Executive Function as a Predictor of Pain Perception in Healthy Young Adults.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Sarah Garcia, Elodie Foster, Peter J Johnson, Brittany Thomas, Robert L Askew
{"title":"Executive Function as a Predictor of Pain Perception in Healthy Young Adults.","authors":"Sarah Garcia, Elodie Foster, Peter J Johnson, Brittany Thomas, Robert L Askew","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pain's impact on executive function is understood and specific cognitive abilities may contribute to coping with pain, though past work is confounded by chronic pain populations. This study aims to understand how executive functioning may predict the experience of pain among healthy adults. It was hypothesized that poorer executive functioning would predict more intense pain perception.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 172 young adults were recruited for participation. Three aspects of executive functioning (i.e., impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, working memory) were assessed before randomizing participants to varying types and levels of stimulated pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results supported the hypothesis that poorer performance on tasks of working memory predicts more intense pain perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings are counter to past work that has found inhibition may be important for coping, and future research is needed to understand the impact of specific cognitive abilities as well as how this may differ for chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pain's impact on executive function is understood and specific cognitive abilities may contribute to coping with pain, though past work is confounded by chronic pain populations. This study aims to understand how executive functioning may predict the experience of pain among healthy adults. It was hypothesized that poorer executive functioning would predict more intense pain perception.

Method: A total of 172 young adults were recruited for participation. Three aspects of executive functioning (i.e., impulsivity, cognitive flexibility, working memory) were assessed before randomizing participants to varying types and levels of stimulated pain.

Results: Results supported the hypothesis that poorer performance on tasks of working memory predicts more intense pain perception.

Conclusions: Findings are counter to past work that has found inhibition may be important for coping, and future research is needed to understand the impact of specific cognitive abilities as well as how this may differ for chronic pain.

预测健康年轻人疼痛感的执行功能
目的:人们了解疼痛对执行功能的影响,特定的认知能力可能有助于应对疼痛,但过去的研究受到慢性疼痛人群的影响。本研究旨在了解执行功能如何预测健康成年人的疼痛体验。研究假设,较差的执行功能将预测更强烈的疼痛感:方法:共招募了 172 名年轻成年人参与研究。在将参与者随机分配到不同类型和程度的疼痛刺激中之前,先对执行功能的三个方面(即冲动性、认知灵活性和工作记忆)进行了评估:结果:结果支持这样的假设,即在工作记忆任务中表现较差会预示更强烈的疼痛感知:研究结果与过去的研究结果相反,过去的研究发现抑制可能对应对疼痛很重要,未来的研究需要了解特定认知能力的影响,以及这种能力对慢性疼痛的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信