Design and In Vitro Validation of an Orthopaedic Drill Guide for Femoral Stem Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jan-Willem Klok;Jessica Groenewegen;Olivier Temmerman;Niels Van Straten;Bart Van Straten;Jenny Dankelman;Tim Horeman
{"title":"Design and In Vitro Validation of an Orthopaedic Drill Guide for Femoral Stem Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty","authors":"Jan-Willem Klok;Jessica Groenewegen;Olivier Temmerman;Niels Van Straten;Bart Van Straten;Jenny Dankelman;Tim Horeman","doi":"10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3365300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrates superior survival rates compared to uncemented procedures. Nevertheless, most younger patients opt for uncemented THA, as removing well-fixed bone cement in the femur during revisions is complex, particularly the distal cement plug. This removal procedure often increases the risk of femoral fracture or perforation, haemorrhage and weakening bone due to poor drill control and positioning. Aim of this study was to design a novel drill guide to improve drill positioning. Methods and procedures: A novel orthopaedic drill guide was developed, featuring a compliant centralizer activated by a drill guide actuator. Bone models were prepared to assess centralizing performance. Three conditions were tested: drilling without guidance, guided drilling with centralizer activation held, and guided drilling with centralizer activation released. Deviations from the bone centre were measured at the entry and exit point of the drill. Results: In the centralizing performance test, the drill guide significantly reduced drill hole deviations in both entry and exit points compared to the control (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$p &lt; 0.05$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n). The absolute deviation on the exit side of the cement plug was 10.59mm (SD 1.56) for the ‘No drill guide‘ condition, 3.02mm (SD 2.09) for ‘Drill guide – hold‘ and 2.12mm (SD 1.71) for ‘Drill guide – release‘. The compliant drill guide centralizer significantly lowered the risk of cortical bone perforation during intramedullary canal drilling in the bone models due to better control of the cement drill position. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement: The drill guide potentially reduces perioperative risks in cemented femoral stem revision. Future research should identify optimal scenarios for its application.","PeriodicalId":54255,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","volume":"12 ","pages":"340-347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10433182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-Jtehm","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10433182/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) demonstrates superior survival rates compared to uncemented procedures. Nevertheless, most younger patients opt for uncemented THA, as removing well-fixed bone cement in the femur during revisions is complex, particularly the distal cement plug. This removal procedure often increases the risk of femoral fracture or perforation, haemorrhage and weakening bone due to poor drill control and positioning. Aim of this study was to design a novel drill guide to improve drill positioning. Methods and procedures: A novel orthopaedic drill guide was developed, featuring a compliant centralizer activated by a drill guide actuator. Bone models were prepared to assess centralizing performance. Three conditions were tested: drilling without guidance, guided drilling with centralizer activation held, and guided drilling with centralizer activation released. Deviations from the bone centre were measured at the entry and exit point of the drill. Results: In the centralizing performance test, the drill guide significantly reduced drill hole deviations in both entry and exit points compared to the control ( $p < 0.05$ ). The absolute deviation on the exit side of the cement plug was 10.59mm (SD 1.56) for the ‘No drill guide‘ condition, 3.02mm (SD 2.09) for ‘Drill guide – hold‘ and 2.12mm (SD 1.71) for ‘Drill guide – release‘. The compliant drill guide centralizer significantly lowered the risk of cortical bone perforation during intramedullary canal drilling in the bone models due to better control of the cement drill position. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement: The drill guide potentially reduces perioperative risks in cemented femoral stem revision. Future research should identify optimal scenarios for its application.
用于全髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修的矫形钻导向器的设计与体外验证
目的:与非骨水泥全髋关节置换术(THA)相比,骨水泥全髋关节置换术的存活率更高。尽管如此,大多数年轻患者仍选择非骨水泥全髋关节置换术,因为在翻修过程中清除股骨中固定良好的骨水泥非常复杂,尤其是远端骨水泥塞。由于钻孔控制和定位不佳,清除过程往往会增加股骨骨折或穿孔、大出血和骨质减弱的风险。本研究旨在设计一种新型钻头导向器,以改善钻头定位。方法和程序:开发了一种新型骨科钻导向器,其特点是由钻导向器致动器激活的顺应性集中器。制备了骨骼模型以评估集中性能。测试了三种情况:无引导钻孔、保持中心器激活状态的引导钻孔和释放中心器激活状态的引导钻孔。在钻头的进入点和退出点测量了与骨中心的偏差。结果显示在集中性能测试中,与对照组相比,钻头导向器显著减少了钻孔入口和出口的偏差(p < 0.05$)。无钻杆导向器 "条件下,水泥塞出口侧的绝对偏差为 10.59 毫米(标准差 1.56),"钻杆导向器-保持 "条件下为 3.02 毫米(标准差 2.09),"钻杆导向器-释放 "条件下为 2.12 毫米(标准差 1.71)。由于更好地控制了骨水泥钻的位置,顺应性钻导集中器大大降低了骨模型髓内管钻孔过程中皮质骨穿孔的风险。临床和转化影响声明:钻导器可降低骨水泥股骨干翻修的围手术期风险。未来的研究应确定其应用的最佳方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine is an open access product that bridges the engineering and clinical worlds, focusing on detailed descriptions of advanced technical solutions to a clinical need along with clinical results and healthcare relevance. The journal provides a platform for state-of-the-art technology directions in the interdisciplinary field of biomedical engineering, embracing engineering, life sciences and medicine. A unique aspect of the journal is its ability to foster a collaboration between physicians and engineers for presenting broad and compelling real world technological and engineering solutions that can be implemented in the interest of improving quality of patient care and treatment outcomes, thereby reducing costs and improving efficiency. The journal provides an active forum for clinical research and relevant state-of the-art technology for members of all the IEEE societies that have an interest in biomedical engineering as well as reaching out directly to physicians and the medical community through the American Medical Association (AMA) and other clinical societies. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited, to topics on: Medical devices, healthcare delivery systems, global healthcare initiatives, and ICT based services; Technological relevance to healthcare cost reduction; Technology affecting healthcare management, decision-making, and policy; Advanced technical work that is applied to solving specific clinical needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信