The Spemann-Mangold organizer discovery and society

IF 3.9 4区 生物学 Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
{"title":"The Spemann-Mangold organizer discovery and society","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cdev.2024.203906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analyzes the influence of Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold's discovery of the embryonic organizer on society outside the narrower confines of embryology. It begins by overviewing how in the 1920s–1930s, the organizer discovery fit well into the agenda of both right-wing and left-wing political camps, as it supported holistic theories of biological development that aligned with their ideological views. The paper then explores the organizer's influence on the formation and interdisciplinary discussions of the 1930s Cambridge Theoretical Biology Club. Club member C.H. Waddington's concept of the epigenetic landscape, inspired in part by Spemann and Mangold's work, went on to impact diverse fields including mathematics, psychology, anthropology, architecture, and art. Examples include mathematician René Thom's catastrophe landscapes and the field of ekistics (the science of human settlements). Spemann and Mangold's creation of an embryo chimera by combining tissues from different newt species also helped shape philosophers' and artists' understanding of the relationship between nature and technology as an integrated whole rather than separate entities. Additionally, Spemann's embryonic field concept helped influence field theories in other areas of science, and thinkers have pointed out metaphorical similarities between the organizer experiment and philosophical dialectics, film editing, or historical events. However, several factors likely limited the long-term societal impact of Spemann's holistic perspective, notably the rise of molecular biology and DNA-centric reductionist views of biology in the mid-late 20th century. While such reductionism still dominates public perceptions of biology, there seems to be a renewed openness to holistic perspectives reminiscent of Spemann's views.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36123,"journal":{"name":"Cells and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729012400007X/pdfft?md5=041baec31ebd47b7a2938c41d23e9bea&pid=1-s2.0-S266729012400007X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cells and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266729012400007X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyzes the influence of Hans Spemann and Hilde Mangold's discovery of the embryonic organizer on society outside the narrower confines of embryology. It begins by overviewing how in the 1920s–1930s, the organizer discovery fit well into the agenda of both right-wing and left-wing political camps, as it supported holistic theories of biological development that aligned with their ideological views. The paper then explores the organizer's influence on the formation and interdisciplinary discussions of the 1930s Cambridge Theoretical Biology Club. Club member C.H. Waddington's concept of the epigenetic landscape, inspired in part by Spemann and Mangold's work, went on to impact diverse fields including mathematics, psychology, anthropology, architecture, and art. Examples include mathematician René Thom's catastrophe landscapes and the field of ekistics (the science of human settlements). Spemann and Mangold's creation of an embryo chimera by combining tissues from different newt species also helped shape philosophers' and artists' understanding of the relationship between nature and technology as an integrated whole rather than separate entities. Additionally, Spemann's embryonic field concept helped influence field theories in other areas of science, and thinkers have pointed out metaphorical similarities between the organizer experiment and philosophical dialectics, film editing, or historical events. However, several factors likely limited the long-term societal impact of Spemann's holistic perspective, notably the rise of molecular biology and DNA-centric reductionist views of biology in the mid-late 20th century. While such reductionism still dominates public perceptions of biology, there seems to be a renewed openness to holistic perspectives reminiscent of Spemann's views.

斯佩曼-曼戈尔德组织者的发现与社会
本文分析了汉斯-斯佩曼(Hans Spemann)和希尔德-曼戈尔德(Hilde Mangold)发现的胚胎组织器对狭义胚胎学之外的社会的影响。论文首先概述了在二十世纪二十年代至三十年代,胚胎组织器的发现是如何与右翼和左翼政治阵营的议程相吻合的,因为它支持符合他们意识形态观点的生物发育整体理论。本文随后探讨了组织者对 20 世纪 30 年代剑桥理论生物学俱乐部的成立和跨学科讨论的影响。俱乐部成员 C.H. 瓦丁顿(C.H. Waddington)的 "表观遗传景观"(epigenetic landscape)概念部分受到了斯佩曼和曼戈尔德工作的启发,并对数学、心理学、人类学、建筑学和艺术等多个领域产生了影响。例如数学家勒内-托姆(René Thom)的灾难景观(castrophe landscapes)和人类居住科学(ekistics)领域。斯佩曼和曼戈尔德将不同蝾螈物种的组织结合在一起,创造出胚胎嵌合体,这也有助于哲学家和艺术家将自然与技术之间的关系理解为一个整体,而不是独立的实体。此外,斯佩曼的胚胎场概念还影响了其他科学领域的场理论,思想家们指出了组织者实验与哲学辩证法、电影剪辑或历史事件之间的隐喻相似性。然而,有几个因素可能限制了斯佩曼的整体观对社会的长期影响,特别是分子生物学和以 DNA 为中心的生物学还原论在 20 世纪中后期的兴起。虽然这种还原论仍然主导着公众对生物学的看法,但人们似乎重新对斯佩曼的整体观持开放态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cells and Development
Cells and Development Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Developmental Biology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信