Survival difference between patients with single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes and the role of histology in pathological stage II-N1 non-small cell lung cancer.

Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2024.2322243
Julianne Ruiter, Adrianus de Langen, Kim Monkhorst, Alexander Veenhof, Houke Klomp, Jasper Smit, Egbert Smit, Ronald Damhuis, Koen Hartemink
{"title":"Survival difference between patients with single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes and the role of histology in pathological stage II-N1 non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Julianne Ruiter, Adrianus de Langen, Kim Monkhorst, Alexander Veenhof, Houke Klomp, Jasper Smit, Egbert Smit, Ronald Damhuis, Koen Hartemink","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2024.2322243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies investigating whether metastatic lymph node count is a relevant prognostic factor in pathological N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed conflicting results. Hypothesizing that outcome may also be related to histological features, we determined the prognostic impact of single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes in different histological subtypes for patients with stage II-N1 NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, including patients treated with a surgical resection for stage II-N1 NSCLC (TNM 7th edition) in 2010-2016. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for patients with single (pN1a) and multiple (pN1b) metastatic nodes. Using multivariable analysis, we compared OS between pN1a and pN1b in different histological subtypes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After complete resection of histologically proven stage II-N1 NSCLC, 1309 patients were analyzed, comprising 871 patients with pN1a and 438 with pN1b. The median number of pathologically examined nodes (N1 + N2) was 9 (interquartile range 6-13). Five-year OS was 53% for pN1a versus 51% for pN1b. In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly different between pN1a and pN1b (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40). When stratifying for histology, the prognostic impact of pN1a/b was only observed in adenocarcinoma patients (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with stage II-N1 adenocarcinoma, the presence of multiple metastatic nodes had a significant impact on survival, which was not observed for other histological subtypes. If further refinement as to lymph node count will be considered for incorporation into a new staging system, evaluation of the role of histology is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2322243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies investigating whether metastatic lymph node count is a relevant prognostic factor in pathological N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), showed conflicting results. Hypothesizing that outcome may also be related to histological features, we determined the prognostic impact of single versus multiple metastatic lymph nodes in different histological subtypes for patients with stage II-N1 NSCLC.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, including patients treated with a surgical resection for stage II-N1 NSCLC (TNM 7th edition) in 2010-2016. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for patients with single (pN1a) and multiple (pN1b) metastatic nodes. Using multivariable analysis, we compared OS between pN1a and pN1b in different histological subtypes.

Results: After complete resection of histologically proven stage II-N1 NSCLC, 1309 patients were analyzed, comprising 871 patients with pN1a and 438 with pN1b. The median number of pathologically examined nodes (N1 + N2) was 9 (interquartile range 6-13). Five-year OS was 53% for pN1a versus 51% for pN1b. In multivariable analysis, OS was significantly different between pN1a and pN1b (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40). When stratifying for histology, the prognostic impact of pN1a/b was only observed in adenocarcinoma patients (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.81).

Conclusion: Among patients with stage II-N1 adenocarcinoma, the presence of multiple metastatic nodes had a significant impact on survival, which was not observed for other histological subtypes. If further refinement as to lymph node count will be considered for incorporation into a new staging system, evaluation of the role of histology is recommended.

分享
查看原文
病理分期为 II-N1 期的非小细胞肺癌中,单个转移淋巴结与多个转移淋巴结患者的生存率差异以及组织学的作用。
背景:以前的研究调查了转移淋巴结数量是否是病理 N1 非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的相关预后因素,结果相互矛盾。我们推测预后也可能与组织学特征有关,因此确定了不同组织学亚型的单个与多个转移淋巴结对 II-N1 期 NSCLC 患者预后的影响:我们利用荷兰癌症登记处(Netherlands Cancer Registry)的数据开展了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象包括2010-2016年接受手术切除治疗的II-N1期NSCLC(TNM第7版)患者。我们评估了单个(pN1a)和多个(pN1b)转移性结节患者的总生存期(OS)。通过多变量分析,我们比较了不同组织学亚型中pN1a和pN1b的OS:在对组织学证实的II-N1期NSCLC患者进行完全切除后,我们对1309名患者进行了分析,其中包括871名pN1a患者和438名pN1b患者。病理检查结节(N1 + N2)的中位数为9个(四分位间范围为6-13)。pN1a患者的5年OS为53%,pN1b患者为51%。在多变量分析中,pN1a 和 pN1b 的 OS 显著不同(HR 1.19,95% CI 1.01-1.40)。在对组织学进行分层时,仅在腺癌患者中观察到pN1a/b对预后的影响(HR 1.44,95% CI 1.15-1.81):结论:在II-N1期腺癌患者中,存在多个转移淋巴结对生存有显著影响,而在其他组织学亚型中则没有观察到这种影响。如果考虑在新的分期系统中进一步完善淋巴结计数,建议对组织学的作用进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信