Cognitive, behavioral, and affective mechanisms underlying the efficacy of Applied Relaxation in reducing psychopathological symptoms: A randomized controlled trial

Eva Asselmann , Frank Rückert , Hanna Kische , Monique Zenker , Lars Pieper , Katja Beesdo-Baum
{"title":"Cognitive, behavioral, and affective mechanisms underlying the efficacy of Applied Relaxation in reducing psychopathological symptoms: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Eva Asselmann ,&nbsp;Frank Rückert ,&nbsp;Hanna Kische ,&nbsp;Monique Zenker ,&nbsp;Lars Pieper ,&nbsp;Katja Beesdo-Baum","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2024.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study examined the cognitive, behavioral, and affective mechanisms underlying the efficacy of Applied Relaxation (AR) in reducing psychopathological symptoms. AR is a cognitive-behavioral technique that allows for rapid relaxation at the first sign of stress or tension in daily life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 277 adults (18–55 years) with elevated symptoms of depression, anxiety, or stress but without a 12-month DSM-5 mental disorder at study entry. Participants were randomized to an intervention group receiving AR training (10 weeks, N = 139) and an assessment-only control group (N = 138). Mental health outcomes (depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms) and potential cognitive (self-efficacy, perceived control), behavioral (coping behaviors) and affective (positive and negative affect) mediators of the intervention efficacy were assessed at baseline and post-assessment in both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Structural equation models indicated that baseline to post reductions in psychopathological symptoms due to AR partially passed through less avoidance-oriented and less other dysfunctional coping (proportion of total effect mediated; ratio of indirect to total effect: resignation: 55.0%, rumination: 27.9%, escape: 27.4%, aggression: 21.3%), less negative affect (46.3%), more positive affect (41.8%), lower external control beliefs (14.5%), and higher self-efficacy (13.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results suggest that improvements in cognitive, behavioral, and affective mediator variables partially explain the intervention efficacy of AR in improving mental health.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration and data statement</h3><p>The study protocol has been pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03311529). The study protocol, minimum dataset, and analysis codes are available at OpARA - Open Access Repository and Archive. Supplementary materials (e.g., the course manual and additional training materials) are available on request from the last author ([email protected]).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000099/pdfft?md5=cb07cef1960460dede381e82364672ab&pid=1-s2.0-S2950004424000099-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004424000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study examined the cognitive, behavioral, and affective mechanisms underlying the efficacy of Applied Relaxation (AR) in reducing psychopathological symptoms. AR is a cognitive-behavioral technique that allows for rapid relaxation at the first sign of stress or tension in daily life.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 277 adults (18–55 years) with elevated symptoms of depression, anxiety, or stress but without a 12-month DSM-5 mental disorder at study entry. Participants were randomized to an intervention group receiving AR training (10 weeks, N = 139) and an assessment-only control group (N = 138). Mental health outcomes (depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms) and potential cognitive (self-efficacy, perceived control), behavioral (coping behaviors) and affective (positive and negative affect) mediators of the intervention efficacy were assessed at baseline and post-assessment in both groups.

Results

Structural equation models indicated that baseline to post reductions in psychopathological symptoms due to AR partially passed through less avoidance-oriented and less other dysfunctional coping (proportion of total effect mediated; ratio of indirect to total effect: resignation: 55.0%, rumination: 27.9%, escape: 27.4%, aggression: 21.3%), less negative affect (46.3%), more positive affect (41.8%), lower external control beliefs (14.5%), and higher self-efficacy (13.3%).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that improvements in cognitive, behavioral, and affective mediator variables partially explain the intervention efficacy of AR in improving mental health.

Trial registration and data statement

The study protocol has been pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03311529). The study protocol, minimum dataset, and analysis codes are available at OpARA - Open Access Repository and Archive. Supplementary materials (e.g., the course manual and additional training materials) are available on request from the last author ([email protected]).

认知、行为和情感机制是应用放松法减少精神病理症状疗效的基础:随机对照试验
背景本研究探讨了应用放松(AR)在减轻精神病理症状方面的认知、行为和情感机制。方法:本研究对 277 名成人(18-55 岁)进行了随机对照试验,这些成人的抑郁、焦虑或压力症状有所加重,但在研究开始时未患有 12 个月的 DSM-5 精神障碍。参与者被随机分为接受 AR 培训的干预组(10 周,139 人)和仅接受评估的对照组(138 人)。在基线和评估后,对两组的心理健康结果(抑郁、焦虑和压力症状)以及干预效果的潜在认知(自我效能、感知控制)、行为(应对行为)和情感(积极和消极情感)中介因素进行了评估。结果结构方程模型显示,从基线到评估后,心理病理症状的减轻部分是通过减少回避型应对和其他功能失调型应对实现的(总效果中介比例;间接效果与总效果之比:辞职:55.0%;反刍:55.0%):55.0%、反刍:27.9%、逃避:27.4%、攻击:21.3%)、更少的消极情绪(46.3%)、更多的积极情绪(41.8%)、更低的外部控制信念(14.5%)和更高的自我效能感(13.3%)。结论我们的研究结果表明,认知、行为和情感中介变量的改善可以部分解释 AR 在改善心理健康方面的干预效果。试验注册和数据声明该研究方案已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了预注册(NCT03311529)。研究方案、最小数据集和分析代码可在 OpARA - 开放存取资料库和档案馆查阅。补充材料(如课程手册和其他培训材料)可向最后一位作者索取([email protected])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信