{"title":"Increases in the incremental exercise mean response time across the steady state domain: Implications for exercise testing & prescription","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We hypothesized that slowed oxygen uptake (<span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span>) kinetics for exercise transitions to higher power outputs (PO) within the steady state (SS) domain would increase the mean response time (MRT) with increasing exercise intensity during incremental exercise. Fourteen highly trained cyclists (mean ± standard deviation [<em>SD</em>]; age (39 ± 6) years [yr]; and <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> peak = (61 ± 9) mL/kg/min performed a maximal, ramp incremental cycling test and on separate days, four 6-min bouts of cycling at 30%, 45%, 65% & 75% of their incremental peak PO (Wpeak). SS trial data were used to calculate the MRT and verified by mono-exponential and linear curve fitting. When the ramp protocol attained the value from SS, the PO, in Watts (W), was converted to time (min) based on the ramp function W to quantify the incremental MRT (iMRT). Slope analyses for the <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> responses of the SS versus incremental exercise data below the gas exchange threshold (GET) revealed a significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.003; [0.437 ± 0.08] vs. [0.382 ± 0.05] L⋅min<sup>−1</sup>). There was a significant difference between the 45% Wpeak steady state <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (ss <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span>) ([3.08 ± 0.30] L⋅min<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), and 30% Wpeak ss <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> (2.26 ± 0.24) (<em>p</em> < 0.0001; [3.61 ± 0.80] vs. [2.20 ± 0.39] L⋅min<sup>−1</sup>) and between the iMRT for 45% and 30% Wpeak ss <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> values ([50.58 ± 36.85] s vs. [32.20 ± 43.28] s). These data indicate there is no single iMRT, which is consistent with slowed <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> kinetics and an increasing <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span> deficit for higher exercise intensities within the SS domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 315-323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000234/pdfft?md5=1d26c912f1aa34fef67f96affc761834&pid=1-s2.0-S2666337624000234-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We hypothesized that slowed oxygen uptake () kinetics for exercise transitions to higher power outputs (PO) within the steady state (SS) domain would increase the mean response time (MRT) with increasing exercise intensity during incremental exercise. Fourteen highly trained cyclists (mean ± standard deviation [SD]; age (39 ± 6) years [yr]; and peak = (61 ± 9) mL/kg/min performed a maximal, ramp incremental cycling test and on separate days, four 6-min bouts of cycling at 30%, 45%, 65% & 75% of their incremental peak PO (Wpeak). SS trial data were used to calculate the MRT and verified by mono-exponential and linear curve fitting. When the ramp protocol attained the value from SS, the PO, in Watts (W), was converted to time (min) based on the ramp function W to quantify the incremental MRT (iMRT). Slope analyses for the responses of the SS versus incremental exercise data below the gas exchange threshold (GET) revealed a significant difference (p = 0.003; [0.437 ± 0.08] vs. [0.382 ± 0.05] L⋅min−1). There was a significant difference between the 45% Wpeak steady state (ss ) ([3.08 ± 0.30] L⋅min−1, respectively), and 30% Wpeak ss (2.26 ± 0.24) (p < 0.0001; [3.61 ± 0.80] vs. [2.20 ± 0.39] L⋅min−1) and between the iMRT for 45% and 30% Wpeak ss values ([50.58 ± 36.85] s vs. [32.20 ± 43.28] s). These data indicate there is no single iMRT, which is consistent with slowed kinetics and an increasing deficit for higher exercise intensities within the SS domain.