New Frailty Index Approach Predicts COVID-19 Mortality Risk

IF 0.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alexander Fedintsev, Maria Karnaushkina, Ilia Stambler, Arnold Mitnitski, Alexander Melerzanov, Maria Litvinova, Kirill Balbek, Alexey Moskalev
{"title":"New Frailty Index Approach Predicts COVID-19 Mortality Risk","authors":"Alexander Fedintsev,&nbsp;Maria Karnaushkina,&nbsp;Ilia Stambler,&nbsp;Arnold Mitnitski,&nbsp;Alexander Melerzanov,&nbsp;Maria Litvinova,&nbsp;Kirill Balbek,&nbsp;Alexey Moskalev","doi":"10.1134/S2079057024600046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationships between blood biomarkers, frailty, and the risk of death of people diagnosed with COVID-19 is unclear. In the current investigation we decided to analyze the collective effect of multiple biomarkers (laboratory markers of inflammation, blood biochemistry deviations, comorbidity, demographics) on mortality in people diagnosed with COVID-19. We analyzed baseline data of one hundred fifty-five patients (age range from twenty-six to ninety-four) diagnosed with COVID-19. Thirty-seven parameters (including major morbidities) were used to derive the frailty index (FI) and calculate the risk of death as a function of FI and individual biomarkers. Discriminative ability was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC curves). The mean frailty index was 0.17 (SD = 0.10), FI of those who survived was 0.11 (SD = 0.078) and those who died was 0.22 (SD = 0.093). In a sex-adjusted model, the FI was a more powerful predictor for mortality than age. The ROC analysis showed that models involving FI as a feature have good discriminative ability for predicting COVID-19 mortality: AUC for age was 0.77, for the FI it was 0.82, and for the fully adjusted model (age + FI) it was 0.84. Thus, the systemic effect of multiple biological processes comprising aging are elucidated using the Frailty Index approach. Assessment of the frailty index at the time of admission of a patient with COVID-19 to the clinic can help to predict the high risks of severe disease and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":44756,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S2079057024600046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationships between blood biomarkers, frailty, and the risk of death of people diagnosed with COVID-19 is unclear. In the current investigation we decided to analyze the collective effect of multiple biomarkers (laboratory markers of inflammation, blood biochemistry deviations, comorbidity, demographics) on mortality in people diagnosed with COVID-19. We analyzed baseline data of one hundred fifty-five patients (age range from twenty-six to ninety-four) diagnosed with COVID-19. Thirty-seven parameters (including major morbidities) were used to derive the frailty index (FI) and calculate the risk of death as a function of FI and individual biomarkers. Discriminative ability was assessed by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC curves). The mean frailty index was 0.17 (SD = 0.10), FI of those who survived was 0.11 (SD = 0.078) and those who died was 0.22 (SD = 0.093). In a sex-adjusted model, the FI was a more powerful predictor for mortality than age. The ROC analysis showed that models involving FI as a feature have good discriminative ability for predicting COVID-19 mortality: AUC for age was 0.77, for the FI it was 0.82, and for the fully adjusted model (age + FI) it was 0.84. Thus, the systemic effect of multiple biological processes comprising aging are elucidated using the Frailty Index approach. Assessment of the frailty index at the time of admission of a patient with COVID-19 to the clinic can help to predict the high risks of severe disease and mortality.

Abstract Image

新的虚弱指数方法可预测 COVID-19 的死亡率风险
摘要 血液生物标志物、虚弱程度和 COVID-19 患者死亡风险之间的关系尚不清楚。在本次调查中,我们决定分析多种生物标志物(炎症实验室标志物、血液生化偏差、合并症、人口统计学特征)对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的共同影响。我们分析了 155 名确诊为 COVID-19 的患者(年龄在 26 岁至 94 岁之间)的基线数据。我们利用 37 个参数(包括主要病症)得出了虚弱指数 (FI),并根据 FI 和单个生物标志物的函数计算了死亡风险。判别能力通过接收者工作特征曲线(ROC)下的面积进行评估。平均虚弱指数为 0.17(SD = 0.10),存活者的虚弱指数为 0.11(SD = 0.078),死亡者的虚弱指数为 0.22(SD = 0.093)。在性别调整模型中,FI比年龄更能预测死亡率。ROC 分析表明,以 FI 为特征的模型在预测 COVID-19 死亡率方面具有良好的区分能力:年龄的 AUC 为 0.77,FI 为 0.82,完全调整模型(年龄 + FI)的 AUC 为 0.84。因此,使用虚弱指数方法可以阐明衰老的多种生物过程的系统性影响。在 COVID-19 患者入院时对其进行虚弱指数评估,有助于预测严重疾病和死亡的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Gerontology
Advances in Gerontology GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Advances in Gerontology focuses on biomedical aspects of aging. The journal also publishes original articles and reviews on progress in the following research areas: demography of aging; molecular and physiological mechanisms of aging, clinical gerontology and geriatrics, prevention of premature aging, medicosocial aspects of gerontology, and behavior and psychology of the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信