Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model Construction for the 2023 U.S. 50‐State National Seismic Hazard Model Update: Central and Eastern U.S. Fault‐Based Source Model

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Allison M. Shumway, Mark D. Petersen, Peter M. Powers, Gabriel Toro, Jason M. Altekruse, Julie A. Herrick, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Alexandra E. Hatem, Demi L. Girot
{"title":"Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model Construction for the 2023 U.S. 50‐State National Seismic Hazard Model Update: Central and Eastern U.S. Fault‐Based Source Model","authors":"Allison M. Shumway, Mark D. Petersen, Peter M. Powers, Gabriel Toro, Jason M. Altekruse, Julie A. Herrick, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Jessica A. Thompson Jobe, Alexandra E. Hatem, Demi L. Girot","doi":"10.1785/0220230294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s 2023 50‐State National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM), we make modest revisions and additions to the central and eastern U.S. (CEUS) fault‐based seismic source model that result in locally substantial hazard changes. The CEUS fault‐based source model was last updated as part of the 2014 NSHM and considered new information from the Seismic Source Characterization for Nuclear Facilities (CEUS‐SSCn) Project. Since then, new geologic investigations have led to revised fault and fault‐zone inputs, and the release of databases of fault‐based sources in the CEUS. We have reviewed these databases and made minor revisions to six of the current fault‐based sources in the NSHM, as well as added five new fault‐based sources. Implementation of these sources follows the current NSHM methodology for CEUS fault‐based sources, as well as the incorporation of a new magnitude–area relationship and updated maximum magnitude and recurrence rate estimates following the methods used by the CEUS‐SSCn Project. Seismic hazard sensitivity calculations show some substantial local changes in hazard (−0.4g to 1.1g) due to some of these revisions and additions, especially from the addition of the central Virginia, Joiner ridge, and Saline River sources and revisions made to the Meers and New Madrid sources.","PeriodicalId":21687,"journal":{"name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismological Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0220230294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s 2023 50‐State National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM), we make modest revisions and additions to the central and eastern U.S. (CEUS) fault‐based seismic source model that result in locally substantial hazard changes. The CEUS fault‐based source model was last updated as part of the 2014 NSHM and considered new information from the Seismic Source Characterization for Nuclear Facilities (CEUS‐SSCn) Project. Since then, new geologic investigations have led to revised fault and fault‐zone inputs, and the release of databases of fault‐based sources in the CEUS. We have reviewed these databases and made minor revisions to six of the current fault‐based sources in the NSHM, as well as added five new fault‐based sources. Implementation of these sources follows the current NSHM methodology for CEUS fault‐based sources, as well as the incorporation of a new magnitude–area relationship and updated maximum magnitude and recurrence rate estimates following the methods used by the CEUS‐SSCn Project. Seismic hazard sensitivity calculations show some substantial local changes in hazard (−0.4g to 1.1g) due to some of these revisions and additions, especially from the addition of the central Virginia, Joiner ridge, and Saline River sources and revisions made to the Meers and New Madrid sources.
为 2023 年美国 50 州国家地震危害模型更新构建地震破裂预测模型:美国中部和东部基于断层的震源模型
作为美国地质调查局 2023 年 50 个州国家地震危险性模型(NSHM)的一部分,我们对美国中部和东部(CEUS)基于断层的震源模型进行了适度的修订和补充,这些修订和补充导致了局部的重大危险性变化。CEUS 基于断层的震源模型的上一次更新是作为 2014 年 NSHM 的一部分,并考虑了 "核设施震源特征描述(CEUS-SSCn)项目 "的新信息。从那时起,新的地质调查导致对断层和断层带输入进行了修订,并发布了中欧和东欧大陆断层震源数据库。我们对这些数据库进行了审查,并对目前国家高分辨率辐射计中的六个断层源进行了小幅修订,同时增加了五个新的断层源。这些震源的实施遵循了目前国家高震监测局对中欧和东欧大陆架断层震源所采用的方法,并根据中欧和东欧大陆架-小震源项目所采用的方法,纳入了新的震级-面积关系以及更新的最大震级和重现率估算。地震危害敏感性计算显示,由于其中一些修订和补充,特别是弗吉尼亚州中部、乔伊纳山脊和萨林河震源的增加,以及对米尔斯和新马德里震源的修订,局部地区的危害发生了一些重大变化(-0.4g 至 1.1g)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismological Research Letters
Seismological Research Letters 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信