Reconceptualising urban liveability: a quantitative assessment of inhabitant needs in Colombo, Sri Lanka

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Maheshi Tennakoon, Akila Rathnasinghe, Udayangani Kulatunga
{"title":"Reconceptualising urban liveability: a quantitative assessment of inhabitant needs in Colombo, Sri Lanka","authors":"Maheshi Tennakoon, Akila Rathnasinghe, Udayangani Kulatunga","doi":"10.1057/s41289-024-00242-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The proliferation of cities has brought numerous challenges, contributing to a deterioration of its inhabitants’ quality of life and liveability. To address these challenges, this paper advocates for a planning approach that prioritises inhabitants’ concerns. It introduces the concept of liveability as a philosophy to tackle urban challenges and proposes identifying priority factors for urban development and investment. This study is focused on Colombo, Sri Lanka, an economic capital in South Asia, investigating all of its nine local authorities through a questionnaire survey and document reviews. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) facilitated data collection and pairwise comparisons of liveability factors. This study identifies six liveability characteristics, 25 attributes, and 71 indicators for prioritisation. The study finds that a balanced socio-economic environment is the most important characteristic, and safety is the most prioritised attribute. In terms of implications, the participatory approach employed in this study enables government authorities to efficiently formulate policies that enhance urban services and liveability. The study pioneers a context-specific approach to measuring liveability in urban settings, particularly in the South Asian region, offering invaluable guidance to urban planners and decision-makers grappling with the challenges of urbanisation and striving to improve liveability in similar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46557,"journal":{"name":"Urban Design International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Design International","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-024-00242-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proliferation of cities has brought numerous challenges, contributing to a deterioration of its inhabitants’ quality of life and liveability. To address these challenges, this paper advocates for a planning approach that prioritises inhabitants’ concerns. It introduces the concept of liveability as a philosophy to tackle urban challenges and proposes identifying priority factors for urban development and investment. This study is focused on Colombo, Sri Lanka, an economic capital in South Asia, investigating all of its nine local authorities through a questionnaire survey and document reviews. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) facilitated data collection and pairwise comparisons of liveability factors. This study identifies six liveability characteristics, 25 attributes, and 71 indicators for prioritisation. The study finds that a balanced socio-economic environment is the most important characteristic, and safety is the most prioritised attribute. In terms of implications, the participatory approach employed in this study enables government authorities to efficiently formulate policies that enhance urban services and liveability. The study pioneers a context-specific approach to measuring liveability in urban settings, particularly in the South Asian region, offering invaluable guidance to urban planners and decision-makers grappling with the challenges of urbanisation and striving to improve liveability in similar settings.

Abstract Image

重新认识城市宜居性:对斯里兰卡科伦坡居民需求的量化评估
城市的激增带来了众多挑战,导致居民的生活质量和宜居性下降。为了应对这些挑战,本文主张采用一种优先考虑居民关切的规划方法。它引入了宜居性的概念,将其作为应对城市挑战的一种理念,并建议确定城市发展和投资的优先因素。本研究以南亚经济首都斯里兰卡科伦坡为重点,通过问卷调查和文件审查对其九个地方当局进行了调查。层次分析法(AHP)为数据收集和宜居因素的配对比较提供了便利。本研究确定了 6 个宜居特征、25 个属性和 71 个指标,以进行优先排序。研究发现,均衡的社会经济环境是最重要的特征,而安全则是最优先考虑的属性。就其意义而言,本研究采用的参与式方法使政府部门能够有效地制定政策,以提高城市服务和宜居性。这项研究开创了一种针对具体情况的方法来衡量城市环境的宜居性,尤其是在南亚地区,为城市规划者和决策者应对城市化挑战和努力提高类似环境的宜居性提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: URBAN DESIGN International is: an essential forum for the exchange of information and debate concerning issues of urban design and management a vital resource for urban designers, architects, planners, landscape architects and developers an international peer-reviewed publication. URBAN DESIGN International is the first truly international network for all of those involved in the multi-disciplinary tasks of urban design and management. In providing a direct forum for the exchange of information and a vehicle for the debate which constantly redefines the scope of urban design, the journal places a primary emphasis on bringing together practice and research. It addresses current issues and aims to make a range of materials accessible to all: from in-depth papers and reviews of projects, to book reviews, comments on previous contributions and a diary of international events. Some issues are themed by topic or geographic region. The international range of the journal is impressive as witnessed by contributions from all the major continents and an active and extensive editorial structure. Amongst the issues the journal addresses are: urban design theory and practice urban development and management urban ecology heritage and local identity diverse communities of interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信