Assessment of the Potential to Promote Nature-based Tourism Industry in the Protected Area Network of Sri Lanka

Wijethunga A.R.L., Subasinghe D.
{"title":"Assessment of the Potential to Promote Nature-based Tourism Industry in the Protected Area Network of Sri Lanka","authors":"Wijethunga A.R.L., Subasinghe D.","doi":"10.31357/fesympo.v27.7114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nPromoting the tourism industry is one of the proven strategies for Sri Lanka to address current economic crises. Sri Lanka has a high potential to develop nature-based tourism with its high biodiversity. The Forest Department and the Department of Wildlife Conservation manage 30% of the country's land as Protected Areas. In comparison to the tourism income generated through archeological sites of the country, the biodiversity sector has earned 83%-90% from 2012 to 2016, without any significant promotions and it shows the potential to develop nature-based tourism. This study aimed to examine the potentiality of using the Protected Area network to promote nature- based tourism. The PESTEL approach was utilized to assess the potentiality, and primary data was gathered through ten structured Key Informant Interviews of senior officials of both the destination management agencies, tourism authorities, and experts. The secondary data were obtained by reviewing official reports and records. The Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance, Forest Ordinance, and their amendments provide legal provisions relating to tourism in Protected Areas with certain limitations. The Wildlife Preservation Fund can be utilized for conservation and development activities in protected areas, including tourism promotion. Even if a higher degree of ̳tourism friendly‘ provisions is available with the Forest Department, there is no mechanism for utilizing the income generated through tourism activities for conservation as revenue credits to the Treasury. Insufficient financial allocation through the treasury, lack of innovative financial solutions for resource mobilization, and ineffective governance mechanisms for promoting public- private partnerships are identified as challenging factors in forest and biodiversity conservation in protected areas. This leads to environmental degradation and biodiversity loss in the country. The study found the potentiality of developing projects worth one billion LKR per annum with more than 20% internal rate of return, if the government develops a mechanism that increases the \n \n \n \n \nbenefits/incentives available for the Forest Department from tourism, ensures cooperation and \n \n \n \n \ncomprehensive planning among both the departments, introduce innovative sustainable financing solutions, amend the policy and institutional framework in favour of public, private community partnerships, and develop a tourism promotion roadmap for both the Departments. Such initiatives would increase the socioeconomic and environmental benefits to the communities living in the Functional Resource Unit of the Protected Areas. It could be strengthened with an innovative Protected Area management model such as the community forestry approach. The study recommends that tourism should be considered an effective entry point for sustainable use, biodiversity conservation, and economic growth at local and national levels. \n \n \n \n \nKeywords: Protected areas, Nature-based tourism, Innovative financing, Public-private partnerships, Tourism for conservation \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":205644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of International Forestry and Environment Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/fesympo.v27.7114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promoting the tourism industry is one of the proven strategies for Sri Lanka to address current economic crises. Sri Lanka has a high potential to develop nature-based tourism with its high biodiversity. The Forest Department and the Department of Wildlife Conservation manage 30% of the country's land as Protected Areas. In comparison to the tourism income generated through archeological sites of the country, the biodiversity sector has earned 83%-90% from 2012 to 2016, without any significant promotions and it shows the potential to develop nature-based tourism. This study aimed to examine the potentiality of using the Protected Area network to promote nature- based tourism. The PESTEL approach was utilized to assess the potentiality, and primary data was gathered through ten structured Key Informant Interviews of senior officials of both the destination management agencies, tourism authorities, and experts. The secondary data were obtained by reviewing official reports and records. The Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance, Forest Ordinance, and their amendments provide legal provisions relating to tourism in Protected Areas with certain limitations. The Wildlife Preservation Fund can be utilized for conservation and development activities in protected areas, including tourism promotion. Even if a higher degree of ̳tourism friendly‘ provisions is available with the Forest Department, there is no mechanism for utilizing the income generated through tourism activities for conservation as revenue credits to the Treasury. Insufficient financial allocation through the treasury, lack of innovative financial solutions for resource mobilization, and ineffective governance mechanisms for promoting public- private partnerships are identified as challenging factors in forest and biodiversity conservation in protected areas. This leads to environmental degradation and biodiversity loss in the country. The study found the potentiality of developing projects worth one billion LKR per annum with more than 20% internal rate of return, if the government develops a mechanism that increases the benefits/incentives available for the Forest Department from tourism, ensures cooperation and comprehensive planning among both the departments, introduce innovative sustainable financing solutions, amend the policy and institutional framework in favour of public, private community partnerships, and develop a tourism promotion roadmap for both the Departments. Such initiatives would increase the socioeconomic and environmental benefits to the communities living in the Functional Resource Unit of the Protected Areas. It could be strengthened with an innovative Protected Area management model such as the community forestry approach. The study recommends that tourism should be considered an effective entry point for sustainable use, biodiversity conservation, and economic growth at local and national levels. Keywords: Protected areas, Nature-based tourism, Innovative financing, Public-private partnerships, Tourism for conservation
评估在斯里兰卡保护区网络中促进以自然为基础的旅游业的潜力
促进旅游业是斯里兰卡应对当前经济危机的行之有效的战略之一。斯里兰卡拥有丰富的生物多样性,发展以自然为基础的旅游业潜力巨大。林业部和野生动物保护部将全国 30% 的土地作为保护区进行管理。与该国通过考古遗址产生的旅游收入相比,生物多样性部门从 2012 年到 2016 年在没有任何重大促销活动的情况下赚取了 83%-90% 的收入,这显示了发展以自然为基础的旅游业的潜力。本研究旨在探讨利用保护区网络促进自然旅游的潜力。研究采用了 PESTEL 方法来评估潜力,并通过对目的地管理机构、旅游当局的高级官员和专家进行十次结构化关键信息访谈来收集第一手数据。二手数据则通过查阅官方报告和记录获得。动植物保护条例》、《森林条例》及其修正案规定了与保护区旅游业相关的法律条款,但有一定的限制。野生动物保护基金可用于保护区的保护和发展活动,包括旅游推广。即使林业部制定了更高程度的 "旅游友好 "规定,也没有机制将旅游活动产生的收入作为国库收入贷项用于保护。在保护区的森林和生物多样性保护方面,国库财政拨款不足、缺乏调动资源的创新金融解决方案以及促进公私合作伙伴关系的治理机制效率低下被认为是具有挑战性的因素。这导致了该国的环境退化和生物多样性丧失。研究发现,如果政府建立一种机制,增加林业部门从旅游业中获得的利益/奖励,确保两个部门之间的合作和全面规划,引入创新的可持续融资解决方案,修订有利于公私社区伙伴关系的政策和制度框架,并为两个部门制定旅游推广路线图,那么每年就有可能开发出价值 10 亿斯里兰卡卢比的项目,内部回报率超过 20%。这些举措将增加生活在保护区功能资源单元的社区的社会经济和环境效益。可以通过创新的保护区管理模式(如社区林业方法)来加强旅游业。研究建议,应将旅游业视为地方和国家层面实现可持续利用、生物多样性保护和经济增长的有效切入点。 关键词保护区 基于自然的旅游业 创新融资 公私伙伴关系 保护旅游业
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信