Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Thoracotomy Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Q2 Medicine
Mahbobe Rashidi, K. Mahmoodi, R. Akhondzadeh, Reza Baghbanian, Fatemeh Jahangiri Mehr, Niloofar Safaei Semnani
{"title":"Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine in Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Thoracotomy Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"Mahbobe Rashidi, K. Mahmoodi, R. Akhondzadeh, Reza Baghbanian, Fatemeh Jahangiri Mehr, Niloofar Safaei Semnani","doi":"10.5812/aapm-137664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative pain control after thoracotomy is very important, and if not controlled, it can cause severe complications. Objectives: This study aimed to compare dexmedetomidine and ketamine in serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in pain control after thoracotomy. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 74 patients aged 18 to 60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II who were referred to Imam Khomeini hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, for thoracotomy and randomly divided into two groups. After surgery, the SAPB with ultrasound-guided was performed. In the ropivacaine-ketamine (RK) group, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine solution 0.25% and in the ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine (RD) group, in addition to 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg was added. Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in both groups in terms of demographic information (P < 0.05). The average VNS was lower in the ketamine group than in the dexmedetomidine group; however, there was a significant difference only at 1, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of SBP and DBP, HR, and MAP. There was a significant difference in the RR in the two groups at 12 and 24 hours after the operation (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine and ketamine, which were used as supplements to ropivacaine for SAPB in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy, reduced the pain intensity after thoracotomy; nevertheless, the intensity of pain reduction was more and more effective in the group receiving ketamine.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"79 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-137664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative pain control after thoracotomy is very important, and if not controlled, it can cause severe complications. Objectives: This study aimed to compare dexmedetomidine and ketamine in serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) in pain control after thoracotomy. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 74 patients aged 18 to 60 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II who were referred to Imam Khomeini hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, for thoracotomy and randomly divided into two groups. After surgery, the SAPB with ultrasound-guided was performed. In the ropivacaine-ketamine (RK) group, ketamine 0.5 mg/kg and 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine solution 0.25% and in the ropivacaine-dexmedetomidine (RD) group, in addition to 0.4 cc/kg ropivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg was added. Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in both groups in terms of demographic information (P < 0.05). The average VNS was lower in the ketamine group than in the dexmedetomidine group; however, there was a significant difference only at 1, 12, and 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of SBP and DBP, HR, and MAP. There was a significant difference in the RR in the two groups at 12 and 24 hours after the operation (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine and ketamine, which were used as supplements to ropivacaine for SAPB in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy, reduced the pain intensity after thoracotomy; nevertheless, the intensity of pain reduction was more and more effective in the group receiving ketamine.
比较右美托咪定和氯胺酮在胸骨切开术患者术后疼痛控制中的前庭阻滞作用:随机临床试验
背景:开胸手术后的疼痛控制非常重要,如果不加以控制,会导致严重的并发症。研究目的本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和氯胺酮在前锯肌平面阻滞(SAPB)中对开胸术后疼痛控制的作用。方法这项随机临床试验的对象是74名年龄在18至60岁之间、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级或II级的患者,他们被转诊到伊朗阿瓦士的伊玛目霍梅尼医院接受开胸手术,并被随机分为两组。手术后,在超声引导下进行 SAPB。在罗哌卡因-氯胺酮(RK)组中,氯胺酮的剂量为 0.5 毫克/千克和 0.4 毫升/千克的罗哌卡因溶液(0.25%);在罗哌卡因-右美托咪定(RD)组中,除了 0.4 毫升/千克的罗哌卡因溶液(0.25%)外,还加入了 0.5 微克/千克的右美托咪定。记录口头数字量表(VNS)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、呼吸频率(RR)、心率(HR)和平均动脉血压(MAP)。结果两组在人口统计学信息方面无明显差异(P < 0.05)。氯胺酮组的平均 VNS 值低于右美托咪定组;但只有在术后 1、12 和 24 小时才有显著差异(P < 0.05)。在 SBP 和 DBP、HR 和 MAP 方面,两组之间的差异无统计学意义。两组在术后 12 小时和 24 小时的 RR 有明显差异(P < 0.05)。结论右美托咪定和氯胺酮是罗哌卡因用于择期开胸手术 SAPB 的辅助药物,可减轻开胸手术后的疼痛强度;然而,氯胺酮组的疼痛减轻强度更大,效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信