New phosphorus losses via tile drainage depend on fertilizer form, placement, and timing

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
William Osterholz, Zach Simpson, Mark Williams, Vinayak Shedekar, Chad Penn, Kevin King
{"title":"New phosphorus losses via tile drainage depend on fertilizer form, placement, and timing","authors":"William Osterholz,&nbsp;Zach Simpson,&nbsp;Mark Williams,&nbsp;Vinayak Shedekar,&nbsp;Chad Penn,&nbsp;Kevin King","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agricultural phosphorus (P) losses are harmful to water quality, but knowledge gaps about the importance of fertilizer management practices on new (recently applied) sources of P may limit P loss mitigation efforts. Weighted regression models applied to subsurface tile drainage water quality data enabled estimating the new P losses associated with 155 P applications in Ohio and Indiana, USA. Daily discharge and dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) loads were used to detect increases in P loss following each application which was considered new P. The magnitude of new P losses was small relative to fertilizer application rates, averaging 79.3 g DRP ha<sup>−1</sup> and 96.1 g TP ha<sup>−1</sup>, or &lt;3% of P applied. The eight largest new P losses surpassed 330 g DRP ha<sup>−1</sup> or 575 g TP ha<sup>−1</sup>. New P loss mitigation strategies should focus on broadcast liquid manure applications; on average, manure applications caused greater new P losses than inorganic fertilizers, and surface broadcast applications were associated with greater new P losses than injected or incorporated applications. Late fall applications risked having large new P losses applications. On an annual basis, new P contributed an average of 14% of DRP and 5% of TP losses from tile drains, which is much less than previous studies that included surface runoff, suggesting that tile drainage is relatively buffered with regard to new P losses. Therefore old (preexisting soil P) P sources dominated tile drain P losses, and P loss reduction efforts will need to address this source.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.20549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural phosphorus (P) losses are harmful to water quality, but knowledge gaps about the importance of fertilizer management practices on new (recently applied) sources of P may limit P loss mitigation efforts. Weighted regression models applied to subsurface tile drainage water quality data enabled estimating the new P losses associated with 155 P applications in Ohio and Indiana, USA. Daily discharge and dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) loads were used to detect increases in P loss following each application which was considered new P. The magnitude of new P losses was small relative to fertilizer application rates, averaging 79.3 g DRP ha−1 and 96.1 g TP ha−1, or <3% of P applied. The eight largest new P losses surpassed 330 g DRP ha−1 or 575 g TP ha−1. New P loss mitigation strategies should focus on broadcast liquid manure applications; on average, manure applications caused greater new P losses than inorganic fertilizers, and surface broadcast applications were associated with greater new P losses than injected or incorporated applications. Late fall applications risked having large new P losses applications. On an annual basis, new P contributed an average of 14% of DRP and 5% of TP losses from tile drains, which is much less than previous studies that included surface runoff, suggesting that tile drainage is relatively buffered with regard to new P losses. Therefore old (preexisting soil P) P sources dominated tile drain P losses, and P loss reduction efforts will need to address this source.

通过瓦片排水造成的新磷损失取决于肥料的形式、施肥量和施肥时间。
农业磷(P)损失对水质有害,但有关肥料管理方法对新的(最近施用的)磷源的重要性的知识差距可能会限制磷损失缓解工作。将加权回归模型应用于美国俄亥俄州和印第安纳州的地下瓦片排水水质数据,可以估算出与 155 次施磷相关的新磷损失。与化肥施用量相比,新的钾损失量较小,平均为 79.3 克 DRP(每公顷-1)和 96.1 克 TP(每公顷-1),或-1 克 TP(每公顷-1)或 575 克 TP(每公顷-1)。新的减少钾损失策略应侧重于液体肥料的撒施;平均而言,施用肥料比施用无机肥料造成的新钾损失更大,地表撒施比喷施或掺混施用造成的新钾损失更大。晚秋施肥有可能造成大量新的钾损失。按年计算,新磷平均占瓦片排水中 DRP 流失量的 14%,占 TP 流失量的 5%,这比以前包括地表径流的研究要少得多,表明瓦片排水对新磷的流失具有相对的缓冲作用。因此,旧的(以前存在的土壤 P)P 来源在瓦片排水的 P 损失中占主导地位,减少 P 损失的工作需要解决这一来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信