Transrectal ultrasound for intraoperative interstitial needle guidance in cervical cancer brachytherapy.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s00066-024-02207-9
J Knoth, A Sturdza, A Zaharie, V Dick, G Kronreif, N Nesvacil, J Widder, C Kirisits, M P Schmid
{"title":"Transrectal ultrasound for intraoperative interstitial needle guidance in cervical cancer brachytherapy.","authors":"J Knoth, A Sturdza, A Zaharie, V Dick, G Kronreif, N Nesvacil, J Widder, C Kirisits, M P Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s00066-024-02207-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to prospectively assess the visibility of interstitial needles on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in cervical cancer brachytherapy patients and evaluate its impact on implant and treatment plan quality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>TRUS was utilized during and after applicator insertion, with each needle's visibility documented through axial images at the high-risk clinical target volume's largest diameter. Needle visibility on TRUS was scored from 0 (no visibility) to 3 (excellent discrimination, margins distinct). Quantitative assessment involved measuring the distance between tandem and each needle on TRUS and comparing it to respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Expected treatment plan quality based on TRUS images was rated from 1 (meeting all planning objectives) to 4 (violation of High-risk clinical target volume (CTV<sub>HR</sub>) and/or organ at risk (OAR) hard constraints) and compared to the final MRI-based plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis included 23 patients with local FIGO stage IB2-IVA, comprising 41 applications with a total of 230 needles. A high visibility rate of 99.1% (228/230 needles) was observed, with a mean visibility score of 2.5 ± 0.7 for visible needles. The maximum and mean difference between MRI and TRUS measurements were 8 mm and -0.1 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, with > 3 mm discrepancies in 3.5% of needles. Expected treatment plan quality after TRUS assessment exactly aligned with the final MRI plan in 28 out of 41 applications with only minor deviations in all other cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-time TRUS-guided interstitial needle placement yielded high-quality implants, thanks to excellent needle visibility during insertion. This supports the potential of TRUS-guided brachytherapy as a promising modality for gynecological indications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":"684-690"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-024-02207-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to prospectively assess the visibility of interstitial needles on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in cervical cancer brachytherapy patients and evaluate its impact on implant and treatment plan quality.

Material and methods: TRUS was utilized during and after applicator insertion, with each needle's visibility documented through axial images at the high-risk clinical target volume's largest diameter. Needle visibility on TRUS was scored from 0 (no visibility) to 3 (excellent discrimination, margins distinct). Quantitative assessment involved measuring the distance between tandem and each needle on TRUS and comparing it to respective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Expected treatment plan quality based on TRUS images was rated from 1 (meeting all planning objectives) to 4 (violation of High-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) and/or organ at risk (OAR) hard constraints) and compared to the final MRI-based plan.

Results: Analysis included 23 patients with local FIGO stage IB2-IVA, comprising 41 applications with a total of 230 needles. A high visibility rate of 99.1% (228/230 needles) was observed, with a mean visibility score of 2.5 ± 0.7 for visible needles. The maximum and mean difference between MRI and TRUS measurements were 8 mm and -0.1 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, with > 3 mm discrepancies in 3.5% of needles. Expected treatment plan quality after TRUS assessment exactly aligned with the final MRI plan in 28 out of 41 applications with only minor deviations in all other cases.

Conclusion: Real-time TRUS-guided interstitial needle placement yielded high-quality implants, thanks to excellent needle visibility during insertion. This supports the potential of TRUS-guided brachytherapy as a promising modality for gynecological indications.

Abstract Image

经直肠超声用于宫颈癌近距离治疗术中间质针引导。
目的:本研究旨在通过经直肠超声(TRUS)对宫颈癌近距离治疗患者间质针的可见度进行前瞻性评估,并评价其对植入和治疗方案质量的影响:在应用器插入时和插入后使用 TRUS,通过轴向图像记录高风险临床靶体积最大直径处每枚针的可见度。TRUS 上的穿刺针可见度从 0(无可见度)到 3(辨别力极佳,边缘清晰)进行评分。定量评估包括测量 TRUS 上串联针和每个针之间的距离,并将其与相应的磁共振成像(MRI)测量值进行比较。基于 TRUS 图像的预期治疗计划质量从 1(满足所有计划目标)到 4(违反高风险临床目标容积 (CTVHR) 和/或高风险器官 (OAR) 硬约束)不等,并与基于 MRI 的最终计划进行比较:分析对象包括 23 名 FIGO IB2-IVA 期患者,共 41 次应用,230 根针。可见度高达 99.1%(228/230 针),可见针的平均可见度为 2.5 ± 0.7。MRI 和 TRUS 测量值的最大和平均差异分别为 8 毫米和 -0.1 ± 1.6 毫米,3.5% 的针差异大于 3 毫米。在41例应用中,28例经TRUS评估后的预期治疗方案质量与最终的核磁共振成像方案完全一致,所有其他病例仅有轻微偏差:结论:TRUS引导下的实时间质针置入可获得高质量的植入物,这要归功于置入过程中良好的针可视性。这支持了 TRUS 引导近距离放射治疗作为妇科适应症的一种有潜力的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信