Interdecadal change and projection of the relationship between spring Arctic Oscillation and summer precipitation in the Yangtze River valley in CMIP6 models
IF 2.3 4区 地球科学Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
{"title":"Interdecadal change and projection of the relationship between spring Arctic Oscillation and summer precipitation in the Yangtze River valley in CMIP6 models","authors":"Weikai Jia, Botao Zhou, Ziyi Song","doi":"10.1016/j.aosl.2024.100481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper assesses the performance of 20 CMIP6 models in simulating the relationship between spring Arctic Oscillation (AO) and summer precipitation in the Yangtze River valley (YRP) over the period 1980–2014. Their relationship during 2015–2100 under SSP2-4.5 is also projected. The assessment indicates that four models (ACCESS-ESM1-5, CMC-CM2-SR5, MRI-ESM2-0, and NorESM2-LM) can reasonably simulate the observed interdecadal weakening of the AO–YRP connection in the late 1990s. During 1980–1998, corresponding to the positive phase of spring AO, the East Asian jet (EAJ) shifts northward in summer, favoring descending anomalies over the Yangtze River valley. Meanwhile, the western Pacific subtropical high is weaker than normal and anomalous northeasterlies prevail in the lower troposphere of the Yangtze River valley, reducing the water vapor transport to the target region. These situations are unfavorable for the occurrence of precipitation, consequently resulting in a decrease in summer YRP. During 1999–2014, however, the association of the above atmospheric circulations with spring AO becomes insignificant, thus diluting the AO–YRP connection. The ensemble of the four models projects that the significant out-of-phase relationship between spring AO and summer YRP will recover in the near term (2015–2040) and weaken again afterwards. Such projected relationships are supported by the changes in the linkage of summer atmospheric circulations to spring AO.</p><p>摘要</p><p>评估了20个CMIP6模式对春季北极涛动 (AO) 与长江流域夏季降水 (YRP) 关系的模拟能力. 结果表明, 4个模式 (ACCESS-ESM1-5, CMC-CM2-SR5, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2-LM)) 能合理模拟出1990年代后期AO–YRP关系的减弱. 1980–1998年, 当春季AO位于正位相时, 夏季东亚急流北移, 长江流域为异常下沉运动, 同时西太平洋副热带高压减弱, 减少向长江流域的水汽输送, 结果导致降水减少. 1999–2014年, 上述大气环流与春季AO的联系不显著, 从而减弱AO–YRP的关系. 利用这四个模式进一步预估了RCP4.5情景下2015–2100年期间AO–YRP的关系. 两者在2015–2040年为显著负相关关系, 随后再次减弱.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47210,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 100481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674283424000291/pdfft?md5=e023632f64924303b3a2ebb3031a3ae4&pid=1-s2.0-S1674283424000291-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674283424000291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper assesses the performance of 20 CMIP6 models in simulating the relationship between spring Arctic Oscillation (AO) and summer precipitation in the Yangtze River valley (YRP) over the period 1980–2014. Their relationship during 2015–2100 under SSP2-4.5 is also projected. The assessment indicates that four models (ACCESS-ESM1-5, CMC-CM2-SR5, MRI-ESM2-0, and NorESM2-LM) can reasonably simulate the observed interdecadal weakening of the AO–YRP connection in the late 1990s. During 1980–1998, corresponding to the positive phase of spring AO, the East Asian jet (EAJ) shifts northward in summer, favoring descending anomalies over the Yangtze River valley. Meanwhile, the western Pacific subtropical high is weaker than normal and anomalous northeasterlies prevail in the lower troposphere of the Yangtze River valley, reducing the water vapor transport to the target region. These situations are unfavorable for the occurrence of precipitation, consequently resulting in a decrease in summer YRP. During 1999–2014, however, the association of the above atmospheric circulations with spring AO becomes insignificant, thus diluting the AO–YRP connection. The ensemble of the four models projects that the significant out-of-phase relationship between spring AO and summer YRP will recover in the near term (2015–2040) and weaken again afterwards. Such projected relationships are supported by the changes in the linkage of summer atmospheric circulations to spring AO.