Courtney M. Leo, Jaehoon Jang, Ethan J. Corey, William J. Neary, Jared I. Bowman and Justin G. Kennemur*,
{"title":"Comparison of Polypentenamer and Polynorbornene Bottlebrushes in Dilute Solution","authors":"Courtney M. Leo, Jaehoon Jang, Ethan J. Corey, William J. Neary, Jared I. Bowman and Justin G. Kennemur*, ","doi":"10.1021/acspolymersau.3c00052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Bottlebrush (BB) polymers were synthesized via grafting-from-atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene on polypentenamer and polynorbornene macroinitiators with matched grafting density (<i>n</i><sub>g</sub> = 4) and backbone degrees of polymerization (122 ≥ <i>N</i><sub>bb</sub> ≥ 61) to produce a comparative study on their respective dilute solution properties as a function of increasing side chain degree of polymerization (116 ≥ <i>N</i><sub>sc</sub> ≥ 5). The grafting-from technique produced near quantitative grafting efficiency and narrow dispersity <i>N</i><sub>sc</sub> as evidenced by spectroscopic analysis and ring closing metathesis depolymerization of the polypentenamer BBs. The versatility of this synthetic approach permitted a comprehensive survey of power law expressions that arise from monitoring intrinsic viscosity, hydrodynamic radius, and radius of gyration as a function of increasing the molar mass of the BBs by increasing <i>N</i><sub>sc</sub>. These values were compared to a series of linear (nongrafted, <i>N</i><sub>sc</sub> = 0) macroinitiators in addition to linear grafts. This unique study allowed elucidation of the onset of bottlebrush behavior for two different types of bottlebrush backbones with identical grafting density but inherently different flexibility. In addition, grafting-from ATRP of methyl acrylate on a polypentenamer macroinitiator allowed the observation of the effects of graft chemistry in comparison to polystyrene. Differences in the observed scaling relationships in dilute solution as a function of each of these synthetic variants are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72049,"journal":{"name":"ACS polymers Au","volume":"4 3","pages":"235–246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acspolymersau.3c00052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS polymers Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acspolymersau.3c00052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bottlebrush (BB) polymers were synthesized via grafting-from-atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene on polypentenamer and polynorbornene macroinitiators with matched grafting density (ng = 4) and backbone degrees of polymerization (122 ≥ Nbb ≥ 61) to produce a comparative study on their respective dilute solution properties as a function of increasing side chain degree of polymerization (116 ≥ Nsc ≥ 5). The grafting-from technique produced near quantitative grafting efficiency and narrow dispersity Nsc as evidenced by spectroscopic analysis and ring closing metathesis depolymerization of the polypentenamer BBs. The versatility of this synthetic approach permitted a comprehensive survey of power law expressions that arise from monitoring intrinsic viscosity, hydrodynamic radius, and radius of gyration as a function of increasing the molar mass of the BBs by increasing Nsc. These values were compared to a series of linear (nongrafted, Nsc = 0) macroinitiators in addition to linear grafts. This unique study allowed elucidation of the onset of bottlebrush behavior for two different types of bottlebrush backbones with identical grafting density but inherently different flexibility. In addition, grafting-from ATRP of methyl acrylate on a polypentenamer macroinitiator allowed the observation of the effects of graft chemistry in comparison to polystyrene. Differences in the observed scaling relationships in dilute solution as a function of each of these synthetic variants are discussed.