Efficacy and Safety of Generic Alendronate for Osteoporosis Treatment.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S445202
Atthakorn Jarusriwanna, Saran Malisorn, Sirikarn Tananoo, Kwanchanok Areewong, Supachok Rasamimongkol, Artit Laoruengthana
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Generic Alendronate for Osteoporosis Treatment.","authors":"Atthakorn Jarusriwanna, Saran Malisorn, Sirikarn Tananoo, Kwanchanok Areewong, Supachok Rasamimongkol, Artit Laoruengthana","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S445202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While osteoporosis increases the risk of fragility fractures, bisphosphonate has been proven to increase bone strength and reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In addition to its efficacy, substituting the brand with generic medication is a strategy to optimize healthcare expenditures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of generic alendronate treatment and assess potential adverse events in patients with osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 120 patients who met the indications for osteoporosis treatment, received weekly generic alendronate (70 mg) for >1 year, and underwent evaluation through standard axial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The outcomes of this study were the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip after one year of treatment. The major adverse events occurring during medication that led to the discontinuation of drug administration were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients were female (96.7%) with an average age of 69.0 ± 9.3 years. The percent change in BMD increased at all sites after one year of generic alendronate treatment (lumbar spine: 5.6 ± 13.7, <i>p</i>-value <0.001; femoral neck: 2.3 ± 8.3, <i>p</i>-value = 0.023; total hip: 2.1 ± 6.2, <i>p</i>-value = 0.003), with over 85% of patients experiencing increased or stable BMD. Three patients discontinued the medication due to adverse effects: two had dyspepsia, and one had persistent myalgia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Generic alendronate may be considered an effective antiresorptive agent for osteoporosis treatment with a low incidence of adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S445202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While osteoporosis increases the risk of fragility fractures, bisphosphonate has been proven to increase bone strength and reduce the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In addition to its efficacy, substituting the brand with generic medication is a strategy to optimize healthcare expenditures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of generic alendronate treatment and assess potential adverse events in patients with osteoporosis.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 120 patients who met the indications for osteoporosis treatment, received weekly generic alendronate (70 mg) for >1 year, and underwent evaluation through standard axial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The outcomes of this study were the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip after one year of treatment. The major adverse events occurring during medication that led to the discontinuation of drug administration were documented.

Results: Most patients were female (96.7%) with an average age of 69.0 ± 9.3 years. The percent change in BMD increased at all sites after one year of generic alendronate treatment (lumbar spine: 5.6 ± 13.7, p-value <0.001; femoral neck: 2.3 ± 8.3, p-value = 0.023; total hip: 2.1 ± 6.2, p-value = 0.003), with over 85% of patients experiencing increased or stable BMD. Three patients discontinued the medication due to adverse effects: two had dyspepsia, and one had persistent myalgia.

Conclusion: Generic alendronate may be considered an effective antiresorptive agent for osteoporosis treatment with a low incidence of adverse effects.

非专利阿仑膦酸钠治疗骨质疏松症的有效性和安全性。
背景:骨质疏松症会增加脆性骨折的风险,而双膦酸盐已被证实可增强骨强度,降低椎体和非椎体骨折的风险。除了疗效之外,用仿制药替代品牌药也是优化医疗支出的一种策略。本研究旨在评估非专利阿仑膦酸钠治疗骨质疏松症患者的疗效,并评估潜在的不良反应:本研究对 120 例符合骨质疏松症治疗指征、每周服用普通阿仑膦酸钠(70 毫克)超过 1 年并通过标准轴向双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)进行评估的患者进行了回顾性研究。本研究的结果是治疗一年后腰椎、股骨颈和全髋骨矿物质密度(BMD)的变化百分比。研究还记录了用药期间发生的导致停药的主要不良事件:大多数患者为女性(96.7%),平均年龄为 69.0 ± 9.3 岁。阿仑膦酸钠非专利药治疗一年后,所有部位的 BMD 百分比变化均有所增加(腰椎:5.6 ± 13.7,p 值 = 0.023;全髋:2.1 ± 6.2,p 值 = 0.003),85% 以上的患者 BMD 有所增加或保持稳定。三名患者因不良反应停药:两人消化不良,一人持续肌痛:通用阿仑膦酸钠可被视为治疗骨质疏松症的有效抗骨质吸收药物,且不良反应发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信