The flipped classroom: first-time student preparatory activity patterns and their relation to course performance and self-regulation

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yoana Omarchevska, Anouschka van Leeuwen, Tim Mainhard
{"title":"The flipped classroom: first-time student preparatory activity patterns and their relation to course performance and self-regulation","authors":"Yoana Omarchevska, Anouschka van Leeuwen, Tim Mainhard","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09399-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the flipped classroom, students engage in preparatory activities to study the course materials prior to attending teacher-guided sessions. Students’ success in the flipped classroom is directly related to their preparation and students tend to change their preparation activity over time. Few studies have investigated why students change their preparation activity. Therefore, we address this gap by first clustering university students (<i>N</i> = 174) enrolled in a flipped course for the first time based on their preparatory activities at three time points. We identified distinct preparatory activity patterns by computing changes in cluster membership. Next, we compared students’ preparatory activity patterns in course performance, motivation, and self-regulation. The temporal investigation of activity patterns provided important insights into how preparation (or lack thereof) at different phases relates to course performance. Intensive preparation only at the beginning of the course was related to significantly worse course performance whereas preparation only in the middle of the course was related to higher course performance. Students who performed intensively during the course had significantly higher course performance, higher intrinsic motivation at the beginning, and higher self-regulation (in particular, time management) in the middle of the course than students showing lower activity during preparation. Our findings provide important implications for future research and educational practice, particularly for students transitioning to flipped classroom learning for the first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09399-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the flipped classroom, students engage in preparatory activities to study the course materials prior to attending teacher-guided sessions. Students’ success in the flipped classroom is directly related to their preparation and students tend to change their preparation activity over time. Few studies have investigated why students change their preparation activity. Therefore, we address this gap by first clustering university students (N = 174) enrolled in a flipped course for the first time based on their preparatory activities at three time points. We identified distinct preparatory activity patterns by computing changes in cluster membership. Next, we compared students’ preparatory activity patterns in course performance, motivation, and self-regulation. The temporal investigation of activity patterns provided important insights into how preparation (or lack thereof) at different phases relates to course performance. Intensive preparation only at the beginning of the course was related to significantly worse course performance whereas preparation only in the middle of the course was related to higher course performance. Students who performed intensively during the course had significantly higher course performance, higher intrinsic motivation at the beginning, and higher self-regulation (in particular, time management) in the middle of the course than students showing lower activity during preparation. Our findings provide important implications for future research and educational practice, particularly for students transitioning to flipped classroom learning for the first time.

Abstract Image

翻转课堂:新生的预习活动模式及其与课程成绩和自我调节的关系
在翻转课堂中,学生在参加教师指导的课程之前,会参与预习活动,学习课程材料。学生在翻转课堂中的成功与否与他们的准备活动直接相关,而学生往往会随着时间的推移改变他们的准备活动。很少有研究调查了学生改变准备活动的原因。因此,为了弥补这一空白,我们首先根据首次参加翻转课程的大学生(人数=174)在三个时间点的准备活动对他们进行了分组。通过计算聚类成员的变化,我们确定了不同的准备活动模式。接下来,我们比较了学生在课程成绩、学习动机和自我调节方面的准备活动模式。对活动模式的时间调查为了解不同阶段的准备(或缺乏准备)与课程成绩之间的关系提供了重要启示。仅在课程开始时进行强化准备与明显较差的课程成绩有关,而仅在课程中间进行准备则与较高的课程成绩有关。与在备课期间活动较少的学生相比,在课程开始阶段进行密集备课的学生的课程成绩明显更高,内在动机更高,在课程中期的自我调节能力(尤其是时间管理能力)更强。我们的研究结果为未来的研究和教育实践提供了重要的启示,尤其是对于首次过渡到翻转课堂学习的学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信