Acceptability and feasibility of SUCCEAT, an intervention for parents of adolescents with anorexia nervosa

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Julia Philipp, Claudia Franta, Michael Zeiler, Stefanie Truttmann, Tanja Wittek, Gabriele Schöfbeck, Dunja Mairhofer, Michaela Mitterer, Clarissa Laczkovics, Janet Treasure, Andreas F. K. Karwautz, Gudrun Wagner
{"title":"Acceptability and feasibility of SUCCEAT, an intervention for parents of adolescents with anorexia nervosa","authors":"Julia Philipp,&nbsp;Claudia Franta,&nbsp;Michael Zeiler,&nbsp;Stefanie Truttmann,&nbsp;Tanja Wittek,&nbsp;Gabriele Schöfbeck,&nbsp;Dunja Mairhofer,&nbsp;Michaela Mitterer,&nbsp;Clarissa Laczkovics,&nbsp;Janet Treasure,&nbsp;Andreas F. K. Karwautz,&nbsp;Gudrun Wagner","doi":"10.1002/erv.3080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>“Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents with Eating Disorders in Austria” (SUCCEAT), a skills training for parents, delivered via workshops (WS) or online modules (ONL), has been proven to be effective in terms of parental distress, caregiver skills, and adolescents' outcome. This study examined the adherence to and the acceptability and feasibility of SUCCEAT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>One-hundred parents (86% mothers) of adolescents with anorexia nervosa participated in the 8-week training. Parents were assigned to the WS (<i>n</i> = 50) or ONL (<i>n</i> = 50) format using a quasi-randomised design. Adherence, acceptability, and feasibility were assessed using self-report questionnaires.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Adherence to the sessions was high (66%–98%) for both groups. The usage of the material was comparable between the groups. However, in the WS group, participants actively approached the coaches (71.8% vs. 48.9% often/very often) or other parents (63% vs. 4.4% often/very often) more often. Perceived helpfulness was high in both groups, overall satisfaction and practicability were higher in the WS group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Good adherence, acceptability, and feasibility were confirmed for both formats of SUCCEAT, with minimal advantages of the WS regarding satisfaction and contact with other parents and coaches. Thus, both formats can be recommended for implementation in clinical routine.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"32 4","pages":"662-675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3080","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

“Supporting Carers of Children and Adolescents with Eating Disorders in Austria” (SUCCEAT), a skills training for parents, delivered via workshops (WS) or online modules (ONL), has been proven to be effective in terms of parental distress, caregiver skills, and adolescents' outcome. This study examined the adherence to and the acceptability and feasibility of SUCCEAT.

Method

One-hundred parents (86% mothers) of adolescents with anorexia nervosa participated in the 8-week training. Parents were assigned to the WS (n = 50) or ONL (n = 50) format using a quasi-randomised design. Adherence, acceptability, and feasibility were assessed using self-report questionnaires.

Results

Adherence to the sessions was high (66%–98%) for both groups. The usage of the material was comparable between the groups. However, in the WS group, participants actively approached the coaches (71.8% vs. 48.9% often/very often) or other parents (63% vs. 4.4% often/very often) more often. Perceived helpfulness was high in both groups, overall satisfaction and practicability were higher in the WS group.

Conclusions

Good adherence, acceptability, and feasibility were confirmed for both formats of SUCCEAT, with minimal advantages of the WS regarding satisfaction and contact with other parents and coaches. Thus, both formats can be recommended for implementation in clinical routine.

Abstract Image

针对神经性厌食症青少年家长的干预措施 SUCCEAT 的可接受性和可行性。
目的:"为奥地利儿童和青少年饮食失调患者的照顾者提供支持"(SUCCEAT)是一项针对家长的技能培训,通过工作坊(WS)或在线模块(ONL)的方式进行,已被证明在减轻家长的痛苦、提高照顾者的技能和改善青少年的健康状况方面非常有效。本研究考察了 SUCCEAT 的坚持度、可接受性和可行性:100名神经性厌食症青少年的家长(86%为母亲)参加了为期8周的培训。采用准随机设计将家长分配到 WS(50 人)或 ONL(50 人)模式。采用自我报告问卷对坚持性、可接受性和可行性进行了评估:结果:两组的坚持率都很高(66%-98%)。两组的教材使用率相当。然而,在 WS 组中,参与者更经常主动与教练(71.8% 对 48.9%,经常/非常经常)或其他家长(63% 对 4.4%,经常/非常经常)接触。两组参与者对帮助的认知度都很高,WS 组的总体满意度和实用性更高:SUCCEAT的两种形式都具有良好的依从性、可接受性和可行性,而WS在满意度以及与其他家长和教练的接触方面具有最小的优势。因此,建议在临床常规中采用这两种形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信