Safety and Efficacy of Semaglutide Use in Diabetes during Ramadan Fasting: A Real-world Experience from Bangladesh

M. Pathan, Nazma Akter, S. Selim, Md Feroz Amin, F. Afsana, M. Saifuddin, A. Kamrul-Hasan, M. Mustari, Ashish Kumar Chakraborty, Riad M. M. Hossain
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Semaglutide Use in Diabetes during Ramadan Fasting: A Real-world Experience from Bangladesh","authors":"M. Pathan, Nazma Akter, S. Selim, Md Feroz Amin, F. Afsana, M. Saifuddin, A. Kamrul-Hasan, M. Mustari, Ashish Kumar Chakraborty, Riad M. M. Hossain","doi":"10.4103/bjem.bjem_29_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The study has been conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide during Ramadan fasting among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Bangladesh who intended to fast during Ramadan 2022.\n \n \n \n This was an open-label, single-center, two-arm parallel-group study. In this prospective observational study, patients were enrolled in two groups depending on treated with or without semaglutide for at least 3 months prior Ramadan. Initially, total 200 patients were enrolled at the first visit (4 weeks before Ramadan); among them, 58 subjects were in the semaglutide group (Group A) and 142 in other than the semaglutide group (Group B). At the end of the second visit (within 4 weeks after Ramadan) after data editing and cleaning, a total of 130 patients (55 subjects in Group A and 75 subjects in Group B) were included in the final statistical analysis. All of them were followed up for a total of 24 weeks including 12 weeks of screening period. The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%), weight loss (kg), hypoglycemia (number of events), and episodes of gastrointestinal (GI) upset (number of events) during Ramadan fasting.\n \n \n \n Patients in the semaglutide group had better glycemic control after fasting of Ramadan compared to the control group (mean decrease in HbA1c level: 0.61% vs. 0.19%; P < 0.001). In addition, more than 18% of the patients in the semaglutide group achieved good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%), while the rate was 13.3% in the control group. Patients treated with semaglutide achieved a better weight loss than the nonsemaglutide group (2.97 vs. 1.38 kg; P < 0.001). Although there was no significant difference in terms of hypoglycemic events in both the groups (P = 0.13), but the GI symptoms were more common in the semaglutide group than the control group (P < 0.05). Among other secondary endpoints, the serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride were significantly decreased in the semaglutide group compared to the control group (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n Semaglutide showed better efficacy in glycemic control, weight loss, and dyslipidemia compared to other hypoglycemic drugs in patients with T2DM during Ramadan. Although patients receiving semaglutide reported fewer hypoglycemic episodes and GI upset events, they might be subjected to other medications or prolonged fasting. Semaglutide might be considered a suitable therapy during Ramadan fasting based on judicial judgment.\n","PeriodicalId":479958,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"38 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bjem.bjem_29_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The study has been conducted to observe the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide during Ramadan fasting among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Bangladesh who intended to fast during Ramadan 2022. This was an open-label, single-center, two-arm parallel-group study. In this prospective observational study, patients were enrolled in two groups depending on treated with or without semaglutide for at least 3 months prior Ramadan. Initially, total 200 patients were enrolled at the first visit (4 weeks before Ramadan); among them, 58 subjects were in the semaglutide group (Group A) and 142 in other than the semaglutide group (Group B). At the end of the second visit (within 4 weeks after Ramadan) after data editing and cleaning, a total of 130 patients (55 subjects in Group A and 75 subjects in Group B) were included in the final statistical analysis. All of them were followed up for a total of 24 weeks including 12 weeks of screening period. The primary objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (%), weight loss (kg), hypoglycemia (number of events), and episodes of gastrointestinal (GI) upset (number of events) during Ramadan fasting. Patients in the semaglutide group had better glycemic control after fasting of Ramadan compared to the control group (mean decrease in HbA1c level: 0.61% vs. 0.19%; P < 0.001). In addition, more than 18% of the patients in the semaglutide group achieved good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%), while the rate was 13.3% in the control group. Patients treated with semaglutide achieved a better weight loss than the nonsemaglutide group (2.97 vs. 1.38 kg; P < 0.001). Although there was no significant difference in terms of hypoglycemic events in both the groups (P = 0.13), but the GI symptoms were more common in the semaglutide group than the control group (P < 0.05). Among other secondary endpoints, the serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride were significantly decreased in the semaglutide group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Semaglutide showed better efficacy in glycemic control, weight loss, and dyslipidemia compared to other hypoglycemic drugs in patients with T2DM during Ramadan. Although patients receiving semaglutide reported fewer hypoglycemic episodes and GI upset events, they might be subjected to other medications or prolonged fasting. Semaglutide might be considered a suitable therapy during Ramadan fasting based on judicial judgment.
斋月禁食期间使用塞马鲁肽治疗糖尿病的安全性和有效性:孟加拉国的真实体验
摘要 本研究旨在观察在 2022 年斋月期间禁食的孟加拉国 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,每周一次皮下注射塞马鲁肽的疗效和安全性。 这是一项开放标签、单中心、双臂平行组研究。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,根据患者在斋月前至少 3 个月是否接受过塞马鲁肽治疗,将他们分为两组。在首次访问(斋月前 4 周)时,共招募了 200 名患者;其中,58 人被分到了semaglutide 组(A 组),142 人被分到了semaglutide 组以外的其他组(B 组)。在第二次访问(斋月后 4 周内)结束时,经过数据编辑和清理,共有 130 名患者(A 组 55 人,B 组 75 人)被纳入最终统计分析。所有患者均接受了为期 24 周的随访,其中包括 12 周的筛查期。研究的主要目的是评估斋月禁食期间塞马鲁肽在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(%)、体重下降(公斤)、低血糖(次数)和胃肠道不适(次数)方面的疗效和安全性。 与对照组相比,赛马鲁肽组患者在斋月禁食后的血糖控制更好(HbA1c水平平均下降0.61%对0.19%;P < 0.001)。此外,超过 18% 的semaglutide 组患者实现了良好的血糖控制(HbA1c <7%),而对照组的这一比例仅为 13.3%。接受塞马鲁肽治疗的患者的体重减轻效果优于未接受塞马鲁肽治疗的患者(2.97 千克对 1.38 千克;P < 0.001)。虽然两组在低血糖事件方面没有明显差异(P = 0.13),但塞马鲁肽组的消化道症状比对照组更常见(P < 0.05)。在其他次要终点中,与对照组相比,塞马鲁肽组的血清总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白和甘油三酯水平显著下降(P < 0.05)。 在斋月期间,与其他降糖药物相比,塞马鲁肽对 T2DM 患者的血糖控制、体重减轻和血脂异常具有更好的疗效。虽然接受塞马鲁肽治疗的患者报告的低血糖发作和消化道不适事件较少,但他们可能会受到其他药物或长时间禁食的影响。根据司法判断,塞马鲁肽可能被认为是斋月禁食期间的一种合适疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信