Modified diff-quick staining for canine sperm morphology

Mariana P Mazzuchini, Guilherme Novello, Lorenzo  Segabinazzi
{"title":"Modified diff-quick staining for canine sperm morphology","authors":"Mariana P Mazzuchini, Guilherme Novello, Lorenzo  Segabinazzi","doi":"10.58292/ct.v16.10243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sperm morphology assessment requires specialized microscopes or stains. Diff-quick (DQ) is considered a universal stain that is cost-effective; however, morphological evaluation of sperm using DQ staining is poor and not encouraging. Therefore, this study investigated modifications to the DQ protocol to improve identification of morphological defects of dog sperm and compared the modified DQ techniques with eosin-nigrosin, Karras, and differential interference contrast microscopy [DIC]). One ejaculate from each of 9 dogs was used. To perform the proposed modified DQ techniques (DQ1 and DQ2), dried semen smears were fixed by immersing for 10 seconds in solution 1 of DQ and 5 minutes each in solutions II and III of the kit. After the third stain solution, slides in DQ1 were rinsed in water whereas slides in DQ2 were not rinsed but were vertically supported to facilitate stain drainage. Results suggested that the standard DQ protocol overestimated normal sperm and detached heads whereas underestimated abnormal heads and total defects compared to DIC, Karras, eosin-nigrosin, and DQ2. Acrosome abnormalities were only detectable with Karras, DIC, and DQ2. In conclusion, prolonging exposure to DQ staining solutions enhanced sensitivity in sperm morphological evaluation, and avoiding rinse as a final step in the DQ protocol improved visualization of certain acrosome defects in dog sperm. Therefore, modified DQ techniques can serve as a viable alternative for dog sperm morphology evaluation in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":93421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical theriogenology","volume":"37 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58292/ct.v16.10243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sperm morphology assessment requires specialized microscopes or stains. Diff-quick (DQ) is considered a universal stain that is cost-effective; however, morphological evaluation of sperm using DQ staining is poor and not encouraging. Therefore, this study investigated modifications to the DQ protocol to improve identification of morphological defects of dog sperm and compared the modified DQ techniques with eosin-nigrosin, Karras, and differential interference contrast microscopy [DIC]). One ejaculate from each of 9 dogs was used. To perform the proposed modified DQ techniques (DQ1 and DQ2), dried semen smears were fixed by immersing for 10 seconds in solution 1 of DQ and 5 minutes each in solutions II and III of the kit. After the third stain solution, slides in DQ1 were rinsed in water whereas slides in DQ2 were not rinsed but were vertically supported to facilitate stain drainage. Results suggested that the standard DQ protocol overestimated normal sperm and detached heads whereas underestimated abnormal heads and total defects compared to DIC, Karras, eosin-nigrosin, and DQ2. Acrosome abnormalities were only detectable with Karras, DIC, and DQ2. In conclusion, prolonging exposure to DQ staining solutions enhanced sensitivity in sperm morphological evaluation, and avoiding rinse as a final step in the DQ protocol improved visualization of certain acrosome defects in dog sperm. Therefore, modified DQ techniques can serve as a viable alternative for dog sperm morphology evaluation in clinical practice.
犬精子形态的改良差速染色法
精子形态评估需要专门的显微镜或染色剂。Diff-quick(DQ)被认为是一种成本效益高的通用染色法;然而,使用DQ染色法对精子进行形态学评估的结果并不乐观。因此,本研究调查了对 DQ 方案的修改,以改进对狗精子形态缺陷的鉴定,并将修改后的 DQ 技术与伊红-曙红、Karras 和微分干涉对比显微镜 [DIC] 进行了比较。)共使用了 9 只狗的各一次射精。为了进行拟议的改良 DQ 技术(DQ1 和 DQ2),将干燥的精液涂片在 DQ 溶液 1 中浸泡 10 秒,然后在试剂盒的溶液 II 和 III 中各浸泡 5 分钟。第三次染色后,DQ1 中的载玻片用水冲洗,而 DQ2 中的载玻片不冲洗,但垂直支撑以利于染色液排出。结果表明,与DIC、Karras、伊红-曙红和DQ2相比,标准DQ方案高估了正常精子和分离的头部,而低估了异常头部和总缺陷。只有 Karras、DIC 和 DQ2 才能检测到顶体异常。总之,延长在 DQ 染色液中的暴露时间可提高精子形态学评估的灵敏度,避免将冲洗作为 DQ 方案的最后一步可提高狗精子顶体缺陷的可视性。因此,在临床实践中,改良DQ技术可作为狗精子形态学评估的可行替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信