{"title":"EXPRESS: The Long March: The Quest for Valid Text-Based Indicators of Exploration and Exploitation","authors":"Nazlihan Ugur, Rene Belderbos, Stijn Kelchtermans, Bart Leten","doi":"10.1177/14761270241231724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since March (1991) outlined the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, the exploration-exploitation paradigm has received substantial attention in the management literature. Recent studies have used computer-aided text analysis (CATA) to construct measures of firms’ inclination towards exploration or exploitation, using the original set of keywords proposed by March. We propose a structured series of tests to assess the validity of CATA-based measures and demonstrate that the approach used in prior studies is unlikely to deliver valid indicators. We show that an alternative approach, which relies on a larger library of keywords including synonyms of the March keywords and selects only those keywords that are informative and that pass validity tests, delivers valid CATA indicators – both for unstructured (news articles) and structured text bases (annual reports). Our study contributes to the literature on construct validity and has broader implications for the development of CATA-based indicators in strategy and organization research.Keywords: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, content analysis, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), firm performance","PeriodicalId":22087,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Organization","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270241231724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Since March (1991) outlined the importance of balancing exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, the exploration-exploitation paradigm has received substantial attention in the management literature. Recent studies have used computer-aided text analysis (CATA) to construct measures of firms’ inclination towards exploration or exploitation, using the original set of keywords proposed by March. We propose a structured series of tests to assess the validity of CATA-based measures and demonstrate that the approach used in prior studies is unlikely to deliver valid indicators. We show that an alternative approach, which relies on a larger library of keywords including synonyms of the March keywords and selects only those keywords that are informative and that pass validity tests, delivers valid CATA indicators – both for unstructured (news articles) and structured text bases (annual reports). Our study contributes to the literature on construct validity and has broader implications for the development of CATA-based indicators in strategy and organization research.Keywords: exploration, exploitation, ambidexterity, content analysis, computer-aided text analysis (CATA), firm performance
期刊介绍:
Strategic Organization is devoted to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed, discipline-grounded conceptual and empirical research of interest to researchers, teachers, students, and practitioners of strategic management and organization. The journal also aims to be of considerable interest to senior managers in government, industry, and particularly the growing management consulting industry. Strategic Organization provides an international, interdisciplinary forum designed to improve our understanding of the interrelated dynamics of strategic and organizational processes and outcomes.