Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis using hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Satoshi Nitta, Shuya Kandori, Reo Takahashi, Shuhei Suzuki, Kazuki Hamada, Kozaburo Tanuma, Masanobu Shiga, Kosuke Kojo, Shotaro Sakka, Yoshiyuki Nagumo, Akio Hoshi, Bryan J Mathis, Hiromitsu Negoro, Ayako Okuyama, Takahiro Higashi, Hiroyuki Nishiyama
{"title":"Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis using hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.","authors":"Satoshi Nitta, Shuya Kandori, Reo Takahashi, Shuhei Suzuki, Kazuki Hamada, Kozaburo Tanuma, Masanobu Shiga, Kosuke Kojo, Shotaro Sakka, Yoshiyuki Nagumo, Akio Hoshi, Bryan J Mathis, Hiromitsu Negoro, Ayako Okuyama, Takahiro Higashi, Hiroyuki Nishiyama","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors for overall survival of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Japanese hospital-based cancer registry database with a pivotal 10-year follow-up was used to identify and enroll patients, registered from 106 institutions, diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma in 2008-2009. Treating hospitals were divided by hospital care volume; high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals were defined as ≥ 4 and < 4 cases/year, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 men and 97 women were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common histological type was liposarcoma in 101 patients, followed by leiomyosarcoma in 38 patients. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 44.1 and 28.3%. The majority of patients (n = 152, 80.9%) were treated at low-volume hospitals. High-volume hospital patients had higher 10-year overall survival rates than low-volume hospital patients (51.2% vs 23.2%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed age over 60 years, treatment in low-volume hospitals and chemotherapy were independent predictors of unfavorable survival while treatment with surgery was an independent predictor of favorable survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possibility of surgical removal was suggested to be the most important prognostic factor for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Better survival was shown in patients treated at high-volume hospitals in our series.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We sought clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors for overall survival of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Japan.

Methods: A Japanese hospital-based cancer registry database with a pivotal 10-year follow-up was used to identify and enroll patients, registered from 106 institutions, diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma in 2008-2009. Treating hospitals were divided by hospital care volume; high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals were defined as ≥ 4 and < 4 cases/year, respectively.

Results: A total of 91 men and 97 women were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common histological type was liposarcoma in 101 patients, followed by leiomyosarcoma in 38 patients. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 44.1 and 28.3%. The majority of patients (n = 152, 80.9%) were treated at low-volume hospitals. High-volume hospital patients had higher 10-year overall survival rates than low-volume hospital patients (51.2% vs 23.2%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed age over 60 years, treatment in low-volume hospitals and chemotherapy were independent predictors of unfavorable survival while treatment with surgery was an independent predictor of favorable survival.

Conclusions: The possibility of surgical removal was suggested to be the most important prognostic factor for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Better survival was shown in patients treated at high-volume hospitals in our series.

腹膜后肉瘤:利用日本医院癌症登记数据进行的 10 年随访分析。
目的:研究日本腹膜后肉瘤的临床特征、生存结果和总生存率的预后因素:我们研究了日本腹膜后肉瘤的临床特征、生存结果以及总生存率的预后因素:方法:我们利用日本医院癌症登记数据库进行了为期 10 年的关键随访,以确定和登记 2008-2009 年期间在 106 家医院确诊为腹膜后肉瘤的患者。治疗医院按医院医疗量划分;高医疗量医院和低医疗量医院的定义分别为≥4和结果:共纳入 91 名男性和 97 名女性,中位年龄为 64 岁。最常见的组织学类型是脂肪肉瘤(101 例),其次是子宫肌瘤(38 例)。5年和10年总生存率分别为44.1%和28.3%。大多数患者(152人,80.9%)在低流量医院接受治疗。大医院患者的 10 年总生存率高于小医院患者(51.2% vs 23.2%,P = 0.026)。多变量分析显示,年龄超过60岁、在低流量医院接受治疗和化疗是预测不良生存率的独立因素,而手术治疗则是预测良好生存率的独立因素:结论:手术切除的可能性是腹膜后肉瘤最重要的预后因素。结论:手术切除的可能性是腹膜后肉瘤最重要的预后因素。在我们的系列研究中,在大医院接受治疗的患者生存率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信