A custom next-generation sequencing panel for 1p/19q codeletion and mutational analysis in gliomas.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Peng Qi, Qian-Lan Yao, I Weng Lao, Min Ren, Qian-Ming Bai, Xu Cai, Tian Xue, Ran Wei, Xiao-Yan Zhou
{"title":"A custom next-generation sequencing panel for 1p/19q codeletion and mutational analysis in gliomas.","authors":"Peng Qi, Qian-Lan Yao, I Weng Lao, Min Ren, Qian-Ming Bai, Xu Cai, Tian Xue, Ran Wei, Xiao-Yan Zhou","doi":"10.1093/jnen/nlae011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization has updated their classification system for the diagnosis of gliomas, combining histological features with molecular data including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. 1p/19q codeletion analysis is commonly performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, we developed a 57-gene targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including 1p/19q codeletion detection mainly to assess diagnosis and potential treatment response in melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and glioma patients. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed using the NGS method on 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioma tissues that showed 1p and/or 19q loss determined by FISH. Conventional methods were applied for the validation of some glioma-related gene mutations. In 81.1% (30 of 37) and 94.6% (35 of 37) of cases, 1p and 19q were found to be in agreement whereas concordance for 1p/19q codeletion and no 1p/19q codeletion was found in 94.7% (18 of 19) and 94.4% (17 of 18) of cases, respectively. Overall, comparing NGS results with those of conventional methods showed high concordance. In conclusion, the NGS panel allows reliable analysis of 1p/19q codeletion and mutation at the same time.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlae011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization has updated their classification system for the diagnosis of gliomas, combining histological features with molecular data including isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q. 1p/19q codeletion analysis is commonly performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, we developed a 57-gene targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including 1p/19q codeletion detection mainly to assess diagnosis and potential treatment response in melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and glioma patients. Loss of heterozygosity analysis was performed using the NGS method on 37 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded glioma tissues that showed 1p and/or 19q loss determined by FISH. Conventional methods were applied for the validation of some glioma-related gene mutations. In 81.1% (30 of 37) and 94.6% (35 of 37) of cases, 1p and 19q were found to be in agreement whereas concordance for 1p/19q codeletion and no 1p/19q codeletion was found in 94.7% (18 of 19) and 94.4% (17 of 18) of cases, respectively. Overall, comparing NGS results with those of conventional methods showed high concordance. In conclusion, the NGS panel allows reliable analysis of 1p/19q codeletion and mutation at the same time.

用于胶质瘤 1p/19q 编码缺失和突变分析的定制下一代测序面板。
世界卫生组织更新了胶质瘤诊断分类系统,将组织学特征与分子数据(包括异柠檬酸脱氢酶 1 和染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失)相结合。1p/19q 编码缺失分析通常通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)进行。在本研究中,我们开发了一个包含 1p/19q 缺失密码检测的 57 个基因靶向新一代测序(NGS)面板,主要用于评估黑色素瘤、胃肠道间质瘤和胶质瘤患者的诊断和潜在治疗反应。采用 NGS 方法对 37 例经 FISH 检测出 1p 和/或 19q 缺失的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋胶质瘤组织进行了杂合性缺失分析。一些胶质瘤相关基因突变的验证采用了常规方法。在 81.1%(37 例中的 30 例)和 94.6%(37 例中的 35 例)的病例中,发现 1p 和 19q 一致,而在 94.7%(19 例中的 18 例)和 94.4%(18 例中的 17 例)的病例中,分别发现 1p/19q 缺失和无 1p/19q 缺失。总体而言,将 NGS 结果与传统方法的结果进行比较显示出很高的一致性。总之,NGS 面板可同时可靠地分析 1p/19q 缺失和突变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信