Certificates of confidentiality: privileging research data

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Leslie E Wolf, Natalie Ram, Jorge Contreras, Laura M Beskow
{"title":"Certificates of confidentiality: privileging research data","authors":"Leslie E Wolf, Natalie Ram, Jorge Contreras, Laura M Beskow","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract With the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, reproductive research now joins other sensitive research topics that present legal risks to research participants, underscoring the role of Certificates in protecting them. Yet, stakeholders question whether Certificates will hold up in court. In this article, we describe the essential arguments supporting Congress’s regulation of biomedical research and, thus, Certificates, under its authority to regulate interstate commerce. Our analysis should reassure researchers and Institutional review boards who rely on Certificates to protect the confidentiality of research participants’ data. We conclude with recommendations for stakeholders based on our analysis.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract With the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs, reproductive research now joins other sensitive research topics that present legal risks to research participants, underscoring the role of Certificates in protecting them. Yet, stakeholders question whether Certificates will hold up in court. In this article, we describe the essential arguments supporting Congress’s regulation of biomedical research and, thus, Certificates, under its authority to regulate interstate commerce. Our analysis should reassure researchers and Institutional review boards who rely on Certificates to protect the confidentiality of research participants’ data. We conclude with recommendations for stakeholders based on our analysis.
保密证书:研究数据的特权
摘要 随着最高法院对 Dobbs 案的判决,生殖研究现在与其他敏感的研究课题一样,给研究参与者带来了法律风险,凸显了证书在保护参与者方面的作用。然而,利益相关者质疑证书在法庭上是否站得住脚。在本文中,我们将阐述支持国会根据其监管州际商业的权力对生物医学研究进行监管,从而对证书进行监管的基本论点。我们的分析应该能让研究人员和机构审查委员会放心,因为他们依赖证书来保护研究参与者数据的机密性。最后,我们将根据分析结果向利益相关者提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信