Drastic changes in ground-dwelling beetle communities following high-intensity deer culling: insights from an island ecosystem.

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Blake M Dawson, Maldwyn J Evans, Philip S Barton, Masashi Soga, Kahoko Tochigi, Shinsuke Koike
{"title":"Drastic changes in ground-dwelling beetle communities following high-intensity deer culling: insights from an island ecosystem.","authors":"Blake M Dawson, Maldwyn J Evans, Philip S Barton, Masashi Soga, Kahoko Tochigi, Shinsuke Koike","doi":"10.1093/ee/nvae013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overabundance of large herbivores can have detrimental effects on the local environment due to overgrazing. Culling is a common management practice implemented globally that can effectively control herbivore populations and allow vegetation communities to recover. However, the broader indirect effects of culling large herbivores remain relatively unknown, particularly on insect species such as ground-dwelling beetles that perform key ecosystem processes such as decomposition. Here we undertook a preliminary investigation to determine how culling sika deer on an island in North Japan impacted ground-beetle community dynamics. We conducted pitfall trapping in July and September in 2012 (before culling) and again in 2019 (after culling). We compared beetle abundance and community composition within 4 beetle families (Carabidae, Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae, and Silphidae), across seasons and culling treatments. We found each family responded differently to deer culling. Scarabaeidae displayed the greatest decline in abundance after culling. Silphidae also had reduced abundance but to a lesser extent compared to Scarabaeidae. Carabidae had both higher and lower abundance after culling, depending on the season. We found beetle community composition differed between culling and season, but seasonal variability was reduced after culling. Overall, the culling of large herbivores resulted in a reduction of ground-dwelling beetle populations, particularly necrophagous species dependent on dung and carrion for survival. Our preliminary research highlights the need for long-term and large-scale experiments to understand the indirect ecological implications of culling programs on ecosystem processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11751,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Entomology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvae013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overabundance of large herbivores can have detrimental effects on the local environment due to overgrazing. Culling is a common management practice implemented globally that can effectively control herbivore populations and allow vegetation communities to recover. However, the broader indirect effects of culling large herbivores remain relatively unknown, particularly on insect species such as ground-dwelling beetles that perform key ecosystem processes such as decomposition. Here we undertook a preliminary investigation to determine how culling sika deer on an island in North Japan impacted ground-beetle community dynamics. We conducted pitfall trapping in July and September in 2012 (before culling) and again in 2019 (after culling). We compared beetle abundance and community composition within 4 beetle families (Carabidae, Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae, and Silphidae), across seasons and culling treatments. We found each family responded differently to deer culling. Scarabaeidae displayed the greatest decline in abundance after culling. Silphidae also had reduced abundance but to a lesser extent compared to Scarabaeidae. Carabidae had both higher and lower abundance after culling, depending on the season. We found beetle community composition differed between culling and season, but seasonal variability was reduced after culling. Overall, the culling of large herbivores resulted in a reduction of ground-dwelling beetle populations, particularly necrophagous species dependent on dung and carrion for survival. Our preliminary research highlights the need for long-term and large-scale experiments to understand the indirect ecological implications of culling programs on ecosystem processes.

高强度捕杀鹿后地栖甲虫群落的急剧变化:一个岛屿生态系统的启示。
由于过度放牧,大型食草动物数量过多会对当地环境造成不利影响。扑杀是全球普遍采用的一种管理方法,可有效控制食草动物的数量,使植被群落得以恢复。然而,捕杀大型食草动物的广泛间接影响仍相对未知,特别是对昆虫物种的影响,如地栖甲虫,它们执行着生态系统的关键过程,如分解。在此,我们进行了一项初步调查,以确定在日本北部的一个岛屿上捕杀梅花鹿如何影响地栖甲虫群落动态。我们在 2012 年(扑杀前)和 2019 年(扑杀后)的 7 月和 9 月进行了坑式诱捕。我们比较了 4 个甲虫科(Carabidae、Scarabaeidae、Geotrupidae 和 Silphidae)在不同季节和扑杀处理中的甲虫丰度和群落组成。我们发现每个科对扑杀鹿的反应都不同。捕杀后,猩鲵科的丰度下降幅度最大。鞘氨蝶科的数量也有所减少,但与猩红蝶科相比程度较轻。甲虫科在扑杀后的丰度有高有低,这取决于季节。我们发现甲虫群落组成在扑杀和季节之间存在差异,但扑杀后季节变异性降低。总体而言,扑杀大型食草动物导致地栖甲虫数量减少,尤其是依赖粪便和腐肉生存的食尸物种。我们的初步研究强调,需要进行长期和大规模的实验,以了解扑杀计划对生态系统过程的间接生态影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Entomology
Environmental Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes reports on the interaction of insects with the biological, chemical, and physical aspects of their environment. In addition to research papers, Environmental Entomology publishes Reviews, interpretive articles in a Forum section, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信