Inferred vision: An analysis of the commentators’ descriptions of players’ visual perceptions and intentions during volleyball broadcasts

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Naonori Akiya
{"title":"Inferred vision: An analysis of the commentators’ descriptions of players’ visual perceptions and intentions during volleyball broadcasts","authors":"Naonori Akiya","doi":"10.1177/14614456231219642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how inferential description relates to expert knowledge by analyzing commentators’ inferential descriptions of players’ visual perceptions and intentions during live volleyball match broadcasts. The analysis revealed that even when the commentator could not provide the viewer with detailed visual evidence of what, when, and how the player perceives their surroundings, they could still make inferences about the player’s visual perception based on their own knowledge. The inference is made to show that a particular play was created with some intention. In addition, such inferential descriptions of visual skills, which conceptually link the player’s perceptions and intentions, are often contrasted with descriptions based on ‘popular vision’. These practices clarify the commentators’ expertise. These findings advance the theory of sports expertise in media studies and science and technology studies (STS) from the perspective of expert practices.","PeriodicalId":47598,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Studies","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231219642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores how inferential description relates to expert knowledge by analyzing commentators’ inferential descriptions of players’ visual perceptions and intentions during live volleyball match broadcasts. The analysis revealed that even when the commentator could not provide the viewer with detailed visual evidence of what, when, and how the player perceives their surroundings, they could still make inferences about the player’s visual perception based on their own knowledge. The inference is made to show that a particular play was created with some intention. In addition, such inferential descriptions of visual skills, which conceptually link the player’s perceptions and intentions, are often contrasted with descriptions based on ‘popular vision’. These practices clarify the commentators’ expertise. These findings advance the theory of sports expertise in media studies and science and technology studies (STS) from the perspective of expert practices.
推断视觉:分析排球转播中解说员对球员视觉感知和意图的描述
本研究通过分析排球比赛直播中解说员对球员视觉感知和意图的推理描述,探讨了推理描述与专家知识之间的关系。分析表明,即使解说员无法向观众提供球员感知周围环境的内容、时间和方式的详细视觉证据,他们仍然可以根据自己的知识对球员的视觉感知做出推断。做出推论的目的是为了说明某个特定的剧目是出于某种意图而创作的。此外,这种从概念上将选手的感知和意图联系起来的视觉技能推论性描述,往往与基于 "大众视觉 "的描述形成对比。这些做法澄清了评论员的专业知识。这些发现从专家实践的角度推进了媒体研究和科技研究(STS)中的体育专业知识理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Discourse Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal for the study of text and talk. Publishing outstanding work on the structures and strategies of written and spoken discourse, special attention is given to cross-disciplinary studies of text and talk in linguistics, anthropology, ethnomethodology, cognitive and social psychology, communication studies and law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信