Evaluating the Usability, Perceived Performance, and Perceived Effects of KBGAN iHealth© and KBGAN iFeed© Mobile Apps for Buffalo Management in Selected Municipalities in the Philippines

E. P. Palacpac, Kae Ann Marie Pacsa Balingit, Airon Andrew Dinulos Bonifacio, Marvin Ardeza Villanueva, Randolph Bautista Tolentino, Mary Rose De Leon Uy-DeGuia, Phoebe Lyndia Tolentino Llantada, Charity Ignacio Castillo, Beverly Janabajal Brul, Hannah Carmela Adecer Rubio, Maica Miclat Abes
{"title":"Evaluating the Usability, Perceived Performance, and Perceived Effects of KBGAN iHealth© and KBGAN iFeed© Mobile Apps for Buffalo Management in Selected Municipalities in the Philippines","authors":"E. P. Palacpac, Kae Ann Marie Pacsa Balingit, Airon Andrew Dinulos Bonifacio, Marvin Ardeza Villanueva, Randolph Bautista Tolentino, Mary Rose De Leon Uy-DeGuia, Phoebe Lyndia Tolentino Llantada, Charity Ignacio Castillo, Beverly Janabajal Brul, Hannah Carmela Adecer Rubio, Maica Miclat Abes","doi":"10.6000/1927-520x.2024.13.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the KBGAN iHealth© and KBGAN iFeed© mobile apps designed for buffalo health and feeding management, particularly for agricultural extension professionals (AEPs) in selected Philippine municipalities. These apps aim to address challenges in buffalo management, such as limited access to veterinary expertise, personalized recommendations, organized data, communication channels, and difficulties in calculating ideal feed compositions and meeting the distinct needs of smallholder farmers and AEPs. Despite System Usability Scale (SUS) scores indicating marginal acceptability for both apps, weighted mean scores by AEPs for statements assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 as strongly disagree and 5 as strongly agree), demonstrate that AEPs reported high confidence in the accuracy of buffalo health diagnostics (Mean of 4.20) and health management recommendations (Mean of 4.17) provided by KBGAN iHealth©. Similarly, KBGAN iFeed© received favorable ratings, with AEPs expressing agreement on the accuracy of feeding recommendations (Mean of 3.89) and the facilitation of feeding ration computations (Mean of 4.00). These positive perceived performance outcomes, coupled with increased confidence (Mean of 4.03) and motivation (Mean of 4.00) among AEPs, suggest the potential for frequent and consistent app usage despite usability concerns. Chi-square tests examining the relationship between AEP characteristics and SUS scores for the apps reveal significant associations between AEPs' education and experience levels and SUS scores for KBGAN iFeed©. The choice of IT device also influences KBGAN iHealth© SUS scores. Proposed enhancements by AEPs include refining algorithms, improving the user interface for navigation, speed, and efficiency, and incorporating features such as photo uploads and geotagging.","PeriodicalId":503657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Buffalo Science","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Buffalo Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520x.2024.13.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the KBGAN iHealth© and KBGAN iFeed© mobile apps designed for buffalo health and feeding management, particularly for agricultural extension professionals (AEPs) in selected Philippine municipalities. These apps aim to address challenges in buffalo management, such as limited access to veterinary expertise, personalized recommendations, organized data, communication channels, and difficulties in calculating ideal feed compositions and meeting the distinct needs of smallholder farmers and AEPs. Despite System Usability Scale (SUS) scores indicating marginal acceptability for both apps, weighted mean scores by AEPs for statements assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (1 as strongly disagree and 5 as strongly agree), demonstrate that AEPs reported high confidence in the accuracy of buffalo health diagnostics (Mean of 4.20) and health management recommendations (Mean of 4.17) provided by KBGAN iHealth©. Similarly, KBGAN iFeed© received favorable ratings, with AEPs expressing agreement on the accuracy of feeding recommendations (Mean of 3.89) and the facilitation of feeding ration computations (Mean of 4.00). These positive perceived performance outcomes, coupled with increased confidence (Mean of 4.03) and motivation (Mean of 4.00) among AEPs, suggest the potential for frequent and consistent app usage despite usability concerns. Chi-square tests examining the relationship between AEP characteristics and SUS scores for the apps reveal significant associations between AEPs' education and experience levels and SUS scores for KBGAN iFeed©. The choice of IT device also influences KBGAN iHealth© SUS scores. Proposed enhancements by AEPs include refining algorithms, improving the user interface for navigation, speed, and efficiency, and incorporating features such as photo uploads and geotagging.
评估 KBGAN iHealth© 和 KBGAN iFeed© 移动应用程序在菲律宾部分城市水牛管理中的可用性、感知性能和感知效果
本研究对KBGAN iHealth©和KBGAN iFeed©移动应用程序进行了评估,这两个应用程序专为水牛健康和饲养管理而设计,特别是针对菲律宾部分城市的农业推广专业人员(AEPs)。这些应用程序旨在应对水牛管理方面的挑战,如有限的兽医专业知识、个性化建议、有组织的数据、沟通渠道、计算理想饲料成分的困难以及满足小农和农业推广专业人员的独特需求。尽管系统可用性量表(SUS)的得分表明这两款应用程序的可接受性都不高,但AEPs对以5分李克特量表(1分为非常不同意,5分为非常同意)评估的陈述的加权平均得分表明,AEPs对KBGAN iHealth©提供的水牛健康诊断(平均值为4.20)和健康管理建议(平均值为4.17)的准确性很有信心。同样,KBGAN iFeed©也获得了好评,AEPs对饲喂建议的准确性(平均值为3.89)和饲喂量计算的便利性(平均值为4.00)表示认同。这些积极的感知性能结果,加上AEPs信心的增强(平均值为4.03)和积极性的提高(平均值为4.00),表明尽管存在可用性方面的问题,但AEPs仍有可能经常持续使用该应用程序。对美国教育工作者特征与应用程序 SUS 分数之间关系的卡方检验显示,美国教育工作者的教育程度和经验水平与 KBGAN iFeed© 的 SUS 分数之间存在显著关联。信息技术设备的选择也会影响 KBGAN iHealth© 的 SUS 分数。AEPs提出的改进建议包括完善算法,改进用户界面的导航、速度和效率,以及加入照片上传和地理标记等功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信