Study of Consumption and Disposal Practices Related to Polythene Shopping Bags

Karunaratne C.M.W., Gunawardena U.A.D.P.
{"title":"Study of Consumption and Disposal Practices Related to Polythene Shopping Bags","authors":"Karunaratne C.M.W., Gunawardena U.A.D.P.","doi":"10.31357/fesympo.v27.7025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe widespread use of polythene shopping bags raises significant environmental concerns about adverse effects to marine ecosystems, wild life and impacts resulting from litter all of which require public resources to mitigate or manage. The main objective of this study is to understand the consumer behaviour on polythene bag usage, their awareness on adverse impacts and their willingness to pay for a tax on reducing polythene bag usage. Data were collected from 100 respondents selected from different locations in Sri Lanka conveniently using a structured online questionnaire. In investigating an economic instruments for reducing pollution from polythene bags, payment from the polluter was obtained from two different methods such increasing the price of the polythene bag and imposing a tax on production of polythene shopping bags. In this analysis, it was considered two different dependent variables and the four independent variables. Those dependent variables are willingness to pay for polythene shopping bag and imposing tax on production. Four independent variables were considered for each regression models such as Household income, number of times of usage of polythene shopping bags, environmental impacts and adequacy about government initiatives. The results indicate that among the respondents 86% have all types of polythene waste and 81% separate polythene waste from their collected waste stream, 60% sort polythene waste as clean and unclean before disposal, 61.50% hand over polythene waste to municipal solid waste collectors and 18% of respondents dump the garbage pit in the backyard and 13% of respondents burn it. Most (85%) of respondents don‘t agree that burning polythene is harmful to life and 92% don‘t agree that dumping polythene bags to garbage pits will provide breeding grounds to mosquitos. Majority is using the bags only one or two times but printed /branded bags are being used one to five times. Majority (36%) of respondents suggests a tax of Rs. 5.00 to pay for a polythene shopping bag which can carry 2-3kg per bag and 31 per cent respondents suggested Rs. 2.00. Most of the respondents prefer to switch to a bio-degradable or reusable bag completely if the government put a blanket ban on polythene. The study suggests that educating and making awareness related to the usage and disposal practices related to the polythene shopping bags is very important for the behaviour of the consumer. Introducing an economic instrument related to increasing the price of the polythene shopping bag or imposing a tax at the production or switch to a reusable bag or any other environmentally friendly alternative as a substitute for polythene shopping bags would be a timely action as the majority of the selected sample is ready and willing to embrace these alternatives. \nKeywords: Polythene, Shopping bags, Reusable, Consumer behaviour, Price \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":205644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/fesympo.v27.7025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of polythene shopping bags raises significant environmental concerns about adverse effects to marine ecosystems, wild life and impacts resulting from litter all of which require public resources to mitigate or manage. The main objective of this study is to understand the consumer behaviour on polythene bag usage, their awareness on adverse impacts and their willingness to pay for a tax on reducing polythene bag usage. Data were collected from 100 respondents selected from different locations in Sri Lanka conveniently using a structured online questionnaire. In investigating an economic instruments for reducing pollution from polythene bags, payment from the polluter was obtained from two different methods such increasing the price of the polythene bag and imposing a tax on production of polythene shopping bags. In this analysis, it was considered two different dependent variables and the four independent variables. Those dependent variables are willingness to pay for polythene shopping bag and imposing tax on production. Four independent variables were considered for each regression models such as Household income, number of times of usage of polythene shopping bags, environmental impacts and adequacy about government initiatives. The results indicate that among the respondents 86% have all types of polythene waste and 81% separate polythene waste from their collected waste stream, 60% sort polythene waste as clean and unclean before disposal, 61.50% hand over polythene waste to municipal solid waste collectors and 18% of respondents dump the garbage pit in the backyard and 13% of respondents burn it. Most (85%) of respondents don‘t agree that burning polythene is harmful to life and 92% don‘t agree that dumping polythene bags to garbage pits will provide breeding grounds to mosquitos. Majority is using the bags only one or two times but printed /branded bags are being used one to five times. Majority (36%) of respondents suggests a tax of Rs. 5.00 to pay for a polythene shopping bag which can carry 2-3kg per bag and 31 per cent respondents suggested Rs. 2.00. Most of the respondents prefer to switch to a bio-degradable or reusable bag completely if the government put a blanket ban on polythene. The study suggests that educating and making awareness related to the usage and disposal practices related to the polythene shopping bags is very important for the behaviour of the consumer. Introducing an economic instrument related to increasing the price of the polythene shopping bag or imposing a tax at the production or switch to a reusable bag or any other environmentally friendly alternative as a substitute for polythene shopping bags would be a timely action as the majority of the selected sample is ready and willing to embrace these alternatives. Keywords: Polythene, Shopping bags, Reusable, Consumer behaviour, Price
有关聚乙烯购物袋的消费和处置方式的研究
聚乙烯购物袋的广泛使用引起了人们对环境问题的极大关注,包括对海洋生态系统、野生生物的不利影响以及垃圾造成的影响,所有这些都需要公共资源来缓解或管理。本研究的主要目的是了解消费者使用聚乙烯购物袋的行为、他们对不利影响的认识以及他们是否愿意为减少聚乙烯购物袋的使用支付税款。研究采用结构化在线问卷调查的方式,从斯里兰卡不同地区选取了 100 名受访者,方便地收集了数据。在调查减少聚乙烯袋污染的经济手段时,污染者的付款来自两种不同的方法,如提高聚乙烯袋的价格和对聚乙烯购物袋的生产征税。在本分析中,考虑了两个不同的因变量和四个自变量。这些因变量分别是购买聚乙烯购物袋的支付意愿和对生产征税。每个回归模型都考虑了四个自变量,如家庭收入、使用聚乙烯购物袋的次数、环境影响和对政府举措的充分认识。结果表明,86% 的受访者拥有各种类型的聚乙烯垃圾,81% 的受访者将聚乙烯垃圾从其收集的垃圾流中分离出来,60% 的受访者在处理聚乙烯垃圾前将其分为干净和不干净两种,61.50% 的受访者将聚乙烯垃圾交给城市固体废物收集者,18% 的受访者将垃圾倾倒在后院的垃圾坑中,13% 的受访者将其焚烧。大多数受访者(85%)不同意焚烧聚乙烯对生命有害,92% 的受访者不同意将聚乙烯袋倾倒在垃圾坑里会给蚊子提供滋生地。大多数受访者只使用聚乙烯袋一到两次,但印刷袋/品牌袋的使用次数为一到五次。大多数受访者(36%)建议对每袋可装 2-3 公斤的聚乙烯购物袋征税 5.00 卢比,31% 的受访者建议征税 2.00 卢比。如果政府全面禁止使用聚乙烯购物袋,大多数受访者倾向于完全改用生物可降解或可重复使用的购物袋。研究表明,对消费者的行为进行教育,提高他们对使用和处理聚乙烯购物袋的认识非常重要。引入与提高聚乙烯购物袋价格相关的经济手段,或在生产过程中征税,或改用可重复使用的购物袋或任何其他环保型替代品作为聚乙烯购物袋的替代品,将是一项及时的行动,因为所选样本中的大多数人已经准备好并愿意接受这些替代品。关键词聚乙烯 购物袋 可重复使用 消费者行为 价格
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信