Begum Rokeya to Arundhati Roy: An Intangible Dream of Woman Emancipation

Adil Ilahi
{"title":"Begum Rokeya to Arundhati Roy: An Intangible Dream of Woman Emancipation","authors":"Adil Ilahi","doi":"10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both Begum Rokeya's earlier and Arundhati Roy's more recent voices have advocated for women's freedom in essentially the same ways. Although critics have examined how they raise their voices against women’s exploitation, the current situation of women’s suffering when comparing Rokeya and Arundhati’s dreams is not shown. In order to demonstrate a gap in their research, the study compared the conditions of women in Rokeya's literature with the state of current society by discussing Arundhati's works. This essay is written using Begum Rokeya's Sultana's Dream and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things as primary sources. My attempt in this paper is to demonstrate how Begum Rokeya's vision of women's independence is still a dream by referring to relevant scholarly articles and interpreting the works of Arundhati Roy.","PeriodicalId":302537,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social, Political and Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46291/ijospervol11iss1pp17-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both Begum Rokeya's earlier and Arundhati Roy's more recent voices have advocated for women's freedom in essentially the same ways. Although critics have examined how they raise their voices against women’s exploitation, the current situation of women’s suffering when comparing Rokeya and Arundhati’s dreams is not shown. In order to demonstrate a gap in their research, the study compared the conditions of women in Rokeya's literature with the state of current society by discussing Arundhati's works. This essay is written using Begum Rokeya's Sultana's Dream and Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things as primary sources. My attempt in this paper is to demonstrate how Begum Rokeya's vision of women's independence is still a dream by referring to relevant scholarly articles and interpreting the works of Arundhati Roy.
Begum Rokeya 到 Arundhati Roy:妇女解放的无形梦想
无论是 Begum Rokeya 早期的作品,还是 Arundhati Roy 近期的作品,都以基本相同的方式倡导妇女自由。尽管评论家们研究了她们如何发出反对剥削妇女的声音,但在比较罗克亚和阿伦达蒂-罗伊的梦想时,却没有显示出妇女受苦受难的现状。为了证明研究中的空白,本研究通过讨论阿伦达蒂的作品,将 Rokeya 文学作品中的女性状况与当前社会的状况进行了比较。本文以 Begum Rokeya 的《苏丹娜的梦》和 Arundhati Roy 的《小事之神》为主要资料来源。在本文中,我试图通过参考相关学术文章和解读阿伦达蒂-罗伊的作品,来说明贝古姆-罗克亚对妇女独立的憧憬仍然是一个梦想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信