The Missing VP Illusion in Spanish: Assessing the Role of Language Statistics and Working Memory

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00118
Claudia Pañeda, S. Lago
{"title":"The Missing VP Illusion in Spanish: Assessing the Role of Language Statistics and Working Memory","authors":"Claudia Pañeda, S. Lago","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In English, double center-embedded sentences yield a so-called “missing VP illusion”: When they are ungrammatical due to a missing verb, they are judged as equally or even more acceptable than their grammatical counterparts. The illusion is often attributed to working memory limitations. Additionally, it has been suggested that statistical differences across languages—e.g., the lower frequency of consecutive verb clusters in verb-initial languages—play a role, since languages with verb-final embedded clauses are less susceptible to the illusion than English. In two speeded acceptability experiments, we demonstrate that the illusion arises in Spanish, a verb-initial language. We also find that the strength of the illusion is modulated by the number of consecutive verbs, consistent with the involvement of language statistics. By contrast, we do not find that participants’ working memory modulates the illusion, failing to support a role of memory limitations. Our results support the generalization that cross-linguistic variation in the missing VP illusion is associated with language statistics and verb position and they demonstrate that this is the case even in languages in which word order is not a reliable processing cue.","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"10 1","pages":"42-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In English, double center-embedded sentences yield a so-called “missing VP illusion”: When they are ungrammatical due to a missing verb, they are judged as equally or even more acceptable than their grammatical counterparts. The illusion is often attributed to working memory limitations. Additionally, it has been suggested that statistical differences across languages—e.g., the lower frequency of consecutive verb clusters in verb-initial languages—play a role, since languages with verb-final embedded clauses are less susceptible to the illusion than English. In two speeded acceptability experiments, we demonstrate that the illusion arises in Spanish, a verb-initial language. We also find that the strength of the illusion is modulated by the number of consecutive verbs, consistent with the involvement of language statistics. By contrast, we do not find that participants’ working memory modulates the illusion, failing to support a role of memory limitations. Our results support the generalization that cross-linguistic variation in the missing VP illusion is associated with language statistics and verb position and they demonstrate that this is the case even in languages in which word order is not a reliable processing cue.
西班牙语中缺失副词的错觉:评估语言统计和工作记忆的作用
摘要 在英语中,双中心嵌入式句子会产生所谓的 "缺失 VP 幻觉":当这些句子因缺少一个动词而不符合语法时,它们被判定为与符合语法的同类句子一样甚至更容易被接受。这种错觉通常归因于工作记忆的局限性。此外,还有人认为,不同语言之间的统计差异--例如,在动词首现的语言中,连续动词群的出现频率较低--也起到了一定的作用,因为与英语相比,动词末尾嵌入式从句的语言更不容易受到这种错觉的影响。在两个加速可接受性实验中,我们证明了这种错觉出现在西班牙语这种动词先行的语言中。我们还发现,错觉的强度受连续动词数量的调节,这与语言统计的参与是一致的。相比之下,我们没有发现参与者的工作记忆会调节错觉,因此不能证明记忆限制的作用。我们的研究结果支持这样一种概括,即缺失副词错觉的跨语言变异与语言统计和动词位置有关,而且这些结果表明,即使在词序不是可靠的加工线索的语言中,情况也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信