{"title":"Vitamin D fortification of foods – sensory, acceptability, cost, and public acceptance considerations","authors":"Kevin D. Cashman","doi":"10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In terms of vitamin D food fortification, there are a number of important considerations in relation to selection of the food vehicle and fortificant. While there has been much research focus on the ability of fortified foods to improve vitamin D status, other considerations, such as sensory properties and acceptability, cost, and public attitudes around vitamin D-fortified foods, have received less attention. Thus, the present narrative review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge around these important considerations. In summary, its findings suggest that: i) vitamin D addition to various food vehicles, at levels consistent with the supply of part or all the recommended intake, does not alter their sensory characteristics or overall acceptability; ii) overall, vitamin D fortification of foods is relatively cost-effective, despite the fact that some attitudinal studies highlighted participant concerns about the potential cost/expense of vitamin D-fortified foods; iii) evidence from various attitudinal studies suggest a high level of acceptance and/or purchase intention (i.e., extent to which customers are willing and inclined to buy) of vitamin D-fortified food products by the general public; and iv) there have been repeated calls for vitamin D public health educational/information campaigns to help educate consumers about the health risks associated with vitamin D deficiency and nutritional benefits associated with consumption of vitamin D-fortified foods. Such campaigns could positively mediate attitudes and acceptance of vitamin D-fortified foods amongst the public, and could also help address misconceptions and allay fears around vitamin D for concerned individuals. Lastly, the findings of the present review also highlight the existence of between-country differences, even within Europe, in relation to attitudes and purchase intention of vitamin D-fortified foods and the perceived appropriateness of certain food vehicles for vitamin D fortification, as well as the best mix of communication channels for a vitamin D public health educational/information campaign.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960076024000426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In terms of vitamin D food fortification, there are a number of important considerations in relation to selection of the food vehicle and fortificant. While there has been much research focus on the ability of fortified foods to improve vitamin D status, other considerations, such as sensory properties and acceptability, cost, and public attitudes around vitamin D-fortified foods, have received less attention. Thus, the present narrative review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge around these important considerations. In summary, its findings suggest that: i) vitamin D addition to various food vehicles, at levels consistent with the supply of part or all the recommended intake, does not alter their sensory characteristics or overall acceptability; ii) overall, vitamin D fortification of foods is relatively cost-effective, despite the fact that some attitudinal studies highlighted participant concerns about the potential cost/expense of vitamin D-fortified foods; iii) evidence from various attitudinal studies suggest a high level of acceptance and/or purchase intention (i.e., extent to which customers are willing and inclined to buy) of vitamin D-fortified food products by the general public; and iv) there have been repeated calls for vitamin D public health educational/information campaigns to help educate consumers about the health risks associated with vitamin D deficiency and nutritional benefits associated with consumption of vitamin D-fortified foods. Such campaigns could positively mediate attitudes and acceptance of vitamin D-fortified foods amongst the public, and could also help address misconceptions and allay fears around vitamin D for concerned individuals. Lastly, the findings of the present review also highlight the existence of between-country differences, even within Europe, in relation to attitudes and purchase intention of vitamin D-fortified foods and the perceived appropriateness of certain food vehicles for vitamin D fortification, as well as the best mix of communication channels for a vitamin D public health educational/information campaign.
就维生素 D 食品强化而言,在选择食品载体和强化剂方面有许多重要的考虑因素。尽管许多研究都关注强化食品改善维生素 D 状态的能力,但其他考虑因素,如感官特性和可接受性、成本以及公众对维生素 D 强化食品的态度,却较少受到关注。因此,本综述旨在总结有关这些重要考虑因素的现有知识。综上所述,其研究结果表明:i) 在各种食品中添加维生素 D(添加量与部分或全部推荐摄入量相一致)不会改变其感官特性或总体可接受性;ii) 尽管一些态度研究强调了参与者对维生素 D 强化食品潜在成本/费用的担忧,但总体而言,食品中添加维生素 D 的成本效益相对较高;iii) 来自各种态度研究的证据表明,人们对维生素 D 强化食品的接受程度和/或购买意向(即:顾客愿意和倾向于购买维生素 D 强化食品的程度)较高、iv) 人们一再呼吁开展维生素 D 公共卫生教育/宣传活动,帮助消费者了解维生素 D 缺乏对健康的危害以及食用维生素 D 强化食品对营养的益处。这种宣传活动可以积极调解公众对维生素 D强化食品的态度和接受程度,还有助于消除误解,减轻相关人员对维生素 D 的恐惧。最后,本综述的研究结果还突显出,即使是在欧洲,不同国家对维生素 D 强化食品的态度和购买意向也存在差异,人们认为某些食品是否适合作为维生素 D 强化的载体,以及维生素 D 公共健康教育/宣传活动的最佳传播渠道组合也存在差异。