Neurocognitive function as outcome and predictor for prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation in major depressive disorder: an analysis from the DepressionDC trial.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aldo Soldini, Ulrike Vogelmann, Sabine Aust, Stephan Goerigk, Christian Plewnia, Andreas Fallgatter, Claus Normann, Lukas Frase, Peter Zwanzger, Thomas Kammer, Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Gizem Vural, Malek Bajbouj, Frank Padberg, Gerrit Burkhardt
{"title":"Neurocognitive function as outcome and predictor for prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation in major depressive disorder: an analysis from the DepressionDC trial.","authors":"Aldo Soldini, Ulrike Vogelmann, Sabine Aust, Stephan Goerigk, Christian Plewnia, Andreas Fallgatter, Claus Normann, Lukas Frase, Peter Zwanzger, Thomas Kammer, Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Gizem Vural, Malek Bajbouj, Frank Padberg, Gerrit Burkhardt","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01759-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the prefrontal cortex might beneficially influence neurocognitive dysfunctions associated with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, previous studies of neurocognitive effects of tDCS have been inconclusive. In the current study, we analyzed longitudinal, neurocognitive data from 101 participants of a randomized controlled multicenter trial (DepressionDC), investigating the efficacy of bifrontal tDCS (2 mA, 30 min/d, for 6 weeks) in patients with MDD and insufficient response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). We assessed whether active tDCS compared to sham tDCS elicited beneficial effects across the domains of memory span, working memory, selective attention, sustained attention, executive process, and processing speed, assessed with a validated, digital test battery. Additionally, we explored whether baseline cognitive performance, as a proxy of fronto-parietal-network functioning, predicts the antidepressant effects of active tDCS versus sham tDCS. We found no statistically significant group differences in the change of neurocognitive performance between active and sham tDCS. Furthermore, baseline cognitive performance did not predict the clinical response to tDCS. Our findings indicate no advantage in neurocognition due to active tDCS in MDD. Additional research is required to systematically investigate the effects of tDCS protocols on neurocognitive performance in patients with MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1715-1724"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01759-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the prefrontal cortex might beneficially influence neurocognitive dysfunctions associated with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, previous studies of neurocognitive effects of tDCS have been inconclusive. In the current study, we analyzed longitudinal, neurocognitive data from 101 participants of a randomized controlled multicenter trial (DepressionDC), investigating the efficacy of bifrontal tDCS (2 mA, 30 min/d, for 6 weeks) in patients with MDD and insufficient response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). We assessed whether active tDCS compared to sham tDCS elicited beneficial effects across the domains of memory span, working memory, selective attention, sustained attention, executive process, and processing speed, assessed with a validated, digital test battery. Additionally, we explored whether baseline cognitive performance, as a proxy of fronto-parietal-network functioning, predicts the antidepressant effects of active tDCS versus sham tDCS. We found no statistically significant group differences in the change of neurocognitive performance between active and sham tDCS. Furthermore, baseline cognitive performance did not predict the clinical response to tDCS. Our findings indicate no advantage in neurocognition due to active tDCS in MDD. Additional research is required to systematically investigate the effects of tDCS protocols on neurocognitive performance in patients with MDD.

Abstract Image

神经认知功能作为前额叶经颅直流电刺激治疗重度抑郁症的结果和预测因素:DepressionDC 试验分析。
对前额叶皮层进行经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)可能会对与重度抑郁障碍(MDD)相关的神经认知功能障碍产生有益影响。然而,以往有关 tDCS 神经认知效应的研究尚无定论。在当前的研究中,我们分析了一项随机对照多中心试验(DepressionDC)中 101 名参与者的纵向神经认知数据,研究了双额叶 tDCS(2 毫安,30 分钟/天,6 周)对重度抑郁症患者的疗效,以及对选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的反应不足。我们评估了活性 tDCS 与假性 tDCS 相比,是否能在记忆广度、工作记忆、选择性注意、持续注意、执行过程和处理速度等方面产生有益的影响,这些影响是通过有效的数字测试电池进行评估的。此外,我们还探讨了基线认知表现(前顶叶网络功能的代表)是否能预测主动 tDCS 与假性 tDCS 的抗抑郁效果。我们发现,在神经认知能力的变化方面,主动和假性 tDCS 的组间差异无统计学意义。此外,基线认知表现并不能预测对 tDCS 的临床反应。我们的研究结果表明,在 MDD 患者中,主动 tDCS 在神经认知方面没有优势。要系统地研究 tDCS 方案对 MDD 患者神经认知能力的影响,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信