with POAG eyes [MD = −26.64; 95% CI (−49.00 to −4.28)].

Conclusions

Glaucomatous eyes appear to have significantly reduced PPCT compared with normal healthy eyes. In addition, PPCT in NTG eyes appear significantly thinner compared with that in POAG eyes.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

原发性开角型青光眼、正常张力性青光眼和正常眼毛细血管周围厚度的比较:系统回顾和元分析。
主题研究原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、正常张力青光眼(NTG)和健康眼之间毛细血管周围脉络膜厚度(PPCT)的差异,并比较POAG和NTG眼之间的差异:毛细血管周围脉络膜厚度(PPCT)是青光眼和其他眼部病变中一个成熟的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数。如果能更好地了解 PPCT 与青光眼之间的关系,将有助于将 PPCT 发展成为一种潜在的青光眼诊断和监测指标。特别是,目前还没有直接比较POAG眼和NTG眼的PPCT的综述:在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了全面的文献检索,确定了从开始到 2022 年 12 月的研究。我们纳入了使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量 POAG、NTG 和健康眼 PPCT 的研究。计算各组间的平均差(MD)。统计分析使用 R 4.2.0 版本进行。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行评估:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 18 项研究,汇总了 935 只健康对照眼、446 只 NTG 眼和 934 只 POAG 眼。与健康眼相比,POAG 眼的 PPCT 明显下降[MD = -16.32,95% CI (-27.55, -5.09)]。与健康眼睛相比,NTG 眼睛的 PPCT 也有显著降低[MD = -34.96,95% CI (-49.97, -19.95)]。与POAG眼相比,NTG眼的PPCT明显降低[MD = -26.64,95% CI (-49.00, -4.28)]:结论:与正常健康眼相比,青光眼眼的 PPCT 明显降低。结论:与正常健康眼睛相比,青光眼患者眼睛的 PPCT 明显减少。此外,与 POAG 眼睛相比,NTG 眼睛的 PPCT 明显变薄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信