Lysimeter-based full fertilizer 15N balances corroborate direct dinitrogen emission measurements using the 15N gas flow method

IF 5.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Irina Yankelzon, Lexie Schilling, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Rainer Gasche, Jincheng Han, Lorenz Hartl, Julia Kepp, Amanda Matson, Ulrike Ostler, Clemens Scheer, Katrin Schneider, Arne Tenspolde, Reinhard Well, Benjamin Wolf, Nicole Wrage-Moennig, Michael Dannenmann
{"title":"Lysimeter-based full fertilizer 15N balances corroborate direct dinitrogen emission measurements using the 15N gas flow method","authors":"Irina Yankelzon, Lexie Schilling, Klaus Butterbach-Bahl, Rainer Gasche, Jincheng Han, Lorenz Hartl, Julia Kepp, Amanda Matson, Ulrike Ostler, Clemens Scheer, Katrin Schneider, Arne Tenspolde, Reinhard Well, Benjamin Wolf, Nicole Wrage-Moennig, Michael Dannenmann","doi":"10.1007/s00374-024-01801-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <sup>15</sup>N gas flux (<sup>15</sup>NGF) method allows for direct in situ quantification of dinitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>) emissions from soils, but a successful cross-comparison with another method is missing. The objectives of this study were to quantify N<sub>2</sub> emissions of a wheat rotation using the <sup>15</sup>NGF method, to compare these N<sub>2</sub> emissions with those obtained from a lysimeter-based <sup>15</sup>N fertilizer mass balance approach, and to contextualize N<sub>2</sub> emissions with <sup>15</sup>N enrichment of N<sub>2</sub> in soil air. For four sampling periods, fertilizer-derived N<sub>2</sub> losses (<sup>15</sup>NGF method) were similar to unaccounted fertilizer N fates as obtained from the <sup>15</sup>N mass balance approach. Total N<sub>2</sub> emissions (<sup>15</sup>NGF method) amounted to 21 ± 3 kg N ha<sup>− 1</sup>, with 13 ± 2 kg N ha<sup>− 1</sup> (7.5% of applied fertilizer N) originating from fertilizer. In comparison, the <sup>15</sup>N mass balance approach overall indicated fertilizer-derived N<sub>2</sub> emissions of 11%, equivalent to 18 ± 13 kg N ha<sup>− 1</sup>. Nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions were small (0.15 ± 0.01 kg N ha<sup>− 1</sup> or 0.1% of fertilizer N), resulting in a large mean N<sub>2</sub>:(N<sub>2</sub>O + N<sub>2</sub>) ratio of 0.94 ± 0.06. Due to the applied drip fertigation, ammonia emissions accounted for &lt; 1% of fertilizer-N, while N leaching was negligible. The temporal variability of N<sub>2</sub> emissions was well explained by the δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>2</sub> in soil air down to 50 cm depth. We conclude the <sup>15</sup>NGF method provides realistic estimates of field N<sub>2</sub> emissions and should be more widely used to better understand soil N<sub>2</sub> losses. Moreover, combining soil air δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>2</sub> measurements with diffusion modeling might be an alternative approach for constraining soil N<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9210,"journal":{"name":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology and Fertility of Soils","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-024-01801-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 15N gas flux (15NGF) method allows for direct in situ quantification of dinitrogen (N2) emissions from soils, but a successful cross-comparison with another method is missing. The objectives of this study were to quantify N2 emissions of a wheat rotation using the 15NGF method, to compare these N2 emissions with those obtained from a lysimeter-based 15N fertilizer mass balance approach, and to contextualize N2 emissions with 15N enrichment of N2 in soil air. For four sampling periods, fertilizer-derived N2 losses (15NGF method) were similar to unaccounted fertilizer N fates as obtained from the 15N mass balance approach. Total N2 emissions (15NGF method) amounted to 21 ± 3 kg N ha− 1, with 13 ± 2 kg N ha− 1 (7.5% of applied fertilizer N) originating from fertilizer. In comparison, the 15N mass balance approach overall indicated fertilizer-derived N2 emissions of 11%, equivalent to 18 ± 13 kg N ha− 1. Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions were small (0.15 ± 0.01 kg N ha− 1 or 0.1% of fertilizer N), resulting in a large mean N2:(N2O + N2) ratio of 0.94 ± 0.06. Due to the applied drip fertigation, ammonia emissions accounted for < 1% of fertilizer-N, while N leaching was negligible. The temporal variability of N2 emissions was well explained by the δ15N2 in soil air down to 50 cm depth. We conclude the 15NGF method provides realistic estimates of field N2 emissions and should be more widely used to better understand soil N2 losses. Moreover, combining soil air δ15N2 measurements with diffusion modeling might be an alternative approach for constraining soil N2 emissions.

Abstract Image

基于溶度计的全肥料 15N 平衡证实了使用 15N 气体流量法进行的直接二氮排放测量结果
15N 气体通量(15NGF)方法可直接就地量化土壤中的二氮(N2)排放量,但目前还没有与其他方法进行成功的交叉比较。本研究的目的是利用 15NGF 方法量化小麦轮作的 N2 排放量,将这些 N2 排放量与基于溶样计的 15N 化肥质量平衡方法获得的排放量进行比较,并将土壤空气中的 N2 排放量与 15N 富集情况联系起来。在四个采样期中,化肥产生的 N2 损失(15NGF 法)与 15N 质量平衡法得出的未计化肥 N 分布情况相似。N2 排放总量(15NGF 法)为 21 ± 3 kg N ha-1,其中 13 ± 2 kg N ha-1(占施肥 N 的 7.5%)来自肥料。相比之下,15N 质量平衡法总体显示肥料产生的 N2 排放量为 11%,相当于 18 ± 13 千克 N ha-1。氧化亚氮(N2O)排放量较小(0.15 ± 0.01 kg N ha- 1 或肥料 N 的 0.1%),导致平均 N2:(N2O + N2)比值较大,为 0.94 ± 0.06。由于采用滴灌施肥,氨的排放量占肥料氮的 1%,而氮的沥滤可以忽略不计。土壤空气中的 δ15N2 可以很好地解释 50 厘米深的 N2 排放的时间变化。我们的结论是,15NGF 方法提供了对田间 N2 排放量的真实估计,应更广泛地用于更好地了解土壤 N2 损失。此外,将土壤空气δ15N2 测量与扩散建模相结合可能是限制土壤 N2 排放的另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Biology and Fertility of Soils 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
10.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Biology and Fertility of Soils publishes in English original papers, reviews and short communications on all fundamental and applied aspects of biology – microflora and microfauna - and fertility of soils. It offers a forum for research aimed at broadening the understanding of biological functions, processes and interactions in soils, particularly concerning the increasing demands of agriculture, deforestation and industrialization. The journal includes articles on techniques and methods that evaluate processes, biogeochemical interactions and ecological stresses, and sometimes presents special issues on relevant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信