Ants are no bees – Gaps in the assessment of relevant exposure routes to pesticides and plant incorporated protectants

IF 9 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Marius Pohl , Udo Hommen , Sebastian Eilebrecht , Christoph Schäfers , Jürgen Gadau , Mathias Otto
{"title":"Ants are no bees – Gaps in the assessment of relevant exposure routes to pesticides and plant incorporated protectants","authors":"Marius Pohl ,&nbsp;Udo Hommen ,&nbsp;Sebastian Eilebrecht ,&nbsp;Christoph Schäfers ,&nbsp;Jürgen Gadau ,&nbsp;Mathias Otto","doi":"10.1016/j.enceco.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ants (Formicidae) are ubiquitous in terrestrial ecosystems, including agricultural areas and forests. They are important for soil movement, decomposition, nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, scavenging and seed dispersal. Furthermore, they serve as a crucial food source for various wildlife. However, ants are no part of current ecotoxicity testing. Here, we systematically analyze whether and how ants can be exposed to active substances from plant protection products (PPPs) or genetically modified plants (GMPs). Like other arthropods, ants can be exposed via direct contact with PPPs after application, inhalation, uptake of contaminated drinking water or diet. For plant incorporated protectants (PIPs) expressed by GMPs, dietary exposure is the only relevant exposure route. Ants exhibit a diverse dietary spectrum, including plant material, honey dew collection, fungal cultivation, scavenging, and predation. Notably, foraging for dead or weakened arthropods, e.g., treated pest organisms, represents a significant exposure route because such food may be readily available in large amounts after spraying a field. Arthropods, alive or deceased, serve as the dominant protein source for numerous ant species, essential for larval development and the egg production of the queen(s). Consequently, exposure routes, via contaminated food items, can jeopardize entire ant colonies if it reaches the queen. However, effects arising from contaminated prey are not routinely assessed, neither for non-social nor for social insects such as the honey bee, which collects only nectar and pollen and is intensively tested in the assessment of PPPs. We conclude that ecotoxicity testing in ants would fill a gap and support the assessment of biodiversity effects. To achieve this, we recommend further research to explore the exposure of the different castes and developmental stages of ants in greater detail and to develop protocols allowing for ecological risk assessments of PPPs and PIPs via dietary uptake. This comprehensive approach will contribute significantly to our understanding of the potential consequences of PPP and GMP exposure to non-target ants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100480,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 71-80"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000043/pdfft?md5=861cbcbfe4cdbd5a3105728d2bee8f07&pid=1-s2.0-S2590182624000043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590182624000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ants (Formicidae) are ubiquitous in terrestrial ecosystems, including agricultural areas and forests. They are important for soil movement, decomposition, nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, scavenging and seed dispersal. Furthermore, they serve as a crucial food source for various wildlife. However, ants are no part of current ecotoxicity testing. Here, we systematically analyze whether and how ants can be exposed to active substances from plant protection products (PPPs) or genetically modified plants (GMPs). Like other arthropods, ants can be exposed via direct contact with PPPs after application, inhalation, uptake of contaminated drinking water or diet. For plant incorporated protectants (PIPs) expressed by GMPs, dietary exposure is the only relevant exposure route. Ants exhibit a diverse dietary spectrum, including plant material, honey dew collection, fungal cultivation, scavenging, and predation. Notably, foraging for dead or weakened arthropods, e.g., treated pest organisms, represents a significant exposure route because such food may be readily available in large amounts after spraying a field. Arthropods, alive or deceased, serve as the dominant protein source for numerous ant species, essential for larval development and the egg production of the queen(s). Consequently, exposure routes, via contaminated food items, can jeopardize entire ant colonies if it reaches the queen. However, effects arising from contaminated prey are not routinely assessed, neither for non-social nor for social insects such as the honey bee, which collects only nectar and pollen and is intensively tested in the assessment of PPPs. We conclude that ecotoxicity testing in ants would fill a gap and support the assessment of biodiversity effects. To achieve this, we recommend further research to explore the exposure of the different castes and developmental stages of ants in greater detail and to develop protocols allowing for ecological risk assessments of PPPs and PIPs via dietary uptake. This comprehensive approach will contribute significantly to our understanding of the potential consequences of PPP and GMP exposure to non-target ants.

蚂蚁不是蜜蜂--农药和植物掺入保护剂相关暴露途径评估中的差距
蚂蚁(蚁科)在陆地生态系统中无处不在,包括农业区和森林。它们对土壤移动、分解、养分循环、授粉、捕食、清扫和种子传播非常重要。此外,它们还是各种野生动物的重要食物来源。然而,目前的生态毒性测试并不包括蚂蚁。在这里,我们系统地分析了蚂蚁是否以及如何暴露于植物保护产品(PPP)或转基因植物(GMP)中的活性物质。与其他节肢动物一样,蚂蚁可以通过施用、吸入、摄入受污染的饮用水或饮食等方式直接接触植物保护产品。对于由 GMPs 表达的植物结合保护剂 (PIPs),饮食接触是唯一相关的接触途径。蚂蚁的食谱多种多样,包括植物材料、蜜露采集、真菌培养、食腐和捕食。值得注意的是,觅食死亡或衰弱的节肢动物(如经过处理的害虫)是一种重要的接触途径,因为在田间喷洒农药后,这些食物可能会大量出现。节肢动物,无论是活的还是死的,都是许多蚂蚁物种的主要蛋白质来源,对幼虫发育和蚁后产卵至关重要。因此,如果蚁后接触到受污染的食物,就会危及整个蚁群。然而,无论是对非社会性昆虫还是社会性昆虫(如蜜蜂)来说,受污染的猎物所产生的影响都没有得到常规评估,蜜蜂只采集花蜜和花粉,并在购买力平价评估中进行了大量测试。我们的结论是,在蚂蚁中进行生态毒性测试将填补空白,并支持对生物多样性影响的评估。为此,我们建议开展进一步研究,更详细地探索不同种群和发育阶段蚂蚁的暴露情况,并制定相关规程,以便通过饮食摄入对购买力平价和购买力平价进行生态风险评估。这种综合方法将大大有助于我们了解接触 PPP 和 GMP 对非目标蚂蚁的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信