Barriers to accessing post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil: The impact of COVID-19

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Cássia R.T. Juliato, Montas Laporte, Fernanda Surita, Luis Bahamondes
{"title":"Barriers to accessing post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil: The impact of COVID-19","authors":"Cássia R.T. Juliato,&nbsp;Montas Laporte,&nbsp;Fernanda Surita,&nbsp;Luis Bahamondes","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of our article is to discuss barriers associated with post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Socioeconomic differences in gaining access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods became greater during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inadequate distribution of existing resources and the reduced capacity for elective care meant that healthcare providers in family planning had to be reallocated to respond to COVID-19 emergencies. In Brazil, 74% of the population depends on the national health service (<em>Sistema Unico de Saúde</em>) including for the provision of free contraception. However, the only LARC method available at the public service is the copper-intrauterine device (IUD); implants and hormonal-IUDs are not available, except at some teaching hospitals. Contraceptive sales remained unmodified during the pandemic, which shows that the majority of the population used less effective or no contraceptive methods during this time. However, sales of implants and the hormonal-IUD increased significantly, indicating the inequity of the low-income portion of the society as only the wealthy can afford these. On the other hand, there was an increase in sales of emergency contraception. The uptake of postpartum IUDs and contraceptive implants at the selected teaching hospitals in which they were available was high during the COVID-19 pandemic as they were the only methods immediately available. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic increased both inequality and social differences in gaining access to contraceptives. Postpartum and immediate post abortion methods were also good strategies during the pandemic and were well accepted by the population. However, they were not offered by most services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693424000282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our article is to discuss barriers associated with post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Socioeconomic differences in gaining access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods became greater during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inadequate distribution of existing resources and the reduced capacity for elective care meant that healthcare providers in family planning had to be reallocated to respond to COVID-19 emergencies. In Brazil, 74% of the population depends on the national health service (Sistema Unico de Saúde) including for the provision of free contraception. However, the only LARC method available at the public service is the copper-intrauterine device (IUD); implants and hormonal-IUDs are not available, except at some teaching hospitals. Contraceptive sales remained unmodified during the pandemic, which shows that the majority of the population used less effective or no contraceptive methods during this time. However, sales of implants and the hormonal-IUD increased significantly, indicating the inequity of the low-income portion of the society as only the wealthy can afford these. On the other hand, there was an increase in sales of emergency contraception. The uptake of postpartum IUDs and contraceptive implants at the selected teaching hospitals in which they were available was high during the COVID-19 pandemic as they were the only methods immediately available. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic increased both inequality and social differences in gaining access to contraceptives. Postpartum and immediate post abortion methods were also good strategies during the pandemic and were well accepted by the population. However, they were not offered by most services.

巴西孕后避孕的障碍:COVID-19 的影响
我们这篇文章的目的是讨论在 SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)大流行期间巴西与孕后避孕相关的障碍。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,获得长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法方面的社会经济差异变得更大。现有资源分配不足以及选择性护理能力下降意味着计划生育医疗服务提供者必须重新分配资源,以应对 COVID-19 的紧急情况。在巴西,74% 的人口依靠国家卫生服务系统(Sistema Unico de Saúde)提供免费避孕药具。然而,公共服务机构提供的唯一 LARC 方法是铜质宫内节育器(IUD);除一些教学医院外,不提供皮下埋植剂和荷尔蒙宫内节育器。在大流行期间,避孕药具的销售量没有任何变化,这表明大多数人在此期间使用了效果较差的避孕方法或没有使用任何避孕方法。然而,皮下埋植剂和荷尔蒙宫内节育器的销售量却大幅增加,这表明社会中低收入阶层的不公平,因为只有富人才能负担得起这些费用。另一方面,紧急避孕药具的销售量有所增加。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,产后宫内节育器和避孕皮下埋植剂在选定的教学医院的使用率很高,因为这是唯一可立即使用的方法。总之,COVID-19 大流行加剧了在获得避孕药具方面的不平等和社会差异。在大流行期间,产后避孕法和流产后立即避孕法也是很好的策略,并被人们广泛接受。然而,大多数服务机构都没有提供这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信