Retracted: Polovchenko, Konstantin A. 2022. “The constitutional court as a subject of the political process.” Politics & Policy 50(3): 622–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12469
{"title":"Retracted: Polovchenko, Konstantin A. 2022. “The constitutional court as a subject of the political process.” Politics & Policy 50(3): 622–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12469","authors":"Konstantin A. Polovchenko","doi":"10.1111/polp.12586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The above article published online on 23 May 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the Editor, Emma Norman, and Wiley Periodicals LLC. Following concerns raised by a third party regarding manipulation of the peer review and publishing process, the editor and publisher investigated and found that the peer review process for this paper was compromised. As a result, the conclusions reported in the article are not considered reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"52 1","pages":"250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/polp.12586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The above article published online on 23 May 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the Editor, Emma Norman, and Wiley Periodicals LLC. Following concerns raised by a third party regarding manipulation of the peer review and publishing process, the editor and publisher investigated and found that the peer review process for this paper was compromised. As a result, the conclusions reported in the article are not considered reliable.